Chargers Season Preview: How Many Wins?
I'm actually surprised that nobody has yet taken it upon themselves to go through the San Diego Chargers' 2010 regular season schedule and predict wins and losses. I guess that leaves it up to me.
Week 1
at Kansas City (Monday Night)
I have to be honest here, although I know that eventually some Chiefs fan is going to grab a hold on this statement and try and throw it back into my face. I don't think the Chiefs are a good team. I think they're a mediocre team with a very good running back. I think they're the Tennessee Titans of 2009, and I think Matt Cassell is more Kerry Collins than he is Vince Young. Even if he's Vince Young, that's still not the greatest thing in the world.
In two games against the Chiefs last year, the Chargers won by 30 points and 29 points. Assuming all the talk about the Chiefs getting better this year is true, I could see those margins shrinking....but not by that much.
Win (1-0)
Week 2
Jacksonville
The Jaguars are one of the weirder teams in the league. David Garrard looked like he was the next Donovan McNabb in 2006 and 2007, before looking pretty terrible for the last two seasons. Similar to Matt Cassel, I have always taken issue with Garrard's penchant for holding onto the ball too long and taking negative plays. I'm a little surprised that this team went 7-9 last year in such a tough division, because I thought they were much worse than that. Their young offensive line will be a year older, and their running game could be a problem for the Chargers. This just feels like one of those early-season "wake up" games for the Bolts.
Loss (1-1)
Week 3
at Seattle
Say what you want about the state of the Seahawks, Pete Carroll has completely revamped that roster and there is real excitement surrounding the team. Playing in Seattle is always challenging too, as they have one of the loudest fanbases/stadiums in the league. Don't sleep on Seattle, if Matt Hasselbeck is healthy and Lawyer Milloy(!) doesn't kill them as the Strong Safety they will have a good shot at winning the division. This team has talent. This will be a tough/close game.
Win (2-1)
Week 4
Arizona
I feel like I just took a deep breath. After facing an above-average power-running game (yikes!) and a Pro Bowl QB, the Cardinals should seem like a fairly easy matchup. If Matt Leinart was the starter and had a good preseason, that'd be one thing, but this looks like it's going to be a down year in Arizona with Derek Anderson manning the QB position.
Win (3-1)
Week 5
at Oakland
It seems like every offseason the Raiders are the team that I have the most trouble figuring out. This offseason, people are constantly asking me "Are the Raiders going to be good this year?" and my answer is usually something like "Well they have a good defense, a good running attack, a good coach and what seems like a good QB. Then again, they are the Raiders. So....maybe?" This team could win 10 games this season and not surprise me. They could also win 3 and not surprise me. Even if it's the former, and they turn out to be a good team this year, I really can't imagine either game being anything but a close matchup that ends with a Philip Rivers 2-minute drill for the game-winning score.
Win (4-1)
Week 6
at St. Louis (10am PDT)
Things I hate:
- Early start times.
- Back-to-back road games.
- Games in domes, on turf.
- Stephen Jackson vs. the Chargers' run defense.
Win (5-1)
Week 7
New England
I'm really happy that this is a home game. Outside of that, this game scares me. For the first time in a long time, people aren't talking about the Patriots as Super Bowl contenders. Not as much as usual, anyways, and if they love anything it's being an underdog. Add that to the fact that Tom Brady looked better in the second half of last season than the first, and you could see how this could be a tough team to handle. It's too bad we can't convince the Patriots to trade for Matt Cassel for this game, cause it was a lot of fun last time....
via kissingsuzykolber.uproxx.com
Loss (5-2)
Week 8
Tennessee
Things I like:
- Back-to-back home games.
- Going up against Vince Young (3 career games vs. SD, QB rating of 39.4) or Kerry Collins (7 career games vs. SD, QB rating of 64.7).
- Legedu Naanee vs. a rookie 6th round draft pick.
Win (6-2)
Week 9
at Houston (10am PST)
Let's talk about time for a second. It's a well-known fact that west-coast teams typically don't do so well when they have to travel to the east coast and play 3 hours earlier than normal. The players' internal clocks play some role in all of this and make them not as comfortable. The Chargers' seemed fine against the Giants last year in their only Eastern Time Zone game, but this one is another test. I guess it's just dumb luck then that this game is being played on the day when everyone's clocks are set back one hour.
As far as the football is concerned, who knows? I tell everyone who tells me how good the Texans' offense is that Matt Schaub has always been this good, he's just never been able to stay healthy for an entire season like he did in 2009. If he can do it again in 2010, this will most likely turn into an offensive shootout that can go either way depending on Pass Intereference calls, dropped passes, Holding penalties, etc. etc. If he can't stay healthy, this is an easy Chargers win.
Win (7-2)
Week 10
Bye
Win (No arrests)
Week 11
Denver (Monday Night)
Pretty late to start playing the Broncos, wouldn't you say? I still think this is a team on the rise, but this late in the season I think their old defense will start having some issues.
Win (8-2)
Week 12
at Indianapolis (5:20pm PST)
I'm not a believer in the "We have Peyton Manning's number!" sentiment that floats around San Diego. Call me a coward, but that's still one of the 3 best QBs to ever play the position. The Patriots thought that had his number for a long time, and look at what he's done to them in the last few seasons.
Loss (8-3)
Week 13
Oakland
I hate the weeks when the Raiders come to town. The whole city downgrades. Again, by this time in the season this could be a matchup to determine the AFC West champ or it could be the Raiders having nothing to lose and trying to injury Chargers players.
Win (9-3)
Week 14
Kansas City
Please no Brodie Croyle. That guy might actually beat us. By the way, in response to my statement about owning/not owning Peyton Manning....when does the "Matt Cassel can't beat the Chargers" talk begin? 3 games, 3 losses by about 4 touchdowns. His QB rating against San Diego is a delightfully low 49.4 and the only team that has sacked him as much as the Chargers (10 times) have is the Steelers (10 in 2 games). Until Matty can have a good game against the Bolts, I will continue to believe that it's not possible.
Win (10-3)
Week 15
San Francisco (Thursday Night)
A short week (boo) isn't that bad when it's your third home game in a row (yay!). Still, this is one of those games where the Chargers could be caught napping. Also, the 2010 49ers remind me an awful lot of the 2009 Jets. Strong defense, strong o-line, strong running game and a pesky QB that can do just enough to beat you if the team is disciplined. I think this team is going to be scary-good.
Loss (10-4)......WAIT A SECOND! (checks schedule) December 16th?!? Well, who am I to go against history and the gods?
Win (11-3)
Week 16
at Cincinnati (5:20pm PST)
The best thing about a short week is that it's followed by a long one. I wasn't a big believer in the Bengals last season and, with Cedric Benson being run into the ground and the team signing Terrell Owens (and desperately trying to work him into the offense), I don't see that changing in 2010. I tend to think their record in '09 was a bit of a fluke, and I think they'll come back to earth and be a .500 team this season.
Win (12-3)
"Charlie, get loose. And grow your beard back, for Christ sake....you look like a 12 year old boy."
Meaningless Loss (12-4)
54 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'll go 13-3
New England, Houston, and Week 17 Denver losses. I really hope I’m right.
http://twitter.com/matthewverygood
http://lobsterstuffedwithtacos.tumblr.com
by matthewverygood on Sep 2, 2010 10:20 AM PDT reply actions
10-6 or 11-5.
I’ve said this a bunch of times, so I’ll just say it again to be repetitive. They were really unlucky in 2008, and really lucky in 2009. Things balance out, and they win 10 or 11 games. Good enough for the division title, but probably not good enough for a bye week.
If you pinned me down for game-by-game details, I’d say losses against Indianapolis, Houston, Jacksonville, some NFC West team, and one or two AFC West teams.
by Zach (maestro876) on Sep 2, 2010 10:26 AM PDT reply actions
No matter what happens
I expect it to be as John described. If Schaub isn’t healthy, we’ll win by a ton. If he is, it’ll be some 48-45 shootout.
by Zach (maestro876) on Sep 2, 2010 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions
2006 Cincinnati game
That was a fun one.
by Lenny Suckerpunch on Sep 2, 2010 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions
Something like that.
Though I don’t expect us to fall behind so quickly like in that one.
by Zach (maestro876) on Sep 2, 2010 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions
http://www.hulu.com/watch/124340/game-of-the-week-2006-chargers--bengals
"i'm not inclined to resign to maturity"...PSYCH theme
by $#%@ eli and his daddy on Sep 2, 2010 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm just saying, they need to win that game
Get my wedding day started off on the right foot
"Don’t get nervous. Norv is in charge."
Hahahahaha.
Good luck trying to watch football that day.
by Zach (maestro876) on Sep 2, 2010 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't need to be at the venue until 1:30
So I’m golden. =)
"Don’t get nervous. Norv is in charge."
12-4 or 13-3
shouldn’t be a problem…on a side note, gorditoe started a fantasy league and we’re still needing teams to fill it…do it
"that wasn't a very good start to us getting our lives together. i didn't even go to work today."
...ya'll are brutalizing me... ronnie dobbs
i go ham
I think the Raiders are going to win one against us
Not sure which one, but I expect Oakland to win one of those two games this year. They really should have beaten us last year, but Russell bailed us out.
They’re defense is underrated and they should have a decent record this year, as long as their QB doesn’t screw the pooch.
Worst case scenario, I think the Bolts will win AT LEAST 10 games.
Raiders defense is so underrated its actually overrated now
Sorry, we beat them twice.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
by Wonko on Sep 2, 2010 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
The Raiders can't stop the run.
The only reason they could play us last year was that we couldn’t run. They’re doomed.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen;
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Sep 2, 2010 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Good Write-Up
Even if it’s a bit rosey. Could play out just as you say. Our running game can’t be worse than it was last year, but we’ve yet to establish anything this year: Mathews showed promise in the pre-season, but the o-line was inconsistent, and it’s hard to judge the opponents’ D’s…. Mathews is better than LT (at this point), but minus McNeil it’s the same O-line as last year, and Sproles wasn’t any good in the running game last year either. Again, we’ll be better with the run than last year, but HOW much better is a huge question…. (And I’d love to see a huge improvement, but even a minor one could make a significant impact….)
Raiders will be better overall than last year, especially in the passing game (obviously) and could beat us for sure (but only once, of course). Chargers’ defense is too inconsistent to be counted upon, and the passing offense is potentially great, but also suffers from too many miscues…. Hopefully the miscues aren’t turnovers.
By virtue of a relatively easy schedule and an improving but still sub-par division, I’d say we go 11-5 or 10-6, (probably) win the division, and win the first playoff game…. Going further than that will depend on way too many things not known at this point, not only with respect to the Chargers’ “game,” but everyone else’s, too, and of course injuries….
I’d love to drink some of the Kool-Aid they’re passing out below, but until I do, I’m guardedly optimistic…. Nonetheless — and of course: GO BOLTS!
19-0
NOT JUST THIS YEAR, BUT EVERY YEAR TILL THE MIGHTY PR17 RETIRES!
ANYBODY WANT SOME OF THAT KOOL-AID?
"i'm not inclined to resign to maturity"...PSYCH theme
by $#%@ eli and his daddy on Sep 2, 2010 11:15 AM PDT reply actions
Sure, I'll take a jug
Oh yeah!
http://twitter.com/matthewverygood
http://lobsterstuffedwithtacos.tumblr.com
by matthewverygood on Sep 2, 2010 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Oakland?
The only reason we didn’t lose one to Oakland last year was because of Jamarcus. Gradkowski was good enough to give us a run for our money.
Losses: Oakland, Denver, Indianapolis, Jacksonville
(11-5) Anything less and we don’t live up to our potential.
I only missed by one game last year
with my prediction article. Predicted 14-2, record was 13-3
Think you’ll match that? :-)
FWIW – I think you’re within a game at 12-4. And I think we lose one to Oakland.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
FWIW?
Bolts from the Blue - Destroying your opinions with facts.
by John Gennaro on Sep 2, 2010 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions
For what it's worth
In other words, my 2 cents.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
by Buck Melanoma on Sep 2, 2010 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh man
John got pwned.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Easy now
Next thing you know I’ll be getting hammered for saying mean things again when I was only joking.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
by Buck Melanoma on Sep 2, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Notice it was only BFTB staff that felt comfortable pointing it out.
Bolts from the Blue - Destroying your opinions with facts.
by John Gennaro on Sep 2, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Just how big a boy are you?
And do you carry a big stick as well?
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
by Buck Melanoma on Sep 2, 2010 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Is that a Forrest Gump paddle?
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
by Buck Melanoma on Sep 2, 2010 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions
11 to 14 wins. Major variable: Lights Out.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen;
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Sep 2, 2010 12:08 PM PDT reply actions
From the outside looking in
12-4 seems doable.
How do I break it to the cat that since he has been declawed, the rabbit he sees in our backyard would kick his sorry butt?
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Sep 2, 2010 2:29 PM PDT reply actions
12-4 seems possible but not likely
As is almost always the case, there will be some shocking losses.
Predicting the Chargers’ record is like predicting what AJ is gonna do on draft day. Way too many surprises to ever get it right.
12-4
I can honestly see us starting the season off 6-0. Our first 6 games consist of 5 teams that couldn’t pull out a .500 record last year and the Cardinals (who are rebuilding). I think we struggle with some of the “pass happy” teams like the Pats, Colts, Texans, and maybe CIN (depending on Palmers health), but I definitely like the Chargers chances in a shootout with any of those teams, as long as we have #17 on the field.
I’m a little concerned about the secondary but I’m optimistic Merriman’s gonna wreak some havoc this year, which should make those guys jobs a little easier.
Please don't read my signature.
I've got you guys at 12-4.
With losses
Oakland, vs New England, @Houston,Cincy
Yes, i have you beating the Colts, AGAIN…
Nobody cares ...
About the regular season. How far can we go into the playoffs with this team? Assuming Rivers stays healthy and we only take a few key injuries, how do we stack up to Indy, Pats, Steelers, Baltimore, and (dare I say) Jets going into the playoffs?
In the playoffs i think
You’d beat Indy regardless of location.
Patriots would be a tough one to pick, unless it was in the snow.
Steelers got your number.
Baltimore i think you’d win.
Jets you’d smoke this time.
Hope you are wrong about the Pats game
I live outside of Boston so they better not lose that one. Especially after losing their most experienced Corner they won’t be able to stop PR and the passing game.
My vote is 12-4. I think they lose to Denver, Houston, Indy, and San Fran. I could give reasons for all of them, but just going off a gut feeling at this time.
we lost jammer?
or are you referring to the man who’s only rolling on the ground with someone resulted in a whole lot of babys?
"i'm not inclined to resign to maturity"...PSYCH theme
by $#%@ eli and his daddy on Sep 2, 2010 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions
10-6
Bolts from the Blue // "It is what it is." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // "Richard is a jewel." - Kid Nate
I like that you have no arrests during the bye
I don’t like that you have us losing to all of the “premiere” teams. Luckily we only play 2.
Entertaining post
I wouldn’t be too upset with this regular season scenario.
I think the 12-4 is about right, give or take a win. I am more worried about KC away in the first game of the season than Jacksonville coming to the West Coast to ruin the Chargers’ home opener. Jacksonville can run the ball, but they are pretty one-dimensional offensively, a la Tennessee.
The only things I care about are:
1) Getting to the playoffs.
2) Beating the “L33T” teams, Patriots and Colts.
3) Getting to the Superbowl.
If any two of these get fulfilled, I’ll be happy… the Superbowl counts for 2.
"Never give up, even in defeat." I go for both the Bolts and the Vikings, so I guess you could call me Thor.
Winning the SuperBowl
Should be the only thing you care about. D:
"Just another Halo victory" - Rory Markas
the only win i want from them is the only that matters...
1 win. THE BIG ONE!
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!

by 


























