2016 NFL Power Rankings Consensus: Week 4

Before the season even started, many were laughing at the prospects of Carson Wentz leading the Eagles to any sort of success. When Teddy Bridgewater's knee exploded, many were writing eulogies about the 2016 Vikings season. Who's laughing now? Where are those obituaries?

There's a narrative emerging in the national media: are the Eagles for real? The very question introduces some doubt in their 3-0 start. The conventional wisdom being, "there's no way they can be this good. Carson Wentz? Really?"

Conversely, heading into the season, people were very high on the Vikings this year; and then Teddy Bridgewater went down. Eulogies were written. Thinkpieces pondering how the Vikings could possibly turn the season around (when it hadn't even started yet). Then the season started, and the Vikings showed they weren't dead. Their defense is rivaling the vaunted Denver Broncos'. And now without their two key offensive players in Teddy Bridgewater and Adrian Peterson, nobody is sweating.

Author's Note: I missed getting this done last week because it was crunch time at work. So all the comparisons and "differences" columns will be referencing the Week 2 rankings.

Notable Quotes

The Chargers are well on their way to being the league’s best 5–11 team, which comes with the likely prize package of a top-10 pick and a new coach. And if the Chargers’ bid on their own showcase comes within $100 of being correct, they also win the other showcase: a new stadium, a jet ski and a DVD collection of Alec Baldwin movies.

The Chargers front office announced today that they will be preemptively injuring their star players. Sources close to the team speculate that a shipment of baseball bats and ski masks might have something to do with their plan. Meanwhile, the players union has sent bubble wrap and duct tape to cushion the legs, feet, and ankles of every Chargers player on the roster. When asked if something in the San Diego water supply was causing these injuries, government officials were quoted as saying, "no Charge no".

Evaluating this Chargers' defense is beyond difficult. Both of San Diego's losses felt like that girl who matches you on Bumble but never sends you a follow-up message. Then there was the blowout win against the Jags, which seemed like an easy stroll by a dominant D -- but we know that's not the case. The unit was viable on Sunday. Unfortunately, the absence of Keenan Allen and Danny Woodhead made it harder to pull off the road win.

Division Averages

Before we get to looking at where all the teams rank, let's take look at the bigger picture in the NFL. This table takes the average rankings for each team, then averages the rankings of each team in the division. It's used as a way of showing where the tougher and weaker divisions lie each week.

Stock Rising

Atlanta's nearly-9-point rise would certainly be noteworthy on its own, if it wasn't for Philadelphia's 13 point rise.

Stock Falling

Subjective Average

We'll start off with the Subjective Average. These rankings are the ones that has actual people ranking the teams based on their gut feelings. You'll see in a moment that some of these sites may even just throw darts at a board, or have a chicken pecking at numbers.

I then take all those rankings and average them together, then sort the table based on the average ranking. This method evens out the peaks and valleys and allows us to get a more reliable "big picture" view of the perception of where teams rank in the league.

		Subjective
		ESPN	Fox	CBS	USA	SI	PFT	NFL	SN	SBN	Reddit	AP		Average		Change in Value
1	Patriots	2	1	1	1	1	2	1	1	2	1	1		1.273		-0.091
2	Broncos	1	2	2	2	2	1	2	2	1	2	2		1.727		1.637
3	Vikings	4	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3		3.091		7.818
4	Eagles	7	5	5	4	4	6	6	4	5	8	4		5.273		15.909
5	Packers	6	4	4	5	7	5	4	5	9	5	5		5.364		-1.455
6	Seahawks	3	6	7	7	9	8	5	7	4	6	6		6.182		-1.546
7	Steelers	9	7	6	6	6	9	7	6	12	4	7		7.182		-3.000
8	Ravens	10	8	8	9	8	7	10	8	6	12	8		8.546		5.545
9	Panthers	8	13	10	8	10	4	11	12	10	7	10		9.364		-3.909
10	Chiefs	12	11	12	13	5	11	8	9	7	9	9		9.636		0.364
11	Cardinals	5	9	14	12	15	16	12	13	14	10	13		12.091		-4.455
12	Cowboys	11	10	9	19	12	12	9	14	16	16	14		12.909		6.273
13	Texans	16	17	11	10	14	10	13	11	18	13	12		13.182		-2.182
14	Bengals	13	15	15	14	11	17	14	15	8	11	15		13.455		-7.091
15	Raiders	14	14	13	15	13	15	15	17	11	14	16		14.273		-3.364
16	Giants	15	16	16	16	16	14	16	10	13	15	11		14.364		-0.546
17	Falcons	18	12	17	11	17	13	17	16	15	17	17		15.455		10.545
18	Jets	19	26	19	17	18	18	18	19	19	18	18		19.000		-2.273
19	Rams	24	18	18	18	19	19	21	18	22	23	19		19.909		11.273
20	Redskins	20	22	22	23	21	24	22	22	17	22	20		21.364		-2.455
21	Colts	23	19	20	21	22	23	24	23	24	19	22		21.818		-0.182
22	Bills	22	23	24	25	20	25	19	27	20	20	21		22.364		1.818
23	Lions	17	27	27	20	27	27	20	21	27	21	24		23.455		-5.182
24	Chargers	21	20	21	26	23	28	25	24	23	25	23		23.546		3.909
25	Buccaneers	28	25	25	22	24	21	23	20	26	24	25		23.909		-7.818
26	Dolphins	25	24	23	27	25	20	27	28	21	26	26		24.727		-2.636
27	Titans	26	21	28	24	26	22	26	25	25	29	27		25.364		3.000
28	49ers	30	28	26	28	30	26	28	26	30	27	28		27.909		-1.909
29	Saints	27	30	29	29	28	29	29	29	29	28	29		28.727		-4.454
30	Jaguars	29	29	31	30	31	30	30	30	28	30	30		29.818		-11.091
31	Browns	32	31	32	32	29	31	31	32	31	32	31		31.273		0.454
32	Bears	31	32	30	31	32	32	32	31	32	31	32		31.455		-2.909

Observations:

• I can't believe this: it's Week 3 and the Browns aren't the unanimous pick for worst team in the league. Though Chicago has looked pretty bad.
• Unfortunate that the Jaguars have nothing to show for all the preseason hype around them, which has led to their 11-spot drop.
• Conversely, two weeks ago the Rams were almost a lock for the worst team in the league; not so much anymore.
• Patriots and Broncos duking it out for first, with the Patriots getting the edge. I mean, it's hard to argue with that given how dominant they've been without Brady. But I wonder how much has been courtesy of their competition not being as strong as once thought heading into the season.
• Sharp divide between the Falcons and the Jets.

Subjective Standard Deviation

Put simply, Standard Deviation is a tool in statistics to measure how much variance there is in a set of numbers. To put more simply: I use it to look at who's ranked the most- and least-consistently. In Standard Deviation, the lower the number, the more consistent the values in the set.

For our purposes, this means the lower the Standard Deviation, the more consistent the rankings. The opposite is true too: the higher the number, the less consistent the rankings.

This table is sorted by most-consistently ranked to least-consistently ranked.

		Subjective
		ESPN	Fox	CBS	USA	SI	PFT	NFL	SN	SBN	Reddit	AP		STD DEV		Change in Value
1	Vikings	4	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3		0.288		-2.141
2	Broncos	1	2	2	2	2	1	2	2	1	2	2		0.445		-1.612
3	Patriots	2	1	1	1	1	2	1	1	2	1	1		0.445		0.059
4	Bears	31	32	30	31	32	32	32	31	32	31	32		0.656		-0.960
5	Saints	27	30	29	29	28	29	29	29	29	28	29		0.750		-0.670
6	Jaguars	29	29	31	30	31	30	30	30	28	30	30		0.833		-1.729
7	Browns	32	31	32	32	29	31	31	32	31	32	31		0.862		0.417
8	Eagles	7	5	5	4	4	6	6	4	5	8	4		1.286		-1.157
9	Packers	6	4	4	5	7	5	4	5	9	5	5		1.432		-0.543
10	49ers	30	28	26	28	30	26	28	26	30	27	28		1.505		-1.192
11	Raiders	14	14	13	15	13	15	15	17	11	14	16		1.543		0.303
12	Ravens	10	8	8	9	8	7	10	8	6	12	8		1.559		-0.005
13	Seahawks	3	6	7	7	9	8	5	7	4	6	6		1.641		-0.182
14	Colts	23	19	20	21	22	23	24	23	24	19	22		1.749		-1.851
15	Redskins	20	22	22	23	21	24	22	22	17	22	20		1.772		-1.375
16	Steelers	9	7	6	6	6	9	7	6	12	4	7		2.037		0.845
17	Giants	15	16	16	16	16	14	16	10	13	15	11		2.057		-0.733
18	Rams	24	18	18	18	19	19	21	18	22	23	19		2.109		1.534
19	Buccaneers	28	25	25	22	24	21	23	20	26	24	25		2.193		-1.257
20	Titans	26	21	28	24	26	22	26	25	25	29	27		2.267		0.547
21	Falcons	18	12	17	11	17	13	17	16	15	17	17		2.271		-0.141
22	Chargers	21	20	21	26	23	28	25	24	23	25	23		2.271		0.494
23	Jets	19	26	19	17	18	18	18	19	19	18	18		2.296		-0.599
24	Chiefs	12	11	12	13	5	11	8	9	7	9	9		2.307		1.262
25	Panthers	8	13	10	8	10	4	11	12	10	7	10		2.385		1.012
26	Dolphins	25	24	23	27	25	20	27	28	21	26	26		2.416		-0.981
27	Bengals	13	15	15	14	11	17	14	15	8	11	15		2.426		0.506
28	Bills	22	23	24	25	20	25	19	27	20	20	21		2.496		-0.884
29	Texans	16	17	11	10	14	10	13	11	18	13	12		2.657		0.568
30	Cardinals	5	9	14	12	15	16	12	13	14	10	13		2.968		1.536
31	Cowboys	11	10	9	19	12	12	9	14	16	16	14		3.059		-0.294
32	Lions	17	27	27	20	27	27	20	21	27	21	24		3.577		1.051

Observations:

• Patriots, Broncos, and Vikings pretty much the consensus 1-2-3 right now.
• The bottom-4 is also pretty much figured out.
• SB Nation looks to be the most off "the norm."

Objective Average

I call these rankings the "Objective" rankings because unlike the rankings above, these are rankings based on statistical models of some sort. I use the term "Objective" loosely here because there is still some inherent bias in how the various models are constructed. Each ranking site has their own criteria in what they feel is success in the NFL.

All that said, these rankings are more objective as they remove perception and bias and produce rankings based on how well teams actually play, not how they're perceived to play.

		Objective
		FO	TR	SAG	BG	Aikman	PFR	CHFF	Massey	ARGH	538	FPI		Average		Change in Value
1	Patriots	3	1	1	1	8	2	2	2	1	2	1		2.182		6.040
2	Broncos	10	5	3	2	16	4	4	1	2	1	2		4.546		5.676
3	Chiefs	2	4	9	7	2	8	5	4	6	4	8		5.364		2.525
4	Eagles	6	11	10	3	1	1	1	5	4	10	7		5.364		10.414
5	Vikings	9	9	2	8	21	3	3	3	3	3	5		6.273		4.727
6	Packers	5	6	4	12	6	7	15	7	7	8	3		7.273		-1.606
7	Seahawks	1	3	5	14	7	12	11	8	5	5	9		7.273		-0.940
8	Cardinals	4	2	7	17	11	10	7	12	11	9	4		8.546		-2.213
9	Panthers	11	7	8	18	3	5	14	9	8	6	6		8.636		-1.525
10	Steelers	8	8	6	6	12	16	24	6	10	7	10		10.273		-6.606
11	Ravens	7	14	11	5	13	11	18	13	9	14	21		12.364		1.747
12	Bills	18	12	14	13	10	13	12	15	14	15	13		13.546		2.010
13	Bengals	12	10	12	9	28	21	21	10	13	11	11		14.364		-5.031
14	Cowboys	13	21	13	15	5	28	6	20	18	19	19		16.091		7.576
15	Texans	28	15	16	4	25	19	22	11	12	12	17		16.455		-3.233
16	Chargers	14	13	18	30	15	9	8	21	20	26	12		16.909		2.980
17	Raiders	15	16	15	26	4	25	13	18	21	23	14		17.273		-2.495
18	Falcons	17	19	17	25	20	24	10	16	15	16	15		17.636		7.253
19	Jets	26	18	19	11	22	20	29	14	19	13	18		19.000		-1.889
20	Dolphins	27	17	21	19	23	6	17	22	22	25	23		20.182		2.374
21	Giants	19	24	23	16	18	30	9	19	25	20	20		20.273		-3.940
22	Lions	16	22	25	28	24	15	16	23	17	17	24		20.636		-6.636
23	Colts	22	20	20	29	9	17	27	24	23	21	16		20.727		-2.060
24	Rams	20	23	22	10	27	26	28	17	16	18	31		21.636		2.475
25	49ers	30	25	24	21	14	18	20	26	24	24	29		23.182		-6.626
26	Saints	21	26	30	32	19	31	19	30	30	27	22		26.091		-1.647
27	Titans	24	31	31	27	17	22	23	28	28	32	26		26.273		1.838
28	Redskins	25	29	28	20	31	32	25	25	26	22	27		26.364		-2.031
29	Buccaneers	23	28	26	23	26	29	32	27	27	28	25		26.727		-7.060
30	Browns	32	32	32	24	29	14	26	32	31	30	32		28.546		2.676
31	Bears	31	30	29	22	32	27	31	29	29	29	30		29.000		-3.111
32	Jaguars	29	27	27	31	30	23	30	31	32	31	28		29.000		-1.667

Observations:

• We pretty much have the full slate of "objective" rankings now.
• Wow, Chiefs quietly climbing the board. I say quietly because even though they were a popular pick to win the AFC West this year, the nation as a whole has stopped giving them much attention.
• Interesting cluster of NFC teams from 4-9.
• Kind of surprised to see the Chargers so high in a few of these rankings.
• Wow, is Aikman high on the Raiders Cowboys, but way down on the Vikings and Bengals.

Objective Standard Deviation

		Objective
		FO	TR	SAG	BG	Aikman	PFR	CHFF	Massey	ARGH	538	FPI		STD DEV		Change in Value
1	Patriots	3	1	1	1	8	2	2	2	1	2	1		1.946		-7.701
2	Bills	18	12	14	13	10	13	12	15	14	15	13		1.971		-1.088
3	Chiefs	2	4	9	7	2	8	5	4	6	4	8		2.307		-2.823
4	Jaguars	29	27	27	31	30	23	30	31	32	31	28		2.486		-0.303
5	Buccaneers	23	28	26	23	26	29	32	27	27	28	25		2.490		-2.652
6	Bears	31	30	29	22	32	27	31	29	29	29	30		2.558		-1.226
7	Packers	5	6	4	12	6	7	15	7	7	8	3		3.305		0.948
8	Redskins	25	29	28	20	31	32	25	25	26	22	27		3.419		-5.092
9	Eagles	6	11	10	3	1	1	1	5	4	10	7		3.600		-3.654
10	Seahawks	1	3	5	14	7	12	11	8	5	5	9		3.792		-2.654
11	Falcons	17	19	17	25	20	24	10	16	15	16	15		4.051		1.166
12	Panthers	11	7	8	18	3	5	14	9	8	6	6		4.096		-0.158
13	Cardinals	4	2	7	17	11	10	7	12	11	9	4		4.120		0.958
14	Titans	24	31	31	27	17	22	23	28	28	32	26		4.308		-3.017
15	Lions	16	22	25	28	24	15	16	23	17	17	24		4.312		-0.980
16	Broncos	10	5	3	2	16	4	4	1	2	1	2		4.356		-5.198
17	Ravens	7	14	11	5	13	11	18	13	9	14	21		4.375		0.561
18	49ers	30	25	24	21	14	18	20	26	24	24	29		4.468		-3.780
19	Saints	21	26	30	32	19	31	19	30	30	27	22		4.757		1.453
20	Jets	26	18	19	11	22	20	29	14	19	13	18		5.099		0.518
21	Giants	19	24	23	16	18	30	9	19	25	20	20		5.154		0.210
22	Steelers	8	8	6	6	12	16	24	6	10	7	10		5.224		2.435
23	Colts	22	20	20	29	9	17	27	24	23	21	16		5.224		0.955
24	Browns	32	32	32	24	29	14	26	32	31	30	32		5.281		4.054
25	Vikings	9	9	2	8	21	3	3	3	3	3	5		5.293		-0.020
26	Dolphins	27	17	21	19	23	6	17	22	22	25	23		5.357		0.256
27	Bengals	12	10	12	9	28	21	21	10	13	11	11		5.851		1.935
28	Rams	20	23	22	10	27	26	28	17	16	18	31		5.897		-1.827
29	Raiders	15	16	15	26	4	25	13	18	21	23	14		6.032		2.511
30	Cowboys	13	21	13	15	5	28	6	20	18	19	19		6.374		0.958
31	Texans	28	15	16	4	25	19	22	11	12	12	17		6.542		2.719
32	Chargers	14	13	18	30	15	9	8	21	20	26	12		6.571		1.572

Observations:

• Huh, so the Chargers are the least consistently-ranked team; just barely edging out the Texans.
• Take the Vikings having a high deviation with a grain of salt, since they're very consistently-ranked other than Aikman.

Overall Average

Now let's compare the two sets of data. We'll start with the "Overall Average" chart. This takes the Subjective Average and the Objective Average, and then averages those two numbers. This way it gives equal weight to both averages so that even though Subjective Average has a larger sample size, it doesn't drown out the Objective Average.

		Subj vs Obj
		Subj Avg	Obj Avg		Average		Change in Value
1	Patriots	1.273	2.182		1.727		2.975
2	Broncos	1.727	4.546		3.136		3.657
3	Vikings	3.091	6.273		4.682		6.273
4	Eagles	5.273	5.364		5.318		13.162
5	Packers	5.364	7.273		6.318		-1.530
6	Seahawks	6.182	7.273		6.727		-1.242
7	Chiefs	9.636	5.364		7.500		1.444
8	Steelers	7.182	10.273		8.727		-4.803
9	Panthers	9.364	8.636		9.000		-2.717
10	Cardinals	12.091	8.546		10.318		-3.333
11	Ravens	8.546	12.364		10.455		3.646
12	Bengals	13.455	14.364		13.909		-6.061
13	Cowboys	12.909	16.091		14.500		6.924
14	Texans	13.182	16.455		14.818		-2.707
15	Raiders	14.273	17.273		15.773		-2.930
16	Falcons	15.455	17.636		16.545		8.899
17	Giants	14.364	20.273		17.318		-2.242
18	Bills	22.364	13.546		17.955		1.914
19	Jets	19.000	19.000		19.000		-2.081
20	Chargers	23.546	16.909		20.227		3.445
21	Rams	19.909	21.636		20.773		6.873
22	Colts	21.818	20.727		21.273		-1.121
23	Lions	23.455	20.636		22.045		-5.909
24	Dolphins	24.727	20.182		22.455		-0.132
25	Redskins	21.364	26.364		23.864		-2.243
26	Buccaneers	23.909	26.727		25.318		-7.439
27	49ers	27.909	23.182		25.545		-4.267
28	Titans	25.364	26.273		25.818		2.419
29	Saints	28.727	26.091		27.409		-3.050
30	Jaguars	29.818	29.000		29.409		-6.379
31	Browns	31.273	28.546		29.909		1.566
32	Bears	31.455	29.000		30.227		-3.010

Observations:

• Patriots, Broncos, and Vikings all fairly evenly-spaced apart.
• Eagles a consensus top-5 team in the league right now. Are they for real? It sure seems that way.
• Seems to be a nice cluster of the top 11 teams, with a slight drop-off when going to the Bengals.
• With a few exceptions near the top, NFC and AFC teams seem pretty evenly distributed.

Overall Standard Deviation

The Overall Standard Deviation does not average anything out, it just takes the Standard Deviation across all the rankings. Yes this will even things out slightly, but it goes to show which teams have consensus across the board.

		Subj vs Obj
		Subj Avg	Obj Avg		STD DEV		Change in Value
1	Patriots	1.273	2.182		1.483		-5.881
2	Jaguars	29.818	29.000		1.899		-3.145
3	Bears	31.455	29.000		2.235		-0.868
4	Eagles	5.273	5.364		2.703		-3.144
5	Packers	5.364	7.273		2.720		0.394
6	Buccaneers	23.909	26.727		2.737		-1.912
7	Seahawks	6.182	7.273		2.972		-1.637
8	Chiefs	9.636	5.364		3.144		-0.537
9	Panthers	9.364	8.636		3.371		0.231
10	Broncos	1.727	4.546		3.402		-4.017
11	Falcons	15.455	17.636		3.461		0.768
12	Titans	25.364	26.273		3.472		-1.606
13	Saints	28.727	26.091		3.651		1.196
14	Redskins	21.364	26.364		3.696		-3.037
15	Ravens	8.546	12.364		3.799		0.990
16	Colts	21.818	20.727		3.933		-0.252
17	Jets	19.000	19.000		3.954		0.200
18	Cardinals	12.091	8.546		4.004		1.545
19	Browns	31.273	28.546		4.022		3.100
20	Vikings	3.091	6.273		4.072		0.079
21	49ers	27.909	23.182		4.087		-3.442
22	Lions	23.455	20.636		4.205		-0.337
23	Steelers	7.182	10.273		4.255		2.170
24	Bengals	13.455	14.364		4.502		1.169
25	Rams	19.909	21.636		4.512		-1.765
26	Raiders	14.273	17.273		4.651		1.469
27	Dolphins	24.727	20.182		4.736		0.480
28	Giants	14.364	20.273		4.912		0.807
29	Bills	22.364	13.546		4.950		-0.427
30	Cowboys	12.909	16.091		5.246		0.310
31	Texans	13.182	16.455		5.254		2.060
32	Chargers	23.546	16.909		5.931		0.721

Observations:

• Chargers remain at the bottom of this list.
• It's no surprise that the more consistently-ranked teams are also at the top and bottom of the rankings.

Difference in Averages

This compares the Subjective average ranking with the Objective average ranking. This tells us just how far off people are from the formulas. A positive number means people think they will be or are better than the stats indicate, a negative number means the math thinks they're better than what people think. The closer to 0 this number is, the more in agreement the Subjective and Objective rankings are.

Generally speaking, the Subjective Rankings tend to be more reactionary to a team's performance than the mathematical models are. You'll often end up with major peaks and valleys for a team in the Subjective rankings, where the Objective rankings are more steady.

		Subj vs Obj
		Subj Avg	Obj Avg		Diff. in Avg		Change in Value
1	Giants	14.364	20.273		5.909		3.394
2	Redskins	21.364	26.364		5.000		-0.424
3	Ravens	8.546	12.364		3.818		3.798
4	Texans	13.182	16.455		3.273		1.051
5	Vikings	3.091	6.273		3.182		3.091
6	Cowboys	12.909	16.091		3.182		-1.303
7	Steelers	7.182	10.273		3.091		3.606
8	Raiders	14.273	17.273		3.000		-0.869
9	Broncos	1.727	4.546		2.818		-4.041
10	Buccaneers	23.909	26.727		2.818		-0.758
11	Falcons	15.455	17.636		2.182		3.293
12	Packers	5.364	7.273		1.909		0.151
13	Rams	19.909	21.636		1.727		8.798
14	Seahawks	6.182	7.273		1.091		-0.606
15	Bengals	13.455	14.364		0.909		-2.061
16	Patriots	1.273	2.182		0.909		-6.131
17	Titans	25.364	26.273		0.909		1.162
18	Eagles	5.273	5.364		0.091		5.495
19	Jets	19.000	19.000		0.000		-0.384
20	Panthers	9.364	8.636		-0.727		-2.384
21	Jaguars	29.818	29.000		-0.818		-9.424
22	Colts	21.818	20.727		-1.091		1.879
23	Bears	31.455	29.000		-2.455		0.202
24	Saints	28.727	26.091		-2.636		-2.808
25	Browns	31.273	28.546		-2.727		-2.222
26	Lions	23.455	20.636		-2.818		1.455
27	Cardinals	12.091	8.546		-3.545		-2.242
28	Chiefs	9.636	5.364		-4.273		-2.162
29	Dolphins	24.727	20.182		-4.546		-5.011
30	49ers	27.909	23.182		-4.727		4.717
31	Chargers	23.546	16.909		-6.636		0.930
32	Bills	22.364	13.546		-8.818		-0.192

Observations:

• So not only are the Chargers one of the more inconsistently-ranked teams, but they're also significantly under-ranked when it comes to pundit rankings. Still though, their stats indicate they're an "average" team.
• Wow the Bills are way under-ranked. I wonder how much that loss to the Jets sill lives in peoples minds.
• Neat, the Jets are exactly where they should be.
• Giants and Redskins, being given too much credit?

Sources

About the Author

Follow @creanium