(Not so) Special Teams...What Gives?
So by now everyone has noticed one of the glaring weaknesses in the 2010 Chargers through 3 games: Special Teams. Many ideas are being thrown around to solve the problem, some realistic, some not: they include "trade VJ to get KO back" and "Fire the ST Coach." Those are both pretty extreme, and I'm not sure either would solve the immediate issues on the ST unit.
After the jump I will delve into the reasons that we are seeing such a poor showing from a unit that has historically been one of the strengths of the team wearing lightning bolts.
Missing players:
Two key players on ST's have left since last season: Kassim Osgood and Tim Dobbins. Both of these guys were monsters on special teams for several seasons and their absences left two spots that needed to be filled, but that isn't the only reason we have new players on ST's. I'm also not sure of this one but I believe Brandon Manumaleuna was on Special Teams as well in his time in San Diego, which makes yet another key player to replace.
New Faces:
With the youth movement all across the team at various positions, players who had previously been standouts on special teams find themselves as starters and getting less playing time on kick returns and coverage. For example, Antoine Cason finds himself as a starting CB and Brandon Siler as a starting ILB. That is two more players taken off of Special Teams to add to the 2 above, making 4 (and possibly 5) new faces on the Special Teams unit at the start of the season.
Injuries:
With the injury to Ryan Mathews, Mike Tolbert was the starting RB yesterday, and while he was still out there on a couple ST snaps, he and Jacob Hester (both ST standouts last season) found themselves in starting roles yesterday. With the injury to Stephen Cooper, Siler steps into his starting spot, taking him off of Special Teams. With the injury to Larry English and Shawne Merriman, Antwan Applewhite had to fill in at OLB yesterday, taking his focus away from ST's. Also, Jyles Tucker was inactive yesterday for personal reasons, making him unable to contribute.
So why did we suck yesterday?
Players were unsure of their responsibilities:
- With several players thrust into ST's roles due to injuries and inactives yesterday, we had players that weren't quite sure of their lane responsibilities on coverage, and they found themselves out of place leaving large running lanes for Leon Washington.
- Part one of making a tackle is getting in the right position to do so.
Part two of tackling: Making the tackle.
- This is particularly the case on the second return, since the first TD return he had such a huge running lane he didn't have to shed many tackles. Our guys found themselves trying to arm tackle Washington and that's just not reliable at this level.
- Obviously we can't count on the kicker to make the tackle, although he could have had better attempts.
The wrong type of players were on the field:
- On kickoff coverage you need guys who are not only fast, but big to bust through blocks. The majority of players on ST's come from your LB's and DB's because they are used to shedding blocks and tackling. Yesterday, because of the loss of depth at LB, Darrell Stuckey was running down the field and his job was to bust the two-person wedge? That's not going to work. Stuckey ended up trying to run around the wedge since he couldn't bust through it, and that contributed to the large running lane for Leon Washington on his first TD return. The coaching staff recognized this and the next return Kris Wilson was running down the field to bust the wedge, he just didn't do much better.
- In short, when you find yourself with a lack of big bodies on kick coverage, you are going to have a problem.
So how do we stop sucking?
- Practice tackling.
- Get our LB depth healthy.
- Get the right personnel out there on ST's (see above comment).
- Learn gap responsibilities.
I think we have the time to address the areas above, and I think we will begin to see the ST's improve from week to week, the question is if they will improve fast enough to allow the Bolts to start winning some games and not have to come from behind in every game.
This FanPost was written by a member of the Bolts From The Blue community and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bolts From The Blue editors or SB Nation.
44 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good Breakdown.
But BMaul wasn’t a ST standout. He was just a 4 foot wide barrier. Did I just contradict myself? Maybe. But KO out on coverage was like having 12 guys. Or the other team having 10. Or some other mathematical inequality.
Need a hand? Call for help! Superduperboltman is here!
by Superduperboltman on Sep 27, 2010 5:21 PM PDT reply actions
I agree
KO was also usually down the field much earlier than anyone has been in the past few games. You don’t have to make a tackle if you are there before the ball is.
6/10/2010 - Tra Thomas signs with the Chargers
8/21/2010 - Tra Thomas retires.
That was fast.
KO was a special teams beast
part of that is athletic ability and part of that is awareness…how many years did KO play special teams? I want to say 6 or 7. The awareness is something that takes time and experience, we just have to hope the coaches find a solution for the current breakdowns.
Yeah I don't think that I said Malumaleuna was a standout
and he probably contributed more on returns than coverages, but that’s still another guy to replace on ST’s.
Vaughn Martin?
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Sep 28, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm sure I will be lambasted
But if our STs does not start improving quickly. I believe we will need to have starters out there and risk their injury.
by zelkolnikov on Sep 27, 2010 5:46 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Nah
we’d just start kicking it out of bounds if our kick coverage becomes that much of a liability. The penalty for doing that would be a lot less costly then potentially losing one of our starters.
Please don't read my signature.
by SoCalBoltFan on Sep 27, 2010 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions
I do believe Norv was quoted
Saying some starters will have to play special teams.
by Its Mikey!! on Sep 28, 2010 12:28 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I say
Fire the ST coach…he obviously didn’t change anything from the chiefs game. Also osgood was a monster out there on punts and kickoff coverage
by NorthCountyBolt on Sep 27, 2010 5:47 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Or the whole ST’s staff if we have to
by NorthCountyBolt on Sep 27, 2010 5:51 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Or Fire Norv. Or switch to the 4-3.
I’m telling you our STs would not be this bad if we never let Drew Brees go!
Please don't read my signature.
by SoCalBoltFan on Sep 27, 2010 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Cough Cough...
if we never traded Drew Brees
by riversformvp on Sep 27, 2010 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
If we just gave VJ that contract extension.
ST would be back to their dominant ways.
by Its Mikey!! on Sep 28, 2010 1:02 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Fire Norv? 4-3? Brees? if?
seriously.
Need a hand? Call for help! Superduperboltman is here!
by Superduperboltman on Sep 27, 2010 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions
IMO
It’s too early too call for STs coach’s head. He needs more than 3 weeks to figure out what needs to be changed.
Please don't read my signature.
by SoCalBoltFan on Sep 27, 2010 5:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Im
Just saying they need to do whatever they have to do to make plays and not give the game away. Maybe we really should start kicking it out of bounds…
by NorthCountyBolt on Sep 27, 2010 6:05 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Or go for the onside kick every time
At least we risk bad field position while also giving ourselves the chance of getting the ball as well…haha. I felt the same way during/after the game but I don’t think we’re going to be intentionally kicking the ball out of bounds any time soon.
Squib kick?
you have had 2 returned on you already (once in KC and once to open the half) (we could add KC’s punt return too) why not just squibb kick it? Or pop it up really high on the kick so that the defense can run under it. I would give them the 30/35 yard line to start any day of the week during that game. Just don’t let them return it again, make them earn the score.
Do whatever we did last year after the donkeys ran 2 kicks back for TDs
Our special teams coverage teams didn’t start off that great last year either.
I don’t thik it was this bad, but Eddie Royal killing us with two kick returns for TDs.
Of course Sproles ran a punt back for a TD as well, so we were only -7.
That wasn't the coverage unit's fault
Scifres had a bad groin and didn’t get the air under the ball that he usually gets, so the ball didn’t go as far as the coverage unit. The kickoff TD was just a mess.
Need a hand? Call for help! Superduperboltman is here!
by Superduperboltman on Sep 28, 2010 6:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Great post vandal
I know our STs units suck as a whole, but when are people going to start throwing Kadeing under the bus? I mean the guy SUCKS on kickoffs. If we never get touchbacks, then it’s pretty obvious we will have more huge returns against us.
IMO
Yeah
I feel like I remember Scifres kicking farther on kickoffs, but maybe they’re taking it easy on his groin.
Its not time yet
when are people going to start throwing Kadeing under the bus?
We have to hold our Kaeding diatribe until the next Jets game…
Seriously though they should have open tryouts to see which of the 53 players can kick the farthest off the 1" tee. Who knows? Maybe Dombrosky can be our kick off specialist too? He does everything else they ask.
by Trendsearcher on Sep 28, 2010 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Hahaha. Kicker.

An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Sep 28, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions
I was at the game surrounded by hawk fans
And it was embarrassing!!!! I was hoping for my first live game to be much better….it was supposed to be an easy win, just like the jags game…a good team pounding a bad team. Our offense worked hard to tie the game just for the ST to give up another TD in less than 15 seconds!!!! Oh well….all we can do is dust our shoulders off and continue to work hard on fixing our weak spots….
by Northwestbolt on Sep 28, 2010 12:09 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
one other thing
stop letting pro-bowl players on ST walk. out. the. door…
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!
He ran out the door
To try to become a WR. In which he’d never see the field for here.
by Its Mikey!! on Sep 28, 2010 12:59 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
and his replacements have done a great job
that’s because they wanted to replace him with rookie that’s spent 4 years on the trainer table.
they never offered him a deal. they let him walk.
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!
a deal would have been pointless
Like mikey said, he wanted to get a chance to be a WR in the league. Norv was honest and told him that he didn’t see him beating out any of the WR’s ahead of him here in SD, and he was right. Would you rather have had the head coach lie to the player only to have a disgruntled player on the roster?
The team did what was right, the player did what was right (for him), and it’s no one’s fault that KO left. It’s part of the game: players come and go. Now the coaches have to find (and train) a replacement for a great special teams player, something that takes time.
Let's bring back Wilhelm and Hart...
Last joke I’ll make, I promise…
by Its Mikey!! on Sep 28, 2010 1:00 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
how about dobbins?
was he a joke?
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!
Special Teams
I believe we should trade VJ for a ST coach
Yeah, and while we're at it
let’s just have Rivers kick the ball off. He’s gotta be better than Nate, and from preseason we know he can tackle…problem solved.
I'm sure Jacksonville would trade VJ for KO
by riversformvp on Sep 28, 2010 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Heyyy... how's KO's contract structured?
Did he get a lot of up-front cash? I doubt it, but if so, VJ for KO and a 2nd is probably a pretty likely thing.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Sep 28, 2010 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions
How hard would be to sign a kickoff specialist
Who just boots it out of the back of the endzone every time? Seriously, is this something the team cannot afford, or is this person too difficult to find. Or do they just not want to use the roster spot?
Its been mentioned before.
It takes up a roster spot, and the only kicker who’s been able to kick it that hard only does it 1/3 of the time, and he’s in Dallas. The better solution would be to cover the effin kickoffs.
Need a hand? Call for help! Superduperboltman is here!
by Superduperboltman on Sep 28, 2010 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions
We just need a guy who can get some lift.
It’s okay if it falls short of the end-zone… [i]after[/i] our guys have a chance to get to it and stop the return.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Sep 28, 2010 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Can't get much lift off the 1' tee
That’s why they took away the 3" tee.
by Trendsearcher on Sep 28, 2010 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions

by 

































