Is It Time to Reconsider Norv Turner and AJ Smith?
After three consecutive impressive victories, some people are starting to wonder if maybe we got ahead of ourselves a month ago when we called for Norv Turner and A.J. Smith to be fired "no matter what". Maybe the circumstances were simply wrong and now they're being made right.
Here's what the 2011 San Diego Chargers have had to deal with:
- Losing their highest paid defensive player (Luis Castillo) in Week 1.
- Losing their Kicker (Nate Kaeding) in Week 1.
- Losing 3 Linebackers that were expected to contribute (Jonas Mouton, Stephen Cooper, Larry English) early on in the season.
- Losing their Pro Bowl LT (Marcus McNeill) and Pro Bowl LG (Kris Dielman).
- Losing their starting SS and key offseason free agent acquisition (Bob Sanders) early on.
- Having their Pro Bowl TE (Antonio Gates) miss games or play at half-speed (without practice) due to injury.
- Having their top two WRs (Vincent Jackson, Malcom Floyd) miss games and plenty of practice time due to injury.
- Having their Pro Bowl QB (Philip Rivers) go through the worst 6-game stretch of his career without any real explanation.
- Having a brand new Defensive Coordinator and new Special Teams coach, without the benefit of an offseason to install their schemes.
108 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
my 2 cents...
Unless we sneak into the playoffs and make a run at the superbowl I’d like to see both AJ and Norv (who i’ve supported sadly enough) have to go. We can’t accept 9-7 and no playoffs on consecutive seasons.
by Ino (BoltsFanInBakersfield) on Dec 19, 2011 2:11 PM PST reply actions
I agree.
If this was a one-time scenario then I’d be more understanding, but when this has been happening for consecutive seasons, there’s obviously a pattern showing.
In December, the Chargers are always hot with Norv as the coach, but what about every other month?
I don’t know about getting rid of AJ, though. He’s been having crappy drafts, but most of the guys he picks up in free agency have really contributed.
Situation still fluid
But if they sneak into playoffs, probably the wild card seems more likely than the division, then a matchup with the Texans in the first round looks very favorable. If they make the divisional round, my guess is Norv and AJ keep their jobs, anything less the ax must fall.
true...although a retro 2008 donkey collapse would be best...
It would be mandatory for me to attend any home playoff game
by Ino (BoltsFanInBakersfield) on Dec 19, 2011 2:20 PM PST up reply actions
I like that you have them separated
This situation damns AJ more than Norv. I believe it shows Norv can get it done with the right players, and that AJ simply hasn’t provided the depth we need.
Frankly I’m tired of seeing ex-chargers kill it on other teams (look at top 10 QB/WR/RB lists and you’ll see what I mean) and knowing that the draft picks we used to replace them could have given us depth, or filled other key positions.
Keep Norv, Fire AJ.
Agreed completely
I am tired of him thinking he is the smartest guy in the room and being a hardball prick with contracts. His last few drafts haven’t attained the necessary pieces we need since his FA pickups can’t stay healthy. Adios AJ
actually
the last few drafts have been excellent. It was the stinkers from 2007-2009 that were disappointing. (and if you squint just right at 2009, it’s starting to actually look ok with Vasquez, Martin, and Green)
by Stephen (shaynes41) on Dec 19, 2011 3:12 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
It also doesn't help that
your 2007 and 2009 drafts picks we’re made of glass and just didn’t work out
I hate scooter pie
by Lmbs2slaghtr on Dec 19, 2011 3:17 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Well you could also argue
that AJ found a way to fill up holes that were created by (unlucky) injuries. I’m thinking about guys like Gaither, Harrison,etc. To me it seems like a lot of the losing in 2011 was the result of stupid mistakes, bad luck and stuff like that. I’m not entirely convinced that those are things Smith and Norv can do all that much about. If anything I think Norv should be able to do more about those things than AJ.
But then again, this is only the 2nd season that I’m following the Chargers and the NFL closely so what do I know :)
by sixpakfrombelgium on Dec 19, 2011 2:46 PM PST up reply actions
You could also say
AJ built the right team, they’re just never healthy. Which is basically what I’ve always said about Buster and English.
Bolts from the Blue - Destroying your opinions with facts.
by John Gennaro on Dec 19, 2011 4:13 PM PST up reply actions
Gaither and Harris worked out well
but in reality, Gaither and Harris were on the top of the league’s trash heap and have been playing their tails off to try and stay in the league. I have found it interesting that Gaither seems to be playing than Mc’Neil in the past three games than McNeil had in any three game stretch this season. That may be the story coming out of this season; a new starting tackle for the Bolts going into next year.
North Texas REALLY needs a Rubio's franchise.
by SDNativeinTX on Dec 19, 2011 6:44 PM PST up reply actions
jesus
stop with the whole drew brees thing. he was broken and he was terrible before the chargers drafted rivers.
michael turner? you wanted to keep him over LT back in the day? At any rate, Mathews’ numbers this year compare well to Turner’s
and Wes Welker? Well, no one saw that coming. You’re a damned liar if you say you did. He didn’t do all that much for 3 years and then exploded when he showed up on a team with Tom Brady.
by BORTZ on Dec 19, 2011 4:29 PM PST up reply actions 8 recs
Also, Welker was a Schottenheimer decision.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 19, 2011 5:10 PM PST up reply actions
I totally agree with you. Let’s forget facts and live on impressions is the lifeblood of the complainer here. Brees was injured and was only interviewed by Miami and New Orleans. He was a tremendous risk. If we signed him, we would have had to franchise him. Adn we had rivers.
Turner wanted to start. Aj told him the truth. If you stay with us, you will be a back-up.
Instead of complaining about who has left… look at what he has brought us off the trash heap. Ddi anybody else think Burnett would be great? How about Garay? Or Gaither?
Thank you.
Ultimately that’s what I hate about the “Fire AJ” crowd: the selective memory. Lest anyone forget that it was AJ who built this overall winning team in the first place. Without AJ building this team over the last 8 years, we wouldn’t be in any position to be demanding a championship.
"The only thing I hate more than Raiders fans is Chargers fans." - A Chargers fan
Gaslamp Ball Wiki - All you need to know about Gaslamp Ball, its members, and all the inside jokes
Bolts from the Blue
there's no selective memory here
the fact that AJ has to find talent “OFF THE STREET” is not very encouraging. either you believe in the talent you drafted, or you don’t.
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!
Nobody is perfect
AJ has had some spectacular drafts, and yes some drafts have not been that great. But he’s been able to put together a team year-in-and-year-out that has at the very least been able to compete.
"The only thing I hate more than Raiders fans is Chargers fans." - A Chargers fan
Gaslamp Ball Wiki - All you need to know about Gaslamp Ball, its members, and all the inside jokes
Bolts from the Blue
Both gotta go, especially with the potential to have back to back seasons of not making the playoffs
Also with the fact that all of the other teams have changed QB’s at some point. Not to mention the Chiefs fired their head coach and yet here we are.
"Rob Johnson does not suck" --me
"Norf is straight up awesome on b-holes out there."--TheThinGwynn (sort of)
"I hate Rob Johnson's stupid face"-- sdchicken
I can't imagine firing one and not the other....
i’d be willing to bet that any incoming GM would want to hire his own guy at head coach
by Ino (BoltsFanInBakersfield) on Dec 19, 2011 2:52 PM PST reply actions
Have a rec.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 19, 2011 3:34 PM PST up reply actions
The meme continues!
"The biggest thing..." - Norv Turner
by Cake or Death on Dec 19, 2011 6:44 PM PST up reply actions
All I know...
is that I’m sick and tired of this SAME PATTERN repeating itself over and over and over again. Norv continues to hide behind excuses. Or, more accurately, he GETS to hide behind excuses. Extenuating circumstances keep happening that allow him (and the team) to make admittedly valid excuses for why he should stay.
Here’s the real question to ask yourself: if Norv stays, do you HONESTLY, SERIOUSLY think that the exact same thing won’t happen again next year?? That come October and November, we’ll be screaming for Norv’s head, and then in December, they make some ridiculous run at the playoffs either to fall short or to get in and get destroyed in the first round?? Face it — it’s a never-ending cycle. Cut off the head NOW!
by Andy (allfield) on Dec 19, 2011 3:08 PM PST reply actions
I still remember what he did with a healthy squad in 2007 (before losing his top 3 players in the playoffs).
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 19, 2011 3:35 PM PST up reply actions 4 recs
But like the players say. that was whole different team, this team is all new...
the only thing that hasn’t changed, is Norv.
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!
2007?
If memory serves me correctly, in 2007, the Bolts finished worse under Norv then the year before under Marty. Sure, we made it to the AFC champ game, but we lost that and it has gotten worse and worse every year after. Don’t get me wrong, I like Norv and I vote for him to stay, but like Andy said above, how much longer can we put up with this schizophrenic style of play, and are we going to go through this same nonsense next year at this time.
The Ultimate Schizophrenia
Acknowledging “schizophrenic style of play,” acknowledging that we’ll go through the “same nonsense next year,” yet voting for it to continue. :)) Now THAT’S schizophrenic!
by Andy (allfield) on Dec 19, 2011 3:53 PM PST up reply actions
in 2007, the Bolts finished worse under Norv then the year before under Marty.
Facing a first place schedule.
Bolts from the Blue - Destroying your opinions with facts.
by John Gennaro on Dec 19, 2011 4:14 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs
That's only a difference of two games
I hate scooter pie
by Lmbs2slaghtr on Dec 19, 2011 4:17 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
They still won, what 11 in a row.
and then two playoff games, where Philip Rivers AND LT got injured, thus hamstringing the Charger’s offense so it lost to the then undefeated Pats. That isn’t too bad.
by Ferguson1015 on Dec 19, 2011 5:09 PM PST up reply actions
How does making it further in the playoffs equate to worse?
by Rich Garcia's defective eyes on Dec 19, 2011 6:10 PM PST up reply actions
Well, you see. You start with a conclusion and work backwards.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 19, 2011 7:00 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
To early
No need to worry about it now, lets just see how the season ends and evaluate it from there.
by cameronm on Dec 19, 2011 4:04 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Hmmm
I think Norv did a good job of building an offensive game plan situated squarely around Philip Rivers in a similar fashion that Marty did with LT. That being said, our defense has never developed to the same extent as our offense has, and that also is on Norv. “Offense wins games, defense wins championships.” I have seen some development in the aggression of Norv on the offensive end as well, but that is probably due to their lowly record. I think the defense is developing(depth-wise and new scheme-wise) though, so I am OK with what I have seen out of the coaching staff this year.
by Falawful on Dec 19, 2011 4:45 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Defense was pretty good last year
They just couldn’t get to the playoffs
by Ferguson1015 on Dec 19, 2011 5:10 PM PST up reply actions
Defense was one of the best in the NFL last season? Special Teams ruined that season.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 19, 2011 5:11 PM PST up reply actions
Our defensive numbers were bloated because of Special Teams
Though I agree they were good, they weren’t elite. Specifically, I remember the games against the Raiders and the Bengals, where the blame really could be squarely placed on the defense for dropping their aggression(in the Raiders game), which allowed Raiders to come back and eventually steal the game.
In contrast, I would argue that our offense IS elite. I just want to see a continuously aggressive defense, ala the Saints or the Packers, though I know the personnel might not be quite there yet.
On a per play basis (DVOA) they were one of the top defensive teams in the league.
I assure you I wasn’t referring to raw yardage totals when I said they were one of the best.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 19, 2011 6:08 PM PST up reply actions
final scores are winners, stats are for losers.
the only stat that matters was 9-7, no playoff.
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!
When discussing the quality of a particular unit, team win-loss records are how we should grade them?
That’s asinine.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 20, 2011 8:06 AM PST up reply actions
it's moronic to do other wise.
it’s about wins and loses, stats do not win championships or get you into the playoffs, do they.
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!
.

"The only thing I hate more than Raiders fans is Chargers fans." - A Chargers fan
Gaslamp Ball Wiki - All you need to know about Gaslamp Ball, its members, and all the inside jokes
Bolts from the Blue
Pretty sure he is.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 22, 2011 9:08 AM PST up reply actions
Actually...
Who sez WE CAN"T accept 9-7 and no playoffs? Who is “WE?” And what does"WE" know about the realities of organizing and managing a professional football team? I have yet to hear one clear alternative to what is currently in place. And if you try and suggest the rotted decay of a Bill Cowher or Jon Gruden, you just want change for the sake of change without the monetary obligation of footing the bill. Now. The reality is. Your All-Time Hero was a real stinker this year and is solely responsible for the missed opportunities this team may now realize at the end of the year. Stay the course and (Hey Philip – can you handle a snap (Norv’s Fault), can you throw a pass away without it being intercepted (Norv’s Fault), can you show up in September with the rest of the league (Norv’s Fault)?) We, “WE” must stop scapegoating simply because “WE” do not understand the intricacies of Professional Football known in these parts as the NFL. Why the drama?
And if anyone, ANYONE, tries to blame Norv for Philip River’s pathetic attempt to play qb this year, only goes to prove my point. Thank you, and Good Night Gracie.
Well said.
However… At some point, after years of failed mediocrity where there should have been success (according to the perception and PR delivered by the team itself), someONE must foot the blame.
Yes, crazy, wacky extenuating circumstances did exist (fumbled snaps, poor unexplained play by perennial Pro Bowl players), but accountability has to be taken. Excuses are like a-holes: everyone has one, but they’re filthy no matter how much you try to dress them up.
by Andy (allfield) on Dec 19, 2011 4:54 PM PST up reply actions
You might want to consider improving your personal hygiene practices.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 19, 2011 5:13 PM PST up reply actions 4 recs
this run has been awesome
Makes watching the Bolts fun again, which it was not until three games ago.
My knock on Turner:
The good: His strategy seems to combine deep threats with solid running. When it clicks, it is awesome to watch as we have seen. He designs good plays that create med to deep passing options and can still run.
My issue: when that is not working, because of injury or a clever defense, he does not adapt well. In the Oakland game I was so frustrated that he was still calling 7 step drops without a functional LT. The result was predictable.
And in high-tension situations, like close games and playoffs, he tends to retreat to those things he feels most comfortable, getting predictable and risk averse and horrible at clock management.
So I love it when it clicks (that 13-3 regular season was a thing of beauty) but I cannot see him getting past a really well designed defense in the playoffs or able to adapt to injuries. So I would can him with someone who does not have those faults. Not a Cowher or some re-tread, but someone intelligent and creative. Not that I trust Spanos to know who that is.
I hope they make it to give him one more shot to make a deep run.
Turner's offense is not built around creativity
It is built off of execution, which only works when the pieces are in place to execute well. He does game-plan to come into games, but one of the biggest reasons that AJ picked Norv as the head coach instead of Shotty (other than circumstances already explained in detail) was because AJ wanted someone who was good at making adjustments at half-time. Are you telling me that you haven’t seen the Chargers come out of the locker-room at halftime and improved? I know we have also seen the opposite, but that is because other coaches also gameplan during halftime. Sometimes you see something that might be worth exploiting only to have the other team mix things up so it isn’t worth it anymore.
by Ferguson1015 on Dec 19, 2011 5:17 PM PST up reply actions
You create your own luck
Through hard work and discipline, see Tebow. There is a reason why Norv’s chargers are always so “unlucky”. AJ gave Norv plenty of good players at key positions. Anybody who wants to keep Norv please go watch the Denver game again, absolutely inexcusable play calling.
by nunz on Dec 19, 2011 4:51 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Ridiculous.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 19, 2011 5:14 PM PST up reply actions
Is your name Gabriel García Márquez?
I love absurdism.
"Were such things here as we do speak about?
Or have we eaten on the insane root
That takes the reason prisoner?"
In defense of Norv in the Denver game
Pretty much every coach Tebow beat in that 6 game winning streak made dumbass calls. I mean, Rex Ryan bringing a full blitz against a running QB? Dumbest call ever.
"The biggest thing..." - Norv Turner
by Cake or Death on Dec 19, 2011 9:43 PM PST up reply actions
Flawed? ridiculous? absurd?
all i know, that HC John Fox beat HC Norv Turner with an inferior QB and team.
or are we conceding that PR is an inferior QB and the Chargers roster is filled with underachievers?
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!
In a word: No.
What we’ve got here is an abusive relationship. Sure, there have been some good times, but there has also been the constant abuse that has now gotten worse as the relationship progresses. Looking at the last 3 games and saying “oh, well maybe we were wrong about these guys” is like saying “well he’s been so sweet lately maybe he doesn’t mean it when he pushes me down the stairs.”
As good as it feels right now to see the team clicking and blowing out a good team like the Ravens (and believe me, it feels GREAT), it doesn’t excuse the complete failure that was the six game losing streak. It doesn’t excuse sitting at home in January last year. It doesn’t excuse being in a situation where we once again do not control our own fate to make the playoffs.
You can pull out any excuse you want to try to explain why this team is so frustratingly inconsistent and unpredictable, but the bottom line is that the Chargers have slowly but surely regressed since they were the indisputable “Class of the AFC West” and, under Norv, will predictably choose a portion of the season in which to underperform every year. AJ took his shot(s) at pushing this team over the hump by drafting for need while we still had the talent but while we once again stand at the edge of maybe, possibly sneaking our way into the playoffs due to the sheer incompetence of the teams around us I think we have to step back and take a look at the last 5 years and make an honest assessment of where this thing is going. And it ain’t up.
I understand how tough it is to find a good head coach in this league, and I’m not delusional enough to think that if we fire Norv and hire someone else that it means a trip to the Super Bowl next year, but I think a change has to be made while we still have one of the most important aspects of a successful football team going for us: an elite QB behind center. As long as Rivers is there and healthy, we’ll have a shot every year… but Norv has already had his with this team.
by classicmfk on Dec 19, 2011 5:10 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
I voted to keep both.
The way the proverbial cookie has crumbled for the Chargers over the past few years reminds me of a process and outcome matrix, explained very well by a former Padres exec here. As long as I continue to believe that we’re in the Good Process half, I refuse to panic and give up on current decision-makers.
by Rich Garcia's defective eyes on Dec 19, 2011 6:17 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
Rec'd for citing DePodesta.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 19, 2011 7:01 PM PST up reply actions
Good, good stuff.

Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 19, 2011 7:04 PM PST up reply actions
But couldn't one argue that the Outcome determines whether the Process is Good or Bad?
Ultimately, Outcome is the only thing that is not subjective. But Process is completely subjective — unless you say it’s good simply because it produced a good outcome.
by Andy (allfield) on Dec 19, 2011 10:32 PM PST up reply actions
Not exactly.
If the process is bad, then the outcome will be bad more often than not.
If the process is good, then the outcome will be good more often than not.
If we consider AJ+Norv to be our process, how many years has the process produced a good outcome vs a bad outcome? The subjective part in this case is what constitutes a good or bad outcome. Are we saying the only good outcome is winning the Super Bowl? I don’t think so because there are multiple teams with a good process that do not win the Super Bowl on a regular basis. I believe a good outcome is making the playoffs. Based on that, AJ+Norv have hit a good outcome at a 75% clip so far, which leads me to believe that the 25% was a bad break. Obviously the outcome of this season will alter those numbers either way, but even if we miss the playoffs again it will be 60/40 in favor of good process. This is a very rudimentary example, but I think it holds up when you break things down further and look at what went right/wrong in each season.
by Rich Garcia's defective eyes on Dec 19, 2011 11:41 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
My point is that one man’s “good process” is another man’s “boneheaded style.” What determines whether the process is good? More often than not, the proof is in the pudding. I.E., the Outcome answers the debate regarding the process.
by Andy (allfield) on Dec 20, 2011 7:19 AM PST up reply actions
"Boneheaded style" has nothing to do with it.
As I explained above, a good process is most easily identified by the frequency of good outcomes. Look at the blackjack example: repeatedly hitting on 17 will yield many more bad outcomes than good, so we can tell it’s a bad process. The reverse is also true: repeatedly standing on 17 will yield many more good outcomes than bad, so we can tell it’s a good process.
by Rich Garcia's defective eyes on Dec 20, 2011 6:50 PM PST up reply actions
Oh, I see...
So you’re using the outcome to determine whether it was a good process. Ahhh… Interesting. Wish I’da thought of that…
by Andy (allfield) on Dec 20, 2011 7:35 PM PST up reply actions
No.
DePodesta’s example of hitting on 17 (a bad process) and getting a four (a good result) cannot be classified as good process.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 20, 2011 8:07 AM PST up reply actions
Oh, so "process" equals "odds"
The odds of getting a 4 or lower is incrediblly bad, therefore, the process of trying (or hoping) to get one is bad. Okay, that makes sense. But what about in a subjective world? What about “coaching?” What about “evaluating players?” How can you or anyone determine if it’s a good or bad process? Wait — I have an idea! Wait until the outcome!
by Andy (allfield) on Dec 20, 2011 9:07 AM PST up reply actions
Outcomes help explain the value of a process.
That does not mean they determine it.
by Rich Garcia's defective eyes on Dec 20, 2011 6:56 PM PST up reply actions
Okay, so....
If the Chargers fire Norv and hire a new coach, and that new coach wins — with the exact same players — does that help us to conclude that Norv’s process was bad?
by Andy (allfield) on Dec 20, 2011 7:36 PM PST up reply actions
Where
is the option Norv should stay as offensive coordinator and Jeff Fisher can take over as head coach/ defensive coach.
In the “dreamers gonna dream” file. This would be awesome.
Narrator: I am Jack's smirking revenge.
by TecateBoltsFan on Dec 19, 2011 6:45 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
You can keep Fisher
I’d rather not have the Chargers become one of the dirtiest teams in the league.
"The only thing I hate more than Raiders fans is Chargers fans." - A Chargers fan
Gaslamp Ball Wiki - All you need to know about Gaslamp Ball, its members, and all the inside jokes
Bolts from the Blue
by creanium on Dec 19, 2011 7:02 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Atleast then
we would have an identity other than being “soft and full of talent”
I personally have never seen the "soft" thing
yeah I know this is primarily an offensive football team, but it is made from many physical parts. Most of the running plays are power runs (rather than deceptions), Most of the top receivers are tall and physical, Mathews and Tolbert both have punishing styles, Even looking at Football Outsider’s metrics (taken season-long) the offensive line is ranked 8th in “Power Rank” and 3rd in “Stuffed Rank” (1st being the best in both catagories).
The only place I might see the logic of it is on defense, and even there it doesn’t look very soft. For one, the Chargers’ corners are meant to help out in the running game and are built out of more power than finesse. It isn’t like the defense is built around speed like the Colt’s defense.
I just don’t see it
by Ferguson1015 on Dec 20, 2011 12:17 PM PST up reply actions
I voted to get rid of them both
Norv’s terrible game management has cost us two games this season. AJ has dug himself several holes on this team that need to be filled. As head of football operations, AJ is responsible for the conditioning coaches and training staff, both of which have done terrible jobs of getting guys trained to avoid getting hurt in this first place and then caring for them after they were hurt. The handling of the Dielman situation, keeping Castillo on the active roster for way too many weeks, not getting Gates care for his foot before the bargaining agreement went bye-bye — that alone should get a GM on the hot seat.
North Texas REALLY needs a Rubio's franchise.
by SDNativeinTX on Dec 19, 2011 6:38 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
By the way! Everyone, I did the math.
If the Chargers win out, AND the Jets lose to the Dolphins or the Broncos lose both of their last games, the Chargers would enter the playoffs riding a 5 game win streak, hitting on all cylinders. If the Broncos lose both games, we get a home playoff game to boot. Jets beating the Giants next week does not affect our chances.
I still think both AJ and Norv should go sans winning the Super Bowl.
Narrator: I am Jack's smirking revenge.
Are you sure?
The Jets beat us (gag). Wouldn’t they win the tiebreaker over us if we had the same record? I think the Jets have to lose out.
Not in a 3-team tie.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 20, 2011 2:26 PM PST up reply actions
Norv still has to go
AJ can stay for another season but Norv has to go after this season.
by SDBear on Dec 19, 2011 7:22 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Too Early to roll heads (from New Delhi, India)
Watching Bolts from distance far is fun & frustration combo (Online I mean). I think there were mixture of things that caused Chargers debacle midway through the season. I have more faith in coach we have than a new coach and 2 – 3 years of rebuilding new offense/defense. Let’s see how we fair in last games left.
Winning is the cure all. If the chargers win out, however unlikely that is (@ Det, @Oak) then they are welcome to stay one more year, and see if the injuries/lockout/new coordinators were the reason for this once again mediocre season.
We have seen what this team is capable of if healthy, if we can hit this draft, get a bit of luck no one knows what can happen.
Wait a second...
Didn’t you post this exact response last year?? Or does it just feel like it? Because the language certainly applies. And what if it applies again next year? And the year after that? And the year after that? When is enough enough?? Just askin’…
by Andy (allfield) on Dec 20, 2011 9:09 AM PST up reply actions
'Bye AJ
You’ve had long enough.
Norv, you’re on the 1 yr. leash.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
Time to move on...
we’ve seen this before. there is nothing that convinces me, over the last 5 seasons, to believe the next season will be different. The players have changed, but Norv and AJ are the two constants.
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!
I agree that
A J has drafted too many “reaches” that didn’t pan out. So, see ya A J. And, the chargers having their “slow starts” then having to win out AND hope others lose to reach the playoffs is getting old. Also, not impressed with manusky’s defense. perhaps the lockout influenced that, but niners fans weren’t sorry to see him go. Hmmm.
The Thing is...
This happens every year.
Norv had this team at their peak and couldn’t win, he has had 4 years and disappointed every time.
The fact of the matter is this team should be doing a whole lot better than it is now, even considering the injury situation. Too many times we’ve been out-coached or thrown games away, it’s time for a change.
As for AJ, i’m still not sure. If we don’t make the playoffs then probably he should go too.
They didn't win "at their peak" because Rivers and Tomlinson both got hurt in the playoffs. Clearly Turner's fault.
Bolts from the Blue // "At least when Wade is spewing vitriol he does so with an intellectual flair." - insanebolt21
Bloody Elbow // "I think we're poking fun at Leland's 'boner.'" - Michael Fagan
by Richard Wade on Dec 20, 2011 8:11 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Not Turner
SAPNOS
"The only thing I hate more than Raiders fans is Chargers fans." - A Chargers fan
Gaslamp Ball Wiki - All you need to know about Gaslamp Ball, its members, and all the inside jokes
Bolts from the Blue

On the other hand, you have different fingers.
by Hormel on Dec 20, 2011 11:59 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Don't forget
Merriman and Gates were also injured. There’s no way an aging Bruschi covers Gates one on one the whole game without Gates being seriously injured.
That game was cursed. Keading hits 4 playoff field goals under horrible weather conditions and we still lose.
Yeah your right. they didn't win with the #1 rated Defense an Offense either...
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!
We were lucky that the Ravens have their own coaching issues...
If the Ravens continued to feed the RBs the ball I think the game would have been decidedly different. Yes our offense was on point this last game but I defense was lucky that the Ravens decided not to feed the running game. When they did they got positive yards at what looked like an average of 4+ yards a carry. BUT to our fortune they got caught up in trying to throw the ball like we do (thanks Cam Cameron) and our pass defense, as bad as it is (but still somehow the strength of our defense), was able to limit their effectiveness for 3.75 quarters. By the way did you see how much time Flacco had back there… just to dump the ball off to a well covered RB?! Ridiculous, we are talking 4 – 5 seconds of no pressure from the front line (albiet Barnes was able to get 4 sacks out of it).
No I don’t think Norv is a Headcoach. He is an Offensive Coordinator who can handle his side of the ball as well as anyone else in the league, but he still needs someone during the game every-now-then to make him re-think his strategy. Plus he does absolutely NOTHING for our defense.
AJ? Might you have seen Quentin Jammer’s play???? Did you see the dropped INT where the ball basically floated in the air begging him to catch it? Or maybe the games before when he just couldn’t stay with certain WRs? Did someone already mention that we are playing 2nd, 3rd, and 4th string SSs who probably would only be on the field as special teamers anywhere else? In my opinion there are only about 6 or 7 (Phillips, Castillo, Weddle, Garay, Barnes, Butler, Spikes?, Liguet?) that worth keeping on that defense and while this league has become a Offensive dominant league you will always need a defense. Personnel Man! Whe need PERSONNEL? AJ – OUT!
As for Norv I think you're on to something...
The Ravens were a bit unlucky, if they got a turn over (like in Mathews fumble) it could have been a different game. When there was only a 10-17 point difference, they could have maybe insisted more on Rice, idk.
As for Norv, maybe they need a better Offensive coordinator, someone to challenge Norv’s play calling when needed and to take care of the things he’s bad at (clock management, a backup/contingency game plan to which they could switch if games get ugly, etc.).
I think change is needed, I just not sold that this offseason is the time to do it. This team is not prepared to make a healthy change. I would rather we get a great OC and groom him to take over Norv. This is what I would want to see from the guy who replaces Norv:
- Being able to run an Air Corryell offense (play calling, preparation and gameplan)
- Reducing penalties (“more discipline”)
- Improving redzone offense (which maybe is only problematic without gates, but still something to improve)
- Being able to change playstyle during the game (and not only half time)
- Fixing our turnover ratio (though, maybe, that is more of a defensive philosophy of contain vs high risk and high reward and having a personal that’s able to bring pressure)
Looking at that I realize that what I want is an improved Norv, not something else entirely. So, that means getting a good OC and teaching him everything Norv knows. Let Norv coach most/all of his extended contract and have his replacement under him ready.
by Lightning Hobo on Dec 20, 2011 5:54 AM PST up reply actions
I'm not sure on AJ
Yeah, he’s had a few bad 1st/2nd round picks, but only because they couldn’t stay healthy, not because of apparent talent on tape (they didn’t play enough on the NFL to tell, mostly). You can sort of understand his reasoning for need and his actual choices are also responsability from the scouting department, which might arguably be the ones who need to go.
AJ ability on getting the UDFA and FA out of the street is impressive, although that’s something hard to compare to other GM’s as those guys are really hard to notice on others teams. It’s been so good in fact that as it was previously mentioned, it might have been a mistake NOT to put our starters on IR sooner.
My take is that I don’t have enough information on how good he really is compared to others, but he has done some maneuvering that is impressive enough to make his ability seems rare and above average. I’m against change for the sake of change. I’m willing to change if it’s an improvement, so get a few candidates and convince me why they are better than AJ (and by the same extent, Norv).
its so easy
its so easy for us as fans to say hey lets fire norv and AJ. but lets hold the phone here lets let this season play out. if we go 7-9 then maybe fire norv and company. but if we go 9-7 and miss the playoffs is it really that bad? marty had 4 losing seasons as our head coach do we not remember those times. To me ive been a diehard for 18 years all ive dreamed of is us being in the big show again. Norv has gotten us closer then weve been since 94 we know he can take us there everything just has to go right. it just hasnt this year shit happens.if we make the playoffs good but i think we need to wait. we fire him then what he comes back with another team and knocks us out of the playoffs. Please everyone martyball is dead get over everything stop being so stubborn!
by Chris Hoke on Dec 20, 2011 6:21 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
I don't think it matters if we keep Norv or not
Much like the Colts, Packers, Saints and Pats this team lives on the play of their QB. If Rivers had even been just decent during the 6 game skid the Chargers would be in a battle for a first round bye right now with no worry at all about making the post season.
If Rivers plays great next year then they are play off bound with Norv or anybody else as Head Coach. If he plays like he did this year then it doesn’t really matter who the coach is they will be lucky if they can sneak their way in.
I am not a big fan of Norv but I don’t see anybody out there that I am convinced will be much of an upgrade. My one hope would be that if either AJ, Norv or both are replaced the Chargers move in a younger direction.
“If Rivers plays great next year then they are play off bound.” Oh, unless the Special Teams is crappy. Oh yeah, and if there are a lot of injuries. Oh yeah, and [insert Norv-centered excuse here].
Will changing head coaches stop these things from happening? Of course not. Not necessarily. But there comes a time — at some point — where things need to be changed. Unfortunately, the head that stands in the way of the guillotine is the one wearing the crown. That’s allz I’m saying. I don’t mean it to be a reflection on Norv as a person; I don’t even mean it to be a reflection on Norv as a coach. But if not now, when? How many more of these seasons do we have to endure? Seriously. Does anyone have a concrete number in their mind. “Okay, next year. That’s it!” How many more years do we have serve as the enabler?
by Andy (allfield) on Dec 20, 2011 1:57 PM PST reply actions
doesn't matter what we say
or how the last 2 games play out.
Norv and AJ will be back next year. Spanos has an excuse (injuries) not to fire them and he will use it.
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
Oh it matters what we say there have been more visiting teams jerseys than home teams, in the last 5 home games..
ticket sales will still be there, sorta’. however, fans of other teams don’t buy Charger jerseys and merchandise..
when money talks, dean spanos listens.
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!
1 stays, 1 goes
Sorry Norv, I just can’t put up with the constant yo-yoing of well prepared games and clueless games. I also don’t think you inspire anyone to play better. But you are a really nice guy.
Anybody that thinks AJ hasn’t placed some of the best talent in the league (with the injury exceptions of 2 recent first round picks) on this team, better depth than almost every other team out there (cause it’s soooo easy to stack talent everyone else can’t see) and an unmatched ability to find guys to fill the incredible number injury holes in the line up, is clearly an idiot imho. It’s pretty easy with 20-20 hindsight to criticize the picks, but at the time the only real reach was English.

by 
































