6 things the San Diego Chargers have to overcome to get to a Super Bowl
The San Diego Chargers are pretty much the 2011's underdogs -- or "under-dawgs" depending on where you live. They aren't the most popular Super Bowl pick and NFL analysts and the talking heads you see on ESPN are kind of sick of making predictions that the Chargers are going all the way.
Of course, here at Bolts From The Blue and every other legitimate Chargers-centric website, readers and writers alike think our little blue Bolts have as good a chance as any other team has at getting to the dance.
And why shouldn't they? They're talented, in their prime, and (hopefully) very hungry.
Of course, there are things standing in their way. Here are your ten things that are doing just that, ala Bleacher Report (vomit!), but not really.
6. Their schedule. Last year, the San Diego Chargers' schedule sucked pretty bad. The team wound up playing against the two worst divisions in football in the AFC West and NFC West. That's ten times that the team had to play mediocrity and, holy hell, that's a lot.
This year, the team doesn't have the luxury of wanking around and winding up with a winning record -- they play the NFC North and the AFC East, two of the most competitive divisions in football. While the NFC North has nothing but dangerous teams, the AFC East is more top-heavy, with the New England Patriots and New York Jets leading the way as Super Bowl contenders, while the Miami Dolphins are probably a lot better. (Sorry, Buffalo Bills' fans -- your team still blows.)
5. Their head coach's attitude. Sorry, but Norv Turner isn't the kind of guy that will get in your face if you screw up. Sure, those kinds of coaches are definitely easier to play for, but no one's going to get your ass in shape better than a guy who'll look you straight in the eye and say, "You're sucking out there."
We know Norv's an offensive mastermind -- the dude's playbook is easily one of the most dynamic, exciting and effective in the league. But while he's very smart, he's very vanilla at the same time.
My advice? GET TOUGH, NORV!
4. Their complacency. In case you guys didn't notice, the Chargers are notorious for slow starts. Like, seriously slow starts. Like, holy-crap-dude-the-light's-been-green-for-40-seconds slow.
That's very obvious and the players have recognized this since 2007, when Norv Turner first took over and the Chargers looked like garbage against the Chicago Bears and New England Patriots to start the season.
The team won't need a super-fast start to get them to a Super Bowl, but they'll need to know what players will contribute to deep playoff runs and which ones won't. Getting everything together early in the season and slacking mid-way (so long as they can regain momentum to finish the regular season) will be just fine for figuring out if they're championship-worthy.
3. Their lack of discipline. I can't spew out any hard numbers with this one because, well, you can't attach a number to discipline.
No, instead, we'll talk about the untimely penalties the Chargers had last season as well as the did-you-seriously-just-drop-that-floater catches the receivers dropped.
It was extremely frustrating watching guys like Malcolm Floyd and Richard Goodman consistently drop gimmes, and even more frustrating that the receivers -- whether they were natural receivers or who were simply about to be recipients of a Rivers' toss -- combined for 25 total fumbles, while they only forced 13 on their opponents.
Turnovers are key and the Chargers weren't able to keep that clean in 2010. They better recognize this in 2011.
2. Lack of a legitimate run game. Ever since LaDainian Tomlinson hit his downside and Philip Rivers became a friggin' stud, the Chargers' run game has been pretty abysmal -- we don't see the commitment to the run game anymore, making the Chargers absolutely one-dimensional.
Last year was probably the Bolts' worst year in terms of rushing and it's no coincidence that it was also the worst year they've had since they missed the postseason in 2005.
Ryan Mathews has looked awesome in the preseason, but is he as fragile as he proved to be in 2010?
1. Lack of toughness. It's difficult to quantify how tough is 'tough.' We'd like to think the Baltimore Ravens and Pittsburgh Steelers are tough, but they're probably mean bullies no one likes.
Stopping the run forcefully and hard running on offense are usually good indicators of toughness in this league, but that's not always the case; you wouldn't say the New York Jets are tough, but they are remarkably good at both of these things.
What they need is a bit more -- excuse my American -- cajones when tackling and more bravado when running. They need to get excited and mean, and as respectful as the Chargers have been the past two or three years, we'd like to see some nasty.
This FanPost was written by a member of the Bolts From The Blue community and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bolts From The Blue editors or SB Nation.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
number 1 on this list
should be missed field goals in the playoffs..
2010 Running game?
I think last year running game was much better than 2009.
Totally agree!
The running game in 2010 was like 15th in the league. I think in 2009 they were somewhere around 30th or 31st.
Which means despite the fact that Matthews was frequently injured the run game was dramatically better in 2010 than 2009.
I think the run game will be even better this year, and I believe Norv has demonstrated a commitment to run the ball.
Let's hope that Merriman
doesn’t find his groove at PR’s expense.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
Run The Ball Moar
Yes, this will guarantee a super bowl.
It’s hard to run when you’re behind by 2 scores.
It’s also hard to run when your backs either fumble repeatedly, or are hurt.
Norv doesn’t need to be tough, that’s what Greg Manusky is for. He’s been the same guy for 4 years, he probably won’t change.
Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say, 'Golly gee, I can't do that."
by Superduperboltman on Sep 8, 2011 9:25 AM PDT reply actions
Agreed, but ...
I still want to see Norv with a little more of a, um, testicular presence.
http://blog.thepigeontoe.com/ because I'm never shameless
by carlosatthetoe on Sep 9, 2011 3:05 AM PDT up reply actions
Agree with #3, #4, and #6. Disagree strongly with #2 and #5. #1 is debatable.
Tougher would be nicer, but that’s always true.
Obviously, the run game has declined since LT’s heyday. Duh: LT was the greatest halfback of the SB era. But Mathews/Tolbert last year was much better than LT ’09, or even LT ’08.
The ‘09 Chargers had the most disciplined offense in football history. Floyd’s drops were outliers, Goodman’s silliness was rookie jitters. I agree discipline was a problem, but I suspect it’s been fixed.
I don’t know if it’s “complacency” – I don’t know what it is, but I agree with you on the principle. No more slow starts! Energy waxes and wanes. It’s great to be waxing in December, but I think they only got the tempo really right in ’08. Yes, that year: freakish bad luck was all that kept them from going 10-6 (even counting that they should have split with KC) and looking like the contenders they were.
You’re wrong about Turner. He’s got lots of fire. He’s just not very dramatic.
You’re right about the schedule, mostly. Buffalo will surprise you: I have them sniffing around .500 this year. Fortunately, KC, Denver, and Oakland have the same problem… but if you’re just arguing that it’ll be hard to earn a bye or WC berth, I agree: we need to be great to earn a bye and better than the rest of the division to earn the #3 or #4 seed, and have no hope if we can’t win the division.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Sep 9, 2011 9:18 AM PDT reply actions
Slight exaggeration on "most disciplined offense in football history"
But very low penalty yardage, few drops or dumb mistakes.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Sep 9, 2011 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions
We know Norv’s an offensive mastermind — the dude’s playbook is easily one of the most dynamic, exciting and effective in the league. But while he’s very smart, he’s very vanilla at the same time.
My advice? GET TOUGH, NORV!
Norv is who is he is. He has been coaching since 1976 and a head coach for 13 years. I don’t think he is suddenly going to change his whole demeanor and approach on the eve of his 14th season, and hoping he will is probably going to leave you disappointed. That said, he isn’t all puppy dog on the sidelines. I’ve seen him tear into players and refs plenty of times. I think his off-field reputation as a good guy affects how he is viewed as a head coach.
What they need is a bit more — excuse my American — cajones when tackling
Also disagree with this, I think. I’m not entirely sure what you have in mind when you say this, so I’ll just say that I’d rather see good, disciplined tackling technique. Making a conscious effort to try to blow people up is a great way to miss tackles and give up big plays.
Well ...
If you’ve seen Eric Weddle tackle, it’s really something — the guy literally stops, hugs the ball-carrier and brings him down. He never uses his momentum to make a huge play, and we both know how big hits can translate to momentum shifts. I think guys like Takeo Spikes and Bob Sanders should help us with that.
I agree with the Norv Turner deal. I don’t expect him to change entirely, but I expect his demeanor to become more aggressive and act like he wants it a little more. He needs to tighten things up, and that doesn’t mean he needs to change who he is; that just means he needs to be tougher on the guys on the field.
http://blog.thepigeontoe.com/ because I'm never shameless
by carlosatthetoe on Sep 9, 2011 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions
Okay, I see your point about the tackling.
I didn’t want to put words in your mouth before, so I was sort of saying what I didn’t want it to mean. I agree that there is a way to make a sound tackle in a forceful way.
i agree
With both of you. I’ve seen many timjes when the defender clobbered the ball carrier only to have the guy bounce off and keep going. I’ve also seen many times when they try to arm tackle and the guy slips out of their grip. So yeah, basic fundamental technique. Wrap him up and drag him down.
First off this team is to committed to the run
Even when this team is getting the power O and the dives plastered, they keep getting into 2nd 9, remember the chargers were 11th in pass attempts, how many coaches with Rivers would be like the saints and throw it 55 times. Norv is committed to the running game, until he falls behind.
The biggest key facing the chargers, is to stop the run, get ahead and get the chargers of their pro formation balanced offense. When they can run, play from ahead they are awesome, they are fragile in their psyche and not very good playing from behind.
Norv is Norv, dude is really smart play caller, and excellent and adjustments, but is cautious and tentative in how he calls early in games, and it seeps into his players. They come out tentative as well, like a boxer who is willing to lose round 1 & 2, to get to know his opponent. Don’t agree with the strategy, prefer to come out no huddle 85% throwing get a score and play from ahead, that my mentality.
This team has to grow up in mental toughness, don’t get down when they fall behind, and keep playing with focus. And also find the killer instinct from the start, this team has given up one 9 point lead in the last 2 years. This team once they are ahead, they stay ahead.
They're good at comebacks too.
They just have to make too many of them.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Sep 9, 2011 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Once they hit their stride they keep playing well
The problem, the Zenyatta kick was to late to win the game. The chargers reality: come of flat, fall behind, have a moment of panic (fumbled punt, pick 6, choose your moment). The return of calm, plow forward, win close or lose close. Or start out like a ball of fire and the blow the other team out.
Do you know what youre talking about?
Not commited to the run? 2010 the worst rushing year? Man just go back and look at 09. Second to last in YPG and dead last in YPA. Mathews and Tolbert were an entire half league better than LT and sproles with the return of Harwick to the roster.
"Used to sit 36P until the Chargers started winning. Ill take V seating anyday"
by traceSD on Sep 9, 2011 7:56 PM PDT via mobile reply actions



































