Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Tales from the Uniformed Armchair GM (Final Eight Teams)

With the official start of the free agent season kicking off today I thought it might be a good idea to explain the new free agency rules that have been put in place this offseason.  With the uncapped year in effect this upcoming season some new restrictions have been put in place on the ability the teams that played in the divisional playoff series last season (The Top Eight Teams) have on signing free agents.

The Rules

Here is a basic outline of the free agency rules for the teams that finished in the top eight last season:

  • The final eight teams may sign an unrestricted free agent to replace each unrestricted free agent they lose to another club, as long as they don't offer a higher salary than what their lost player will receive from his new club.
  • The final four teams (Saints, Colts, Jets and Vikings) will only be allowed to negotiate and sign additional unrestricted free agents (other than to replace the ones they lost) if the player acquired their free agent status by being cut or were on a final four team when their contract expired.
  • The teams that lost in the divisional round of the playoffs (Chargers, Ravens, Cardinals and Cowboys) may sign one player with a salary over $4,925,000 in his first season.
  • The divisional losers also may sign any number of players with a first-year salary of no more than $3,275,000 and an annual increase of no more than 30 percent in the following years.

Star-divide

The Reasoning

 

The NFL and its Players Union agreed to these rules in the case of uncapped year in order to try and keep parity around the league and prevent a major market team (like the Cowboys) from having a Yankee's type off season.  Since NFL contracts are not guaranteed it would be easy for major market teams to cut their lower and/or mid level players and outbid the smaller market teams around the league for top end free agents to replace them with (like most of us do when we play Madden).  

 

How Much Will this Affect the Chargers?

During AJ Smith's tenure as GM, the Chargers have not shown too much interest in singing high profile free agents.  Without a major philosophical shift in the front office this season should not be much different.  While the Chargers do have a major hole to fill at running back and may need to shore up a few other positions (DT, OL, ILB and DB) I really don't foresee them going after any free agents who would require a starting salary over $3,275,000 and require more than a 30% increase in pay an any subsequent seasons, so these rules should not really have an affect the Chargers of season plans.

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

According to Florio

Eight teams were interested in Cromartie including Wade Phillips and the Cowboys.

by BFDC on Mar 5, 2010 8:36 AM PST reply actions  

maybe try posting this over on the Cromartie trade article???

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Mar 5, 2010 8:39 AM PST up reply actions  

I would have, but people usually like to dive into the newest article and comment. No?

by BFDC on Mar 5, 2010 8:42 AM PST up reply actions  

Stephen is right

We like to keep the conversation on-topic. It’ll stay here this time so that everybody can see.

Also, everyone is interested in a former Pro Bowl CB with ridiculous potential. That doesn’t mean anything. The Cowboys might’ve been interested enough to send the Chargers a 6th round pick. Hell, I would’ve given the Chargers $5 so that Cro could play on my rec league team. Doesn’t that make me interested?

"When they come for me I'll be sitting at my desk, with a gun in my hand wearing a bullet-proof vest, singing 'My, my, my, how the time does fly when you know you're going to die by the end of the night.'" - Catch 22

by John Gennaro on Mar 5, 2010 8:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Hahah good point… but I guess it probably shows the Chargers wouldn’t have had to outright release him.

BTW, I re-posted it in the Cromartie topic. I Just thought I’d post it in the most recent topic as it keeps conversation going with the touch of the “Z” button without having to go back and forth between the home page.

by BFDC on Mar 5, 2010 9:00 AM PST up reply actions  

I understand why you did it, but a lot of BFTB’s traffic comes externally (Google, SI.com, Yahoo Sports, CBSsports.com, etc) and goes directly to the article. If the topic is discussed here instead, they may never see it.

"When they come for me I'll be sitting at my desk, with a gun in my hand wearing a bullet-proof vest, singing 'My, my, my, how the time does fly when you know you're going to die by the end of the night.'" - Catch 22

by John Gennaro on Mar 5, 2010 9:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Interesting to note

That as restrictive as this may sound, the Chargers have easily met these requirements every year under the AJ regime. So as long as you’re not the Redskins, it shouldn’t affect you too much to be a final 8 team.

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Mar 5, 2010 8:38 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

The Panthers released 345 lb. NT Maake Kemoeatu

Apparently he is rehabbing from a torn Achilles, but plans to be ready for the start of the season. Maybe he’s worth a look.

by BFDC on Mar 5, 2010 8:48 AM PST reply actions  

Saw that

I don’t know much about him, except that he’s big and old (31). Kris Jenkins came from a similar circumstance and blossomed as a 3-4 NT…..and we don’t have much depth there……I’d say it’s worth a shot if the price isn’t too high.

"When they come for me I'll be sitting at my desk, with a gun in my hand wearing a bullet-proof vest, singing 'My, my, my, how the time does fly when you know you're going to die by the end of the night.'" - Catch 22

by John Gennaro on Mar 5, 2010 8:59 AM PST up reply actions  

345lbs NT coming back from an injury, as a free agent?

we just got rid of this situation. sorta’, maybe. AJ has made it clear he’s moving on from players that can’t stay healthy, and cost a lot of money. they can’t replace JW, but it looks like they can compete without him.

The peanut gallery has spoken!!!

by gatesoftds on Mar 5, 2010 9:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Be prepared to slightly alter that post...

…if and when the Chargers re-sign JW. The Chargers just “got rid of the situation” by getting rid of the contract. But they still like JW, they want JW, they need JW. Or someone like him.

by Andy (allfield) on Mar 5, 2010 9:40 AM PST up reply actions  

hence the "sorta, maybe", insert...

i think they want to see who takes the bait. and maybe rework JW deal.

The peanut gallery has spoken!!!

by gatesoftds on Mar 5, 2010 11:24 PM PST up reply actions  

The current meaning makes it kind of funny…

Sorry to be the annoying grammar guy, but in The Reasoning section, it is "parity", not "parody". :) Here are definitions for both if you‘re interested in reading the difference in meaning between them: Parody | Parity

Otherwise, great article. :)

by rossr89 on Mar 5, 2010 10:35 AM PST reply actions  

for the record

I liked it better with Parody. While it does make less sense, I have a mental image of circus clowns tumbling out of a small car and then trying to sign free agents.

I say switch it back.

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Mar 5, 2010 10:52 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Circus music!

@Stephen Hilarious! Queue the circus music! :)

by rossr89 on Mar 5, 2010 11:00 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


BFTB Apparel Store

Bftbshirtstore_medium

Facebook

Chargers on Twitter


Managers

Bftbdog_medium_medium_small John Gennaro

Assistant Editors

Dont-panic-thumb_small Wonko

Pomeranian_of_war_small Richard Wade

Close_up4_small Steve Adler

Antonio_small creanium

Columnists

Guybrush_small Zach (maestro876)

Sdclogo2_small Orz

Tn_small Jeff (sliderockmpc)

Wrong_small_small Superduperboltman

Screen_shot_2011-08-05_at_2 jkvandal