Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bill Stewart Dead From Apparent Heart Attack

3rd Easiest Schedule? A deeper look at the 2010 run of Games.

For this 2010-2011 Season, the Chargers have what is rated as the 3rd easiest schedule in the NFL. That doesn't mean that they will finish with the 3rd best record in the NFL, nor does it mean they can't finish with the Best (16-0, 15-1). They could always flop a couple of times and end up with a 10-6 record, but certainly, a Division crown is probably within reach without much of a case for it to go to another rival. But just because the strength of schedule calculates to a .453 winning percentage, doesn't mean that the Bolts have an easy shot at a first round bye...

Star-divide

Lets face it, the first three games are difficult lose. Kansas City is rebuilding, and will need a solid preseason to prove a tough opponent to the Division's big brother. Eric Berry being in coverage will mean Tim Jon McGraw won't be repeatedly toasted by the receiving corps during the course of the game, regardless of Vincent Jackson being suspended. It will be a test game for a team that is obviously focusing on their defense to improve. Jamaal Charles may prove to be challenging for Cam Thomas and the Rookie LB and Safety if Ron Rivera decides to let them get some early game reps, or 4th quarter starts if the Chiefs are down more than 2 scores.

Jacksonville has a good receiver and running game, which will also give some valuable playing time for the rookies. Ryan Mathews may have a good game against the Jags young line group and relatively slow secondary. Otherwise, this is one of those games that won't be too surprising.

Seattle is an awkward defensive group that can sometimes show up at a championship caliber, or get beat around like a group of second string high schoolers. Who knows what we'll see. Just let it be a win. A 3-0 start is critical, and you'll see why. Anything less is disappointing.

Arizona is where the season will really kick off. After three "Easy", "winnable", "cake-walk" etc... games, maybe the team will be to proud when facing a serious contender and get pushed around on the way to a devastating but eye opening home loss. Hopefully, Everyone is focused and ready to play hard, keeping in mind that the Cardinals are an excellent road team. A 4-0 start would kill talks of Norv being a little slow. Even if its true in some aspects.

Regardless of how week 4 turns out, Oakland will be ready to prove something. Jason Campbell, who isn't overly happy to be in Oakland (he said so when he stopped by my job to chat, among other things), will definitely be an upgrade, unless Jamarcus Russell ends up having a great preseason with 4 straight 100+ QB rating games and Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, and every other QB in the league simultaneously slips and tears their ACL on the way to Disney World. They are definitely a physical group who is dead tired of constantly getting raped ravaged by their bitter rivals. They obviously want that streak of a full seasons (almost) worth of losses to end. Since they'll be fresh off a match up with the Texans, a quick, big play offense similar to the Chargers, they'll be ready in a situational way.

Another rebuilding team will be hosting San Diego week 6, and probably want what they won't get. A win. There are too many question marks on the team. Then again, they almost beat New Orleans last season... it could be one of those crazy upsets where Rivers throws more than 2 picks for the first time in his career and... seriously, I'm joking. 6-0 or 5-1 would be fantastic to start the year.

The Patriots. The only team that refuses to have a city, let alone a state as their "home". All of New England? Not everybody loves Clam Chowder, Mr. Kraft. Though I must admit, Vermont barely has enough people to be considered a state. Enough with geography and demographics though. This game is a must win. Not just because the fan base of both teams seem to hate each other, but because of possible playoff seeding, and to validate having such a "weak" schedule. I'd love to see a close rematch of the 07 playoff game, with a younger, healthy version of LT running, a healthy Antonio Gates, and a healthy, elite Rivers and developed Vincent Jackson playing. I wish it was a Sunday night game, but whatever. This game is in late October, a seemingly difficult time for the Chargers to play in. Lets not overlook that this starts a difficult 3 game stretch. Factor in that the Pats are coming off a Bye and a game against the Ravens, and they'll be (mostly) fresh and ready to step up big time.

After what is sure to be a physical match with NE, comes another well known dirty physical team we love to play against. 2 physical matches in a row, against Intraconference Rivals. Not easy, regardless of the situation. You can't put a tag on that. Tennessee always plays hard, and they finished the season on a high note. Chris Johnson will probably be out to prove his worth, and hopefully, he'll be tackled before sprinting off to the endzone. Their defense will be healthier and should be a tougher task than the last time they were ripped to shreds by  #17.

The last time Houston faced San Diego, it was somewhat emotionally charged by the wildfires, and Cromartie started to show why he is was awesome. This time around, Houston is a much more complete team, and they are fast paced, something, although I don't like to admit it, is a little bit of an extra challenge for the Chargers' defensive group. They'll need to think fast and smart to hold the Texans below 24 points. And they'll need to give everything they can, since the bye week will provide time to rest. The next chunk of the schedule is harder than it looks, read why...

Philip Rivers is Mr. December. The King of the year's end. No one has dominated a single month like he has. He is undefeated in December. It seems the NFL wants to change that by organizing November and December to be a rough stretch.

First game after the Bye is a Monday night game against the Tebows Broncos and whatever they decide to do with their half roster of QBs. Like always, it will be a game to remember for whatever reasons. Hopefully, the Chargers, especially special teams, can exact revenge for last years nationally televised shibacle. Whoever is under center will have a hard time force feeding a dozen 6 yard drag passes to Brandon Marshall, and who knows what their depleted group of receivers will be capable of... but the Orange crush turned orange mush is getting older, and Williams may want to lay a couple guys down for some fun/evil reason to finally hit Rivers before he retires. Easily, a must win game.

Following a short week after what is sure to be a gritty game, comes a well known collision between two dominant teams at Indy. Its not a playoff preview just yet, but it is in Indy, so like the '07 playoff game, there may be some biased officiating and phantom holding calls on Eric Weddle when clearly Joseph Addai is yanking on his jersey and th... sorry. Still bitter. Anyway, what I meant was that it will be a close game and everyone will want to watch Manning vs Rivers and Merriman/Phillips vs Freeny/Mathis and Jackson/Gates vs Wayne/Clark and so on. Again, a must win. The Colts will be returning from a game against shared rival New England, so maybe they'll be just as beaten up. This is the second game in a tough 5 game stretch, followed by:

Oakland, week 13. The second match that will undoubtedly be difficult, especially if the Raiders are trying to defend against a 15th consecutive loss. Division games are almost always tough, great to have this game after 2 already tough games against rivals. What could make this time of the season any worse? Oh...

Kansas City. A Second consecutive division game, the third division team in 4 weeks. This shows that strength of schedule on paper is different when you factor in the game situation and schedule order. This will also be a hard game because if the season is going the way we hope it will, the Bolts will be fighting for a high seed in the playoffs, and both rivals Oakland and Kansas City may want to play spoiler. Kansas will definitely be better than they were week 1, so we'll see if they can pull the early upset after the Chargers come home from 3 very difficult games. Especially since their next game is...

Four days later. Thursday game on NFL network. San Francisco. They have a nasty Defense. Mike Singletary vs Ron Rivera. Two old buddies from Chi-town who will want to probably challenge each other and see who's got the rougher, tougher Defense. The 49ers are also getting a short week, but they aren't coming off a 4 game stretch of tough rivalry games. Their offense has talent, its just not put together 100%. A win is likely, less so for San Fran. At least the Bolts will have 3 extra days of rest for a pleasant game in...

Cincinnati. Late December. Chances are, the Chargers will be playing in bad, bad weather. "The forecast for today: Cold. Partly cloudy, with a high temperature of nothing. I mean zero. Wind chill from the 11mph northwest winds to be negative 12. Did we mention it will be cold? Wear a layer of jackets if you plan on being dumb enough to stand outside. It'll be cold." I'll probably go to that game. If I win that spacesuit on ebay. Nothing like resting up in 74 degree sweet sunny San Diego to head off to the extreme cold. Will the game stand as a Night Game? It might, if Snow is forecast and both teams have 10 wins or playoff spots to secure. Though they might prefer playing under the warm glow of the sun. At least the season finale will be... ugh...

Season ends at Mile High. In the Cold again. Damn you, Dr. Freeze. At this point in the season, the Chargers might just go to Denver to chill out if they have a seed locked up. But we don't want to see their "momentum" cool off either. They need to stay hot and play to win, that way they head into the playoffs with purpose. We'd hate to see them thaw out because of too much time playing half heartedly. This isn't one of those games you want to sit on ice. Its a division game against a cold hearted rival that would like nothing more than to freeze the Chargers' season to a stop with a chilling loss. It will also be cold at Invesco field, if you didn't get the subtle hints.

So there you have it. When you step back and look at the whole equation, instead of just the final result, you see that there is more to the season than the "29th hardest" schedule. The difficulty rated by the previous' season's win/loss results doesn't account for the order of games, or how the games will be arranged as far as division/ inter-intra conference match-ups. Because of the layout, the schedule is actually tougher than it seems. As much as the season could unfold into another 13-3 season and #2 seed, it could also turn into a 10-6 season and #4 seed, or worse, or better even, since its so darn EASY playing against 16 teams running onto a field with the same purpose, determination and reason as you. Lets hope everything turns out the way we would like it to and San Diego finishes with a top 3 seed and a chance to reach the Championship game.

Go Chargers!

This FanPost was written by a member of the Bolts From The Blue community and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bolts From The Blue editors or SB Nation.

Comment 60 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

GREAT POST

Very informative man. It get on my nerves people dont understand how crummy teams can give you a knock out drag down fight for 60 minutes if theyre division teams. And Oakland has been tough recently, Russel has bailed out the bolts a few times in the past. I dont think hell be playing by the end of the season, but we are talking about Al Davis here.

"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken"- Colonel Sanders

by traceSD on May 5, 2010 6:24 AM PDT reply actions  

Thanks guys....

though I was hoping for more feedback and comments. Maybe the article is too long? Most of my writing is…

by Superduperboltman on May 5, 2010 9:05 AM PDT reply actions  

a little

I actually read this post right away but was a little to busy to comment. I think there are a lot of other lurkers that visit and never say anything.

Anyhow, yes it was a little on the long and rambling side, but that’s what made it a good read. Nothing against our esteemed staff of writers, since I always love what is written, but you write in a different style and it breaks up the pace. I almost never look at who wrote an article, but can tell if it was penned by John, Wonko, Stephen, etc. I like your style and would encourage you to write more often. Its great to have different voices on the site.

If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong

by Diesel85 on May 5, 2010 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's well thought out....

…but you always have to take schedules with a huge grain of salt. Every year we look at the schedule and predict wins or losses; then, by week 10, our predictions seem ridiculous because some team we thought was a joke is suddenly playing very well and our game against the Patriots is actually a blow out because Tom Brady just tore his ACL.

by TheBoltEater on May 5, 2010 11:43 AM PDT reply actions  

You are right - we should

easily finish with a very impressive record (anywhere from 16-0 to 13-3 is very possible) but I am beginning to get weary about the AFC West. Both KC and Oak started to play good ball at the end of the season. Denver is still Denver the Jekyl-and-Hide of our conference. If we get off to a slow start like we have been doing the last couple of years then it is very possible for us to drop two early season games that we should have won. Remember the Raiders for intents-and-purposes outplayed us in the season opener last year.

I’m not implying that the AFC West is the “NFC East” but I think that the teams in this division have all improved.

by MacDeezul on May 5, 2010 5:38 PM PDT reply actions  

I think we'll also see improvement from the NFCW.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on May 5, 2010 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Indeed

KC and oakland just need to put themselves together and they’re 8-8 teams at a minimum. AZ and SF is all there is in the NFCW by the way. STL is…. barely a team and Seattle uh, has that guy…

by Superduperboltman on May 5, 2010 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

St Louis has a #1 rookie QB. So we don't know nothin'.

Seattle has a much-revamped OL, but they’re not exactly a hot team. Arizona will fall off, and SF will get better; between the two it’s a wash on paper, but we’re a better matchup against AZ, so that’s not good news for us.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on May 6, 2010 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can see the 9ers and Seattle improving

the Rams are probably a year or two away from even playing .500 ball. But I can definitely see Arizona going on the decline, with the loss of Warner, Bolden, and Rolle this off-season.

by SoCalBoltFan on May 6, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Don't forget Dansby, he's gone from AZ as well

There’s also no guarantee that Rodgers-Cromartie will be ready by the start of the season.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on May 6, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

When did KC start playing well?

I don’t recall that at all.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on May 6, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

2002, 2003. Something like that.

Why do you ask about ancient history?

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on May 6, 2010 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

denver

will be 7-9 9-7

okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider

by j-man on May 5, 2010 7:04 PM PDT reply actions  

you know what jman??

I’m a little disappointed in you for not having more faith in your team,even if it is the donkeys..lol

by Gorditoe1 on May 11, 2010 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Enjoyed reading the post

but considering the Chargers won their division last season I am not sure you could ask for a much easier schedule.

by JeromeB on May 6, 2010 12:49 PM PDT reply actions  

It could be easier...

swap out Indy and the Pats for Buffalo and Cleveland.
But odds are like 1.3:1 the Chargers win the division.

by Superduperboltman on May 6, 2010 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you win your division

you have to play the other division winners, so there was no getting around those games.

by JeromeB on May 6, 2010 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Chargers will sweep the raiders and split with kansas city and denver

I will put on a dress and post a picture on here if the Chargers sweep the Chiefs, but if We sweep the Chargers you must do the same and admit the Chargers are on the way out of the picture as being the sole team with talent in this division.In truth I see Kansas City and the Raiders as the top two teams in the division within 3 years.

step 1 collect underwear
step 2 ?????????????
step 3 profit

by I_AM_NINJA_2 on May 6, 2010 6:14 PM PDT reply actions  

I really think the Raiders might be better than the Chiefs this season.

Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on May 6, 2010 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't see it.

They’re still Oakland. You might wana wake up some :)

Eric Berry for Rookie of the Year

2010 Kansas Chiefs Record Range of 8-8 to 10-6. Yes it's possible, Chiefs just have to perform and execute

by KC Nate on May 7, 2010 4:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

I kind of agree

Oakland was held back tremendously by Russell. Look at what Gradkowski did when he stepped in. They both had disastrous moments, but I think Oakland is set defensively. KC is set offensively. But defense usually prevails in this division.

by Superduperboltman on May 7, 2010 6:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Raiders have been better than the Chiefs since mid-season 2007.

The last two years, the Chiefs have split twice with the Raiders and Broncos, and beaten Pittsburgh and Washington: one team with a winning record, and that was a 9-7 Steelers team that didn’t make the playoffs. The Raiders have split twice with the Chiefs and Broncos, and beaten the Jets, Houston, Tampa, Philly, Cincinnati and Pittsburgh: six teams with winning records, though only two made the playoffs.

Not hating on the Chiefs, or rather not any more than I hate on the Raiders (less, even, and only in good fun). But take it from this disinterested observer. Give the Raiders a mediocre QB, and they’re an average team. The Chiefs have a mediocre QB, and they’re still picking in the top 5. Not only that, but I don’t think they know how to build. A shiny new safety is a great thing, sure, but not if you don’t have any pass rush.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on May 7, 2010 8:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

More on Raiders-as-Giant-Killers (well, not THOSE Giants...)
  1. If the Chiefs or Raiders had lost to Pittsburgh, the Steelers would have been the #5 seed.
  2. If the Bengals had beaten the Raiders, they would have been able to play Baltimore in the WC, and maybe would have won a trip back to San Diego.
  3. If the Eagles had beaten the Raiders, they would have hosted the WC round, and maybe had a chance.
  4. If the Bucs beat the Raiders, they would have made the playoffs at.
  5. If the Jets beat the Raiders, their meaningless finale would have been for the division title.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on May 7, 2010 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Tamba Hali

The pass rush is there and still adding. Eric Berry was the starting option and cornerstone to rebuildindg this franchise. We needed the speed and play making ability he will give us. He will be there challenging for rookie of the year honors. Eric Berry was the smart choice in continuing our “rebuilding”. Pioli isn’t rebuilding, he’s making a team to win NOW. Look for Eric Berry to pick of Rivers atleast once in week 1.

I laugh at anyone who says Oakland’s been or is better than us, much less since 2007.

Eric Berry for Rookie of the Year

2010 Kansas Chiefs Record Range of 8-8 to 10-6. Yes it's possible, Chiefs just have to perform and execute

by KC Nate on May 7, 2010 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not sure what your laughing at

The Chiefs finished in last place this past season (behind the Raiders). The Chiefs finished in last place in 2008 (behind the Raiders). The Chiefs finished in last place in 2007 (congratulations, tied with the Raiders). And I fully expect the Chiefs to finish in last place in the division again this year.
Not sure why you think the Chiefs have been better than the Raiders since 2007 and not sure why you think they will be this year. But I guess its to be respected that you blindly stand by your team.

by JeromeB on May 7, 2010 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I am laughing...

Out of all the times we have played the Chargers and Raiders…We have won more games. We own the series.

Jamaal Charles...Enough said.

by Chiefsfan85 on May 7, 2010 9:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hali is on the downslope

And is just one guy. He was a lot better when he had Jared Allen opposite, too.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on May 7, 2010 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Define downslope...

Tamba’s stats two years ago: 54 total tackles, 3 sacks, 3 forced fumbles

Tamba’s stats last year: 62 total tackles, 8.5 sacks, 4 forced fumbles, and a safety.

Seems like all his stats improved. How is that a downslope? Oh, Tamba’s best year with Jared Allen on other side was 61 total tackles, 8 sacks, and 5 forced fumbles. Seems like the same guy no matter who is on the field with him. So you were proven wrong not once, but twice.

Jamaal Charles...Enough said.

by Chiefsfan85 on May 8, 2010 4:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Just curious Bolthead...

If you where picking at 5 and had to pick a guy at 5 to be a pass rusher who would of been worthy of that? noboy IMO Berry was the obvious pick there..Im just curious?

by tomahawk44 on May 12, 2010 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Berry was a value pick. Russell Okung or Anthony Davis was the pick everyone was hoping for.

by Superduperboltman on May 12, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're kidding right? Value picks are not safeties in the top 5

Berry was picked because that kind of player only comes around every 5-10 years or so.

Only those that think Branden Albert is a complete failure wanted Okung, and Davis would have been a reach.

by cpa913 on May 12, 2010 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

My understanding

Is that the Chiefs didn’t like Okung as much anyway since he wasn’t the best fit for their blocking schemes. If they were going to go LT then Trent Williams would have been their best option. Once you consider that, then picking Berry makes even more sense. Why pick a guy who others rate high because he does things your team doesn’t value?

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on May 12, 2010 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ah. Okay.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on May 13, 2010 7:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly, sort of.

The Chiefs had a big need at O-line and chose to continue picking secondary players. Both Carr and Flowers are solid corners who continue to improve. The safety position was (is) not a strong point so it was a decent shot. Similar to what AJ Smith did last year with the #16 pick. I hoped for Michael Oher instead of English. But no, AJ had an insurance need for Merriman. Good Safeties can me found in any round, but all I’m saying is the Chiefs could have drafted an immediate need, and chose to pick a secondary need too early.

by Superduperboltman on May 13, 2010 6:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Pass-rusher? Huh? No, Okung!

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on May 12, 2010 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

the reason I asked about the pass rusher is b/c this comment you made.
Not only that, but I don’t think they know how to build. A shiny new safety is a great thing, sure, but not if you don’t have any pass rush.

by tomahawk44 on May 13, 2010 7:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that too.

Three things count more than anything else. QB, pass protection, pass rush. Coverage doesn’t matter as much, which doesn’t mean it’s not important. Good QBs with time get things done. You can’t make the other QB worse as reliably, so you can get a good QB, give him time, or take time away from the other QB. The Chiefs have invested a ton in a QB who’s still not showing he’s earned it, but he’s their man for now. They’ve got a mediocre line and a poor pass-rush; upgrading either one is the fastest way to improve.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on May 13, 2010 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Richard is right.

If the Broncos really suffer from this strange offseason, the Raiders could easily be the #2 in the division. I’m picking Oakland for 7 wins, but I can see how they could snake it into the #6 seed. Then again, any team can collapse at any time, and if something bizarre happens, the Raiders could be in position to host a January game by some outside, extremely unlikely chance.

I think the Broncos are in better shape going forward than either of the other two, but they may stutter a bit this year. I don’t think the Chiefs can compete: I don’t trust their QB, OL or pass rush, and so I can’t rate them highly. This is do-or-die time for Oakland. They have to be in the WC contention at a minimum this year, or they won’t do it in Al Davis’s lifetime. Next season it’s the NFCN and AFCE, and there will be no WC opportunity.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on May 7, 2010 8:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Chargers are on the way out....

That is truth if you want to believe it or not. If you did not have Rivers you would be in the same boat as we are except your team is losing talent every year and we are gaining talent. Oakland is NOT a better team than us by any means. The Chargers will most likely lead the AFC West this year,but what I said is" they won’t sweep us". Also if you guys choke yet again you are running out of time. The Chiefs QB had to learn alot in one year with the same guy running QB,Offense, and the entire team(Haley). It’s ok though cause you’ll get a sneak peek of the baddest two headed monster in the game on Monday Night. 6 yards per carry, I mean who even needs a QB when they can’t stop the run?Add the fact we signed a NT,OL,WR, and drafted a Slot WR, and THE BEST SAFETY IN COLLEGE? We also have all sorts of return men now so we won’t start at our own 10 yardline every possesion. Just saying when the bum(The Chiefs 2 you) gets up and pisses on your leg(Your dreams) don’t be shocked cause I won’t. 1 year to get the organization together and the players to bond and learn the system you’ll see. Another thing you guys must forget we Played tight games w/ Pitt.,Bal,Cowboys etc…and smashed Denver to the moon in the last game we played. Can you guys stop TJ and JC and Mccluster I really don’t think so. Last thing Eric Berry will prove he was worth the pick when he comes around the corner on a blitz and puts River’s dick in the dirt.lol that’s my prediction for Monday night 24-17 Chiefs

step 1 collect underwear
step 2 ?????????????
step 3 profit

by I_AM_NINJA_2 on May 8, 2010 10:49 AM PDT reply actions  

Cute post

Its a little early to throw around scores. If I recall, Billy Volek did a fine job in that divisional win over Indy. Norv could handle Rivers being on the bench for whatever reason. I think you could turn your internet ferociousness down a little bit. Its just splendid that you’re understandably trapped in a gigglefest with yourself thinking about what may be, but don’t call out your winning horse until they at least reach the gate. By the way, its taken a little longer than one year to put the organization together. The last 3 years have been a cluster of hits and misses too random to justify even the first stone in rebuilding. That’s what this year is supposed to be. I’m sure the Chefs have talent to be a wild card team, but it will more than likely be next year at the least when they can pull out of the gutter with a winning record.

by Superduperboltman on May 8, 2010 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

lies!

it took the rams one year to go from 3-13 to 13-3 and SB Champs thanks to the best grocery bagger ever.

Aybar is a nowhere man, Sitting in his Nowhere Land, Making all his nowhere plans for nobody.

by princeton11loveshalos on May 10, 2010 1:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

This isn’t about a B league team. Its about the Chiefs. Rams have to part in this thread.

by Superduperboltman on May 10, 2010 7:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

This from a Broncos fan: the Chargers are in charge till somebody proves otherwise.

The Bolts have rightfully earned the respect of the rest of the West. And AJ has, once again, proved himself to be one of the best, if not the best.

Meaning no disrespect for you team, I also think the rest of the AFC West is looking better. I think it started last year but all three clubs have made some good moves so far this year. The Chiefs still have some holes to fill but they drafted some good personnel. And their best moves might have been with their coaching staff on both sides of the ball. The Raiders may have actually stopped shooting themselves in the foot. Their defense has been solid the last couple of years, but their draft looks fairly competent for a change, and the addition of Campbell plus the subtraction of Russell very well could help them finally turn the corner.

And as for my Broncos? I know its popular to think of McDaniels as an out-of-touch, egocentric megalomaniac, but having watched what he’s been doing for the last year and a half I’d have to say I believe anyone who thinks that is going to be in for a rude awakening.

Last year, though many laughed, he immediately upgraded the defense, especially the DB’s. This year, he’s taken a little bit of a chance, as you know on the D-line, but collectively, they may very well be much better, much deeper. AAdd he’s added even more young talent to the D-backfield. I still worry a little bit about the LBs, but we’ll see.

I like to think he also upgraded the offense last year despite the trade of Cutler. That offense was nowhere near as flashy but it also stopped turning over the ball, especially in the red zone. Moreno will have a better year this year as the Broncos move one year deeper into their switch to a power running game and there maybe a CFA that could surprise a lot of folks. The WRs he drafted are going to make everybody forget Brandon Marshall. The O-line, which I think got a little exposed last year, has gotten deeper, and bigger, and nastier.
  
And then there’s Tebow. Think what you want but this young man is on a mission and I think he’s going to open more than a few eyes.

Wiser men than me have said the Broncos are still a year away and the Chiefs and Raiders, maybe a year longer. But the day is coming, and I don’t think it’s too far off, when everybody else in the NFL is going to dread facing a team from the AFC West.

If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!

by Trinidad Jack on May 12, 2010 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

The AFC Best will in fact

Rise again. I actually think next year the West could be like the AFC South was in 07. Totally Dominant. At least a division with only one losing record team though. The NFC East is somewhat falling apart as the “best” division. The AFC East is rising and the NFC South as well. (maybe).

by Superduperboltman on May 13, 2010 5:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think McDaniels is doing a fine job.

Last year, they really weren’t a playoff team, but they sure played like they were until they ran out of steam. This year, their more limited weapons might keep their window closed, but I don’t think that will last long. McD has his QB, C and WRs of the future, even if they’re not yet ready for prime time.

Cutler will always be the star of a mediocre team. He giveth with one hand and taketh with the other, chalking up yards but coughing up picks, and then blaming his teammates. He had to go, and the Bears took a sucker’s bet with him. Orton will never be confused for a HOF’er, but you know what you’re getting. Tebow either is or isn’t a star-in-training, nobody knows. I suspect he’ll be a good-but-not-great NFL QB, with a couple superior seasons and maybe a shortish career, but I could be wrong on any of those counts.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on May 13, 2010 7:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

I can see that.

QB, C, and WR (among others) are really tough positions to just step into and do well right out of the gate. That doesn’t mean it can’t be done, it just takes a remarkable individual to do it. Time will tell on all these guys.

I totally agree on Cutler. If you want to be a leader and a winner, you don’t throw your team mates under the bus. And I understand everybody’s caution concerning Tebow. I like to think we may have a young star on our hands but he hasn’t even stepped on a playing field yet so we’ll have to see. One thing’s for sure though, things are going to be really interesting for a while and you can’t ask for more than that.

If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!

by Trinidad Jack on May 13, 2010 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hey

Yup, I'm the nut who believes Mark Loretta is a possible future Hall of Famer.

by StrangeBroP25 on May 8, 2010 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

your lucky it's week one

Since we seem to start off slowly and build momentum, your lucky that you play us in week one, and at home no less. We’ll have to wait and see how our defense stacks up against the run this year. But, we lost several starters last year in game one and we have added some players on defense. So, the defense is a question mark right now. But, it would be hard for them to be as bad as last year. You also didn’t mention how poor our running game was last year. That should be improved this year meaning teams will actually have to defend against the run and not just blitz on almost every down. So, if our offense can hang onto the ball longer (TOP) then our defense should be much fresher in the second half. I think our average time of possession last year was 29:30. If we can improve that to over 30:00 a game, that will help our defense. 30 seconds in a close game can be the difference in a W or a L.

by irishlad on May 28, 2010 8:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

last year don't mean squat

Yeah, there are teams that are perennial powder puffs, but eams do change from one year to the next. It wasn’t long ago that cinncinatti was considered a “gimme” win. And, as we all know, the raiders just seem to play their hardest against us (especially the defense) and, unless our defense is much improved over last year, I don’t really see many “easy” games. I’m not sure if the defense is not that good from a personnel standpoint or coaching standpoint. But, I’m leaning toward coaching. Rivera seems to play “not to lose” insted of playing to win. Sometimes you have to force the other team to make a mistake, not just drop back and hope for a mistake. He should know which players are capable of being “turned lose” and which ones you need to back up. Myself, I wish we played more man defense insted of this soft zone crap all the time. How many times has a defender released a player expecting someone else to pick him up and the guy ended up un covered? I realize in man coverage that if you get beat or fall down it could be a big gain but anyone remember the raiders scoring a touchdown while the two defenders pointed at each other.

by irishlad on May 14, 2010 8:57 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm mostly with you.

Like our ‘08 schedule was supposed to be really soft, but we ended up playing 7 teams with 11+ wins. This year, I don’t think it’ll be like that, but it still might be tough. Not looking at last year’s records, I’d still say this schedule doesn’t look bad.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on May 14, 2010 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


BFTB Apparel Store

Bftbshirtstore_medium

Facebook

Chargers on Twitter


Managers

Paddlin_small John Gennaro

Assistant Editors

Dont-panic-thumb_small Wonko

Pomeranian_of_war_small Richard Wade

Antonio_small creanium

Columnists

Sdclogo2_small Orz

Tn_small Jeff (sliderockmpc)

Wrong_small_small Superduperboltman

Screen_shot_2011-08-05_at_2 jkvandal