Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Watch Out For Cowboys UDFA Tim Benford

Debunking Your Ill–Informed Hatred for AJ Smith

It seems AJ Smith garners a lot of hatred by the Chargers fanbase, especially lately. It's a standing joke around here that AJ Smith's ego is out of control, that many of his decisions are done merely to satisfy his ego, the best interests of the team be damned.

Many people have their reasons for disliking AJ Smith, some rooted in truth, others rooted in fantasy land. This started as a direct response to what someone wrote on the Bolts from the Blue Facebook page, and I wanted to expound upon some of the points.

Lest we forget, AJ is the one that built this winning team in the first place.

 

AJ Smith Released the Beloved LaDainian Tomlinson

It's true, the team released LT following the 2009 season. He was (and still is) beloved by Chargers fans everywhere, and it was a bitter pill to swallow for fans of the team, and of LT.

The facts of the matter are that LT wasn't producing at a level the team wanted or needed during the 2009 season. It was time to move on and get a decent running game going. The Chargers were ranked 31st (that's 2nd-to-last) in 2009, and contrary to what LaDainian Tomlinson said in the media, the problems didn't all lie with the offensive line.

There was a running joke amongst several BFTB members that LT could be tripped up by a blade of grass. Even casual fans could notice that he didn't have the explosiveness he used to have, especially when running to the outside. It got to the point where any time he ran to the outside, it almost surely resulted in a loss of yards on the play as LT couldn't outrun linebackers anymore.

Once Tomlinson landed with the Jets (see what I did there?), there was talk about how much better of a Running Back he would be now that he was running behind a dominant offensive line. Granted, his rushing YPC numbers went up (4.2 in 2010 vs 3.3 in 2009), but all other production went down.

Meanwhile, the Chargers run game went from 31st, to 15th. That's quite an improvement after making a change of just one player. So take the emotional attachment out of the situation, and how can you fault AJ for the move?

Star-divide

AJ Smith Never Offered Contracts to Marcus McNeill and Vincent Jackson

Here's the thing: AJ did offer contracts to Marcus McNeill and Vincent Jackson. That's exactly what a Restricted Free Agent Tender is, a one-year contract. that were hefty pay raises for both players. One could argue, AJ didn't have to play hardball with these two players, that he was just exerting his power over them because he could (and his ego was running amok).

I firmly believe though, that AJ had the team's best interest in mind when he set the June 15th deadline to sign the tenders, or face a large cut in pay. AJ told McNeill from the start, "sign the tender, report to camp, and we'll work out a deal." AJ wanted the players to report to the team in time to work out a deal and work with the team as much as possible. It was McNeill's decision to hold out and not report to camp. Once McNeill reported, what happened? Oh yeah, he got a 5-year contract. If AJ truly cared more about exerting control over a player, would he have put his ego aside so readily and offered them a decent contract?

With Vincent Jackson, however, AJ and the team made it clear that Jackson wasn't part of the long-term plans for the team. Whether he's said it publicly or not, it appears AJ Smith sees Wide Receivers as a cheap, and sometimes overrated, commodity (some people here at BFTB believe that to be true to an extent as well).

Vincent Jackson picked the wrong time to make a case for a long-term contract. After all his off-the-field issues (two DUI convictions), his on-the-field antics in the playoff loss to the Jets (honestly, who kicks a challenge flag?), Jackson didn't exactly have much leverage over the team to command a huge contract. The fact he had only been a dominant receiver for what amounts to 1.5 seasons didn't help his value much either. Oh yeah, the CBA changes before the 2010 season didn't help matters.

Like it or not, the Chargers is a business, and AJ is the personnel boss. In business, how often do the employees get to call the shots and how the business is run, instead of the boss? Not very often. AJ didn't want to set a precedence of, "whine and complain enough and you'll get your way." He needed to keep things in order and stick by his guns. If you keep your head down, stay out of the spotlight, and contribute on the field, he'll take care of you.

 

AJ Smith Let Kassim Osgood Go, Resulting in a ST Meltdown

The 7 years Kassim Osgood was on the team, he made it very evident he wanted to be more than a Special Teams player; he wanted to be a true Wide Receiver. He even went on record to say he would be a great receiver some day, "probably not in San Diego." The problem is, he isn't as good a Wide Receiver as he thinks he is, or more accurately, he's just not a very good Wide Receiver.

So to say AJ "let go" of Kassim is a bit disingenuous. Kassim was a free agent, and he made it very known he was unhappy on the Chargers. Jacksonville picked him up quickly, promising he'd be a true WR on the team, in addition to a Special Teams player.

But, Jacksonville subsequently learned he wasn't very good at WR, and used him very little as a WR. The entire 2010 season, he caught 6 passes, SIX, for 60 yards.

Seeing as how Kassim Osgood was never going to be happy in San Diego unless he was a WR, it's kind of hard to fault AJ for not pursuing a contract with him.

 

AJ Smith Let Lorenzo Neal Go, Dooming the Running Game

Lorenzo Neal was great when he was with the Chargers, no doubt about that. However, AJ knew he was becoming less effective and nearing retirement: he had been in the league for 15 seasons at that point and only started 8 games in 2007. The writing was on the wall that the Chargers needed the roster space, so the team waived him.

Baltimore picked him up, and again, he was not the usual starter (started only 5 games) and was used only on occasion. Come 2009, he never made it out of training camp.

 

AJ Smith Fired Marty Schottenheimer After a 14-2 Season Because They Didn't Get Along

This one still cracks me up. Either people like to rewrite history, or they weren't paying much attention at the time.

The fact is, Dean Spanos had stated the team would keep Marty for another year, even though there was the strained relationship between AJ and Marty. When four members of Marty's coaching staff all left the team for higher positions, it made Marty a bit more expendable as there was already going to be a wholesale change in the coaching staff.

Things boiled over when Marty insisted that his brother Kurt become the Chargers new Defensive coordinator, going against Dean Spanos' wishes. It was Dean Spanos who ultimately fired Marty because even he and Marty now had a dysfunctional relationship.

 

AJ Smith Traded Drew Brees Away

This has already been covered before.

 

No one thinks AJ is perfect. He's made some spectacular trades and drafts, and also some less-than-impressive moves over the years. He's the most public head of the franchise, so of course he's going to get his fair share of flack. So long as that flack is well-informed and rooted in truth, well, then it's deserved.

Comment 41 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Still concerned

Many of those moves don’t bother me. What does bother me are:

1. crummy drafts which includes many guys who haven’t panned out or paying too much to trade up for marginal players

2. replacing Marty (ok the guy panicked when it counted and his players played stupid) w/ Norv and Ted Cottrell. Is AJ playing money ball and saying that coaches don’t matter? What’s even scarier is knowing that the guy AJ wanted as head coach was Wade Phillips.

by The Gorn on Jan 27, 2011 1:50 PM PST reply actions  

2. replacing Marty (ok the guy panicked when it counted and his players played stupid) w/ Norv and Ted Cottrell.

Did you not read the part of the post that explained why Marty was fired?

1. crummy drafts which includes many guys who haven’t panned out or paying too much to trade up for marginal players

We’ve been over this. They’re not as bad as you think, you’re just looking at it in a vacuum. AJ tends to get 2-3 starting-quality players out of each draft, which is above average for the league.

Bolts from the Blue - Destroying your opinions with facts.

by John Gennaro on Jan 27, 2011 2:07 PM PST up reply actions  

re: Cottrell

We all know how terrible he was in 2008, but in 2007 it was the defense that got us to the AFC Championship game. He had that bend, don’t break D working like a well-oiled machine. Hell, they gave us a chance to beat the Pats. He probably deserved to be fired in ‘08, but let’s not forget what he did the 2nd half of 2007 (and that wasn’t all Cromartie turning into a freak).

by Cake or Death on Jan 27, 2011 8:26 PM PST up reply actions  

I have no issue w/ AJ canning Marty. I have a serious issue w/ who he hired and who he really wanted (Wade Phillips).

2-3 starting quality players from the draft? If you count his success w/ UFDAs, maybe. His ability to draft first and second rounders seems suspect lately. He’s much better at finding gems in the late rounds and the UFDA pool. So as a result, our team’s decline has much to do with AJ’s inability to replace star talent w/ similar talent. This is something New England and Pittsburgh have been able to do.

by The Gorn on Jan 27, 2011 2:42 PM PST reply actions  

He actually hasn’t done too badly over the last few drafts in the first couple rounds.

Here are all AJ’s drafts

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Jan 27, 2011 2:58 PM PST up reply actions  

The Marcus McNeill situation was a mistake by AJ

I don’t see why the long term contract that MM ended up signing wasn’t offered over the summer. Seems like MM would have been signed if it had been offered and been in camp from day 1. I’m not sure what AJ’s motivation was to try and force MM through the same process as VJ, but it ended up looking bad.

Why make him sign the tender? Why not just offer the multi-year contract? Sure, we don’t know that MM would have signed it over the summer, we don’t even know that it wasn’t offered, but we also don’t know how much of an assurance AJ gave to MM about a new contract if he signed the tender.

Otherwise, I think AJ has made very few mis-steps. The only other big one I can think of was keeping LT over Michael Turner, and at the time there was really no other option.

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Jan 27, 2011 2:54 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I think keeping LT over Turner was a PR move. We knew we couldn’t afford both (but should have tried anyway), and LT just had the most amazing couple season on two legs. The people would have frowned a giant frown had we gotten rid of LT.

but in that pats game… we really should’ve run the ball more. Turner was hot and PR17 was on his last leg, fo’ realz.

"Watch out where the huskies go, don't you eat that yellow snow."- Zappa

by QuesaDiaz on Jan 27, 2011 3:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Keeping both was not an option

LT was playing out his 8 year, $60 mil with $21 mil guaranteed contract.

Turner signed a 6 year, $34.5 mil with $15 mil guaranteed contract after the 2007 season.

Way, way, way too much money to commit to the same backfield. Plus Turner wanted to be a starter.

by 'Eaters on Jan 27, 2011 3:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not sure the complete rationale behind making him sign the tender

The only thing that I can think of is him using it as leverage, a test if you will, to say to Marcus, “show that you’re a team player. Sign the tender, report to camp, and we’ll take good care of you.”

And Marcus took that as an insult.

by creanium on Jan 27, 2011 9:27 PM PST up reply actions  

rec

Like u said many of these points have been covered but not all in one place. This should be a nice post to link to for some of the trolls that come through.

I don’t think AJ is really off the hook either for many of the things that have gone wrong lately, but I think he is poised to make some big steps towards regaining the AFC West crown with this upcoming offseason.

by jkvandal on Jan 27, 2011 3:27 PM PST reply actions  

Agreed.

This wasn’t meant to be an “AJ can do no wrong” post, it merely was meant to serve as a post to debunk some of the misinformed negative opinions that are out there.

by creanium on Jan 27, 2011 3:39 PM PST up reply actions  

all he has done

is put a consistent contender on the field, year in and year out. what more can you want from the guy?

"i'm not inclined to resign to maturity"...PSYCH theme

by $#%@ eli and his daddy on Jan 27, 2011 4:21 PM PST reply actions  

I have the solution...

AJ should pick the for the last 4 rounds of the draft and UDFA’s and someone else pick in the first 3 rounds. Any suggestions on who should pick them?

BOOM!

by whatsapip on Jan 27, 2011 6:46 PM PST reply actions  

I second that

….anyone except for Bobby, maybe we can rent out Ozzie Newsome for the weekend

by bo_shilo on Jan 27, 2011 8:52 PM PST up reply actions  

AJ's picks in the first three rounds since taking over

2004 – Rivers, Olshanski, kaeding, Hartwick
2005 – Merriman, Castillo, VJ
2006 – Cromartie, McNeill, Whitehurst
2007 – Buster, Weddle
2008 – Cason, Hester
2009 – English, Vasquez
2010 – Mathews, Butler

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Jan 28, 2011 8:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Decent names, but...

… couldn’t you say the same for any team’s first three rounds over the same period? And what’s with only two picks in the first three rounds the last 4 years? That’s downright Beathard-esque.

As a GM, AJ is very “corporate.” That’s fine. I have no problem with that. I think he does an above average job of touting the company line of fiscal restraint while still managing to maintain a high-quality level of personnel.

But Beathard stripped away several layers of skin when it came to his idiotic drafts, and those wounds are fresh and the nerves around them are raw. I am personally unforgiving of draft day mistakes. I need instant gratification. I don’t want to evaluate drafts 3 years later. Jermaine Fazande was a bust from day 1! Michael Ricks? Bryan Still?? Names that to this day, still induce a nervous twitch.

AJ could cement his legacy in my eyes by improving his drafts. Now excuse me while I crawl back into my padded room…

by Andy (allfield) on Jan 30, 2011 10:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Another idea...

Keep AJ out of the state of Louisiana!!!! Back to back busts!

by Wookalar on Jan 27, 2011 9:41 PM PST reply actions  

Osgood

Bear in mind also with regards to Osgood that we offered a contract but he took less from the Jags in order to get a shot at WR. Can’t really fault either KO or the Chargers in that case

by ramezes on Jan 28, 2011 5:34 AM PST reply actions  

?

1-The running game improved because of O-line health, and Jacob Hester’s improvement as well as Running back health. LT was hurt half the year, and ran behind a decimated line.
2- McNiell and Jackson are idiots for not signing their tenders.
3- Osgood was always doubled as a gunner, which probably affected the punt protection. If the gunners were one on one, that left more guys to attack for the block. And CJ Spillman was terrible in kick coverage. Nowhere remotely close to KO.
Everything else is great.

Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say, 'Golly gee, I can't do that."

by Superduperboltman on Jan 28, 2011 6:45 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

  1. I’ll give you the O-Line health improvement. And I admit I should have focused more on pointing out LT’s health and durability being factors as well. Just look at how limited he became in later games with the Jets.
  2. Thank you. I’m in agreement with that, but I didn’t want to come out and say it quite like that. I still gave them the benefits of the doubt.
  3. Yep. The overall collapse of the Special Teams could be placed on AJ Smith for lack of personnel, however, I merely was addressing the issue that “AJ let KO leave.” The fact of the matter was KO didn’t want to stay with the Chargers if he wasn’t going to be a WR, and the Chargers weren’t about to use him as a WR anymore.

by creanium on Jan 28, 2011 10:15 AM PST up reply actions  

NO ONE has been more critical of A.J. than me…
However..
your article really explains a lot of misconseptions I’ve had for a long time…
O.K. A.J….CLEAN slate!
(just get Norv to WIN games in September and all is good)

by BOLTS fan forever on Jan 28, 2011 8:12 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Oh…and WINNING in January wouldn’t be bad either!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by BOLTS fan forever on Jan 28, 2011 8:16 AM PST reply actions  

Rec!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say, 'Golly gee, I can't do that."

by Superduperboltman on Jan 28, 2011 11:57 AM PST up reply actions  

A couple items of disagreement

I have issues with some of your analysis in this article. You have a very simplistic view towards the events you discuss…most of which fail to mention key facts that lead to the fan’s perspective that A.J. does indeed allow his ego to affect the performance of his position as GM.

A great example of this are your comments involving the contracts of Vincent Jackson and Marcus McNeil. Yes, A.J. did offer them RFA tenders. But if A.J. was doing, as you say, what is best for the franchise and in the best interest of getting them in camp to work with the team, then how does in setting a pay-cut deadline accomplish that? Those tactics are debatable though, I’ll give you that. What isn’t debatable is this: If A.J.’s actions are in the best interest of the team, how does placing the players on the roster-exempt list serve the best interest of the team? The New England Patriots had a nearly identical situation this season with Logan Mankins. Did they place him on the roster exempt list and make him unavailable for three games after he signed? No. They did what was best for their team and what would get their player back with the team as soon as possible. Why didn’t A.J. do that? His actions did NOT get his players back as soon as possible. That behavior was totally unnecessary. Who knows what his motivation was for doing that to his team and these players, but I know for sure that what he did was not the best he could do for the team.

I noticed you mentioned in the comments section that A.J. gets "2-3 starting-quality players out of every draft". I wish that were true. Here’s how many starting-quality players we’ve grabbed in the draft recently: 2010 – (1)* Ryan Mathews. I use an asterisk here because he still has to prove that he can stay healthy and know enough of the playbook to actually BE a starter. It is already rumored that he and Tolbert will split carries in 2011. Really, no Chargers player drafted in 2010 is a starter-caliber player yet. 2009 – (1) Louis Vasquez. 2008 – (1) Antoine Cason. Honorable Mention goes to Jacob Hester, although he’s not on the field all that much. But I guess that qualifies this draft as grabbing 2 starters. 2007 – (1) Eric Weddle. Naanee almost qualifies here, but he is a #3 or #4 WR on the roster. 2006 – (2) Marcus McNeill and Antonio Cromartie. Cromartie is obviously no longer on the team though. In the end, that’s a total of 7 players.

So, in FIVE drafts, only SEVEN players (at most) are starter-quality players (and one isn’t with the team anymore), out of a TOTAL of 34 draftees. So with Cromartie’s departure, we have 6 players out 34 that are starter-quality. 6 players out of FIVE drafts. If you break it down more, Mathews is still working to get to starter-quality, and Hester is a fullback who’s not on the field all that much. So the six players are basically starters…ok. None of them are stars, studs, or even game-changers.

Some of our draftees that aren’t starting-quality are playing special teams. OK. I suppose that’s fine. I think it should be mentioned that a fair amount of our picks in the past five years have been in the later rounds. And to a degree, that can explain why so many of our draftees are only special teamers or aren’t even in football anymore. But a big reason why we have the later-round picks is because we traded away our higher round picks to move up to get players like Weddle, Hester, and Mathews. The Weddle and Hester pick swaps were a lot to give up. Especially with Hester and especially since neither are game-changing players, stars, or even impact players. My point is that A.J. has got to do a MUCH better job in the draft. Plain and simple. And saying he’s getting 2-3 starters per draft just isn’t true.

by ncdthree on Jan 28, 2011 10:16 AM PST reply actions  

One issue with what you say

If Jackson wasn’t on the roster exempt list, he wouldn’t have signed when he did. His intent was to play the absolute minimum necessary to accumulate a year of service time. Because he was on the RE list, he had to sign prior to Week 8. If he hadn’t been placed on that list, he would have signed after the Week 10 game and still played in only 6 games.

by Zach (maestro876) on Jan 28, 2011 10:37 AM PST up reply actions  

clarification

(I feel that the term “starter-quality” refers to full-time starters. So when I use it, that’s what I mean.)

by ncdthree on Jan 28, 2011 12:15 PM PST up reply actions  

I sort of agree

about the drafts, but if Creanium skews his evidence too far one way, you go too far the other, the rule of thumb is not to judge a draft for three years. Not all players adjust to the game in their rookie season so writing off Butler, Cam Thomas and Stuckey as non-starters seems extremely premature. Also it’s fair enough to note that Cromartie is gone, but we have a second rounder coming up that may well turn into a starter. Siler could be a starter next year too. Using your method we would have written off VJ as a non-starter. All that said, I agree with the fundamental point that AJ needs to do better in the draft if the Chargers are going to get to the promised land.

The play of chance and probability within which the creative spirit is free to roam. -von Clausewitz 'On Football'

by Brian (DaBolts) on Jan 28, 2011 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

For the record

I never discussed AJ’s draft picks, that was our fearless leader who brought up the “2-3 starters”.

by creanium on Jan 28, 2011 3:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Whoops

Sorry about that…

The play of chance and probability within which the creative spirit is free to roam. -von Clausewitz 'On Football'

by Brian (DaBolts) on Jan 28, 2011 3:34 PM PST up reply actions  

nice picture of AJ

I guess ivory now comes in blue and granite

Bring back Balboa Stadium.

by calipatrick on Jan 29, 2011 7:11 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


BFTB Apparel Store

Bftbshirtstore_medium

Facebook

Chargers on Twitter


Managers

Paddlin_small John Gennaro

Assistant Editors

Dont-panic-thumb_small Wonko

Pomeranian_of_war_small Richard Wade

Antonio_small creanium

Columnists

Sdclogo2_small Orz

Tn_small Jeff (sliderockmpc)

Wrong_small_small Superduperboltman

Screen_shot_2011-08-05_at_2 jkvandal