Philip Rivers comes up 4th in AP Offensive Player of the Year Award
Based on the award title alone, "Offensive Player of the Year," you’d expect Ben Roethlisberger or Brett Favre to be in the running, but the AP doesn’t mean that kind of "offensive." No, they meant "offensive" as in, "the best NFL player who plays for the offense." I bet you now feel as silly as I did once I figured that out.
Now that we have that bit of confusion out of the way, we can move on and talk about the Associated Press Player of the Year awards.
I’ll start out by saying that no Chargers received Defensive Player of the Year votes.
That brings us back to the Offensive Player of the Year. It should come as no surprise that Tom Brady, along with his flowing locks, ran away with the award this year. Brady received nearly twice as many votes as Michael Vick, the second-place finisher.
Find out who else got votes, and more, after the break.
Below is the chart of players receiving votes, with 50 votes being up for grabs:
| Position | Player | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| QB | Tom Brady | 21 |
| QB | Michael Vick | 11 |
| RB | Arian Foster | 7 |
| QB | Philip Rivers | 5 |
| WR | Roddy White | 2 |
| QB | Aaron Rodgers | 2 |
| WR | DeSean Jackson | 2 |
The list doesn’t really bother me all that much, nor does it surprise me one bit. Brady may not have lead the league in every category this year, Philip Rivers had more yards, more completions, and a higher completion percentage (albeit by a mere 0.1%). What makes Brady most impressive though is the fact he had 36 touchdowns, against only 4 interceptions. Brady also broke the record for most consecutive completions without an interception this year. Oh yeah, and there's that little bit about him playing on the East Coast. A lot of people argue that Brady is successful because the New England offensive system around him calls for more short, low-risk passes. That may be, but it works and gets the job done in New England.
Michael Vick doesn’t really surprise me much either. He was this year’s media darling, being trotted out in lead stories on sports shows across the nation, showing him running up and down the field, making passes and dashing into the end zone. There was certainly a concerted effort to get the public to forget about his troubled past, and say, "Dogs? shmogs! Hey look, this guy can play quarterback good and stuff!"
Arian Foster exploded into the limelight in the very first game of the 2010 season when he ran all over the Indianapolis Colts for 231 yards and 3 touchdowns. He didn’t slow down much from there, as he ended the season leading the league in both total yards and touchdowns, while averaging nearly 5 yards per carry and 101 yards per game.
That brings us to Philip Rivers. What more can be said that hasn’t been said already by us here? Thanks to injuries in the receiving corps, Philip Rivers ended up completing passes to 17 different receivers this year; including touchdown passes to 14 different receivers. That’s pretty impressive in its own right. Add to the fact that Rivers was able to lead the league in total yards with a decimated receiving corps, and a 101.8 passer rating, makes it all the more impressive.
The Chargers had to come from behind often this year, which would account for the high number of total yards for Rivers. But it’s still impressive he was even able to get all that yardage and complete those passes in high-stress, and many times high-risk, situations.
We could argue that Philip deserved to garner more votes than he did, but given the competition this year, and the fact that this is the media voting on the award, the positioning comes as no surprise to this writer.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Had he thrown 2 fewer picks
and won 1 or 2 more games, I think he could have won. Brady also had about 7 potential INT’s dropped towards the last 6 games of the year. Whatever.
Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say, 'Golly gee, I can't do that."
by Superduperboltman on Feb 2, 2011 11:53 AM PST reply actions
If he had gotten the Bolts to the playoffs
I would say this is a sham. Rivers is a flat out stud, but if the team doesn’t at least make it to the playoffs, he won’t get any love.
Mamba, Mr. Intangible, Candyman, Spainard, Bynumite, Ron-Ron, Luuuuke, Breezy, Blakers, neck-tattoo contributor
Fair or not, I agree
It always bugs me when the outcome of individual awards depends so much on team performance
The thong is, it happened.
It's a team game
and this sort of practice helps to counter the “look at me” culture the NFL has developed, so I’m fine with it.
by Cake or Death on Feb 2, 2011 6:30 PM PST up reply actions
Arian Foster
got more votes than PR. Where did Houston’s season end?
Whatever – IMO, most of these awards have become popularity contests.
Give PR Miss Congeniality. Means about as much.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
by Buck Melanoma on Feb 2, 2011 3:35 PM PST up reply actions
phillip rivers
he needs to win us a superbowl that will make him #1
by vasquez_kristopher on Feb 2, 2011 1:22 PM PST reply actions
Is this your way of criticizing the apparent standards for winning postseason awards,
or do you legitimately feel that Rivers alone is accountable for the team’s performance?
superbowls make you popular..
win us one phillip rivers
by vasquez_kristopher on Feb 2, 2011 6:11 PM PST up reply actions
That's not really an answer to my question.
You essentially repeated your comment above.
by SDzeke on Feb 2, 2011 10:01 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I always thought that
OPOY and DPOY are supposed to be independent of team record, for example Chris Johnson last year won but his team was crappy. In that sense the number of games the Chargers won shouldn’t make a difference, as these awards are based almost soley on statistics. MVP however, is another story.
The problem in this case
to me is that not only did the Patriots have a better season, but Brady had the better stats also.
C. Johnson was a bit different last season as the numbers he put up were huge. He had almost 600 more yards rushing than anybody else in the league. I think he was so far ahead of the other RBs in the league that they felt like he had to get an award.
I agree with you on Brady
My main point was to make the case that it’s about stats only.
by SJO on Feb 3, 2011 7:52 AM PST up reply actions
media bias
yep, have to agree that unless you put up far superior numbers, then it all comes down to popularity (and east coast bias) anyone remember marshall faul and the heisman award? You tell me that if faulk had played for one of the big name schools he doesn’t win the heisman? If I remember correctly, gino torretta won the heisman and was a bust in the nfl. Rivers isn’t a media darling. He plays for San Diego, so ain’t gonna get no love there. Had he played for the jets or giants, colts, patriots or steelers, he gets more votes imo. (putting up the same numbers)
It's not just media bias
There is a reason Tom Brady is in the media, as he is a known figure playing in 4 superbowls. How many has Rivers played in? So should the media really create all this hype around an unknown figure in Rivers?
by SJO on Feb 3, 2011 7:53 AM PST up reply actions
They sure do like to bark up the "Rivers is a loudmouthed whiney jerk who yells at fans" tree fairly often
"Los Angeles is like San Diego’s older, uglier sister that has herpes." - Justin Halpern
I'm confused.
At first you say that postseason awards voting is based on media bias alone, but then go on to describe how the winner of this years OPOY is a much more prominent figure.
Are you asserting that the correlation is just coincidence, or are you willing to concede that media recognition does play some part in the voting process?
Also, are you trying to claim that Super Bowl appearances are the only way to garner the recognition of the media?
My point is
At least this year, I believe it’s coinsidence, and no, superbowls are not the only way to get in the media, but it is a way for the media/national fans to begin recognizing you, and subsequently following you around for other issues.
Then I am going to have to disagree.
As much as they shouldn’t, I believe that national recognition and team performance do factor into how postseason award recipients are decided. No matter what the sport.
Voters don’t exist in a vacuum, they can be influenced to ignore the original intent of an award. And it seems like it happens all too frequently with sports awards

by 

































