Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Sob City: Clippers Swept By Spurs

San Diego Chargers: Who are we?

So with all this talk about the upcoming draft and who we should pick I thought that it would be interesting to reflect upon how confident or "set" we are at all the positions.  Now this is only my opinion and I welcome your thoughts on the subject as well – as always.  So what I am going to attempt to do is address each position (or group of positions where it applies) and rank them 1- 10, with 1 being the best and 10 being the worst, on how well we match up.

 

1.      QB:  Phillip Rivers is the man.  I always liked Drew Brees and was nervous when the organization decided to just let him go.  But up until that last year there Brees always seemed to be the one who made the wrong play when we needed him to make a GREAT play.  Rivers on the other hand seems to have that innate ability to make those tough plays and lead us to that crucial score more often than he makes a bad play.  Rivers hasn’t been injury prone to the extent where he can’t play.  I think he is quickly ascending the ranks of QBs in the league and is worthy of any "top 5" active QB discussions in the league.

 

2.      LB:  We are not only talented here, we are also relatively deep at this position.  The three SH-Migo’s (Shawne, Shaun, and & Stephen) are beginning to play at a very high-level.  Say what you will about Merriman but when he is on the field he demands attention and most of the time it is in the disguise of double-teams.  With Brandon Siler making his name known by not 1 but 2 consecutive goal line stops against the Cowboys I think that he too may be on the rise as well.

 

Star-divide

 

3.      WR:  We are getting really good here too.  Especially if you add in the Holy Gates.  We may run into depth issues here in the next couple years as our young stars begin to "feel-themselves" but as it stands right now we have the perfect complement of receivers to match our QB and offensive scheme.  We could get better with a true 3rd receiver that is lightning quick but its not hurting us right now.

 

4.      TE:  Antonio Gates is a monster.  Defenses simply can’t match up against him.  We also have decent depth at this position for what we use it for.  Sure we could add another TE here so that we can run an effective 2 TE set on passing-downs but if you need to add another TE to block so that we can either run or pass then the problem isn’t our TE, its our line.

 

 

5.      FB:  I only put this position in there because we have to and they have a specialized skill.  I like Jacob Hester because he is a football player.  But size and strength is not two of his greatest assets.  I think the position belongs to Tolbert.  Our FB has to lead block, catch the occasional pass out the backfield, and every now-and-then carry the ball.  If we were to compare this position to other teams with bonafide FBs (say like L. McClain in Baltimore) where would we be?  Maybe, LT becomes a 1000 yard back again.

 

6.      DL:  We are missing something here.  Yeah we have depth and a bunch of good players but we don’t have that "cog" in the middle that demands you run left or run right.  We don’t have that "cog" in the middle that says if you use two or more lineman to block me in passing situations then I’m gonna send a missle from my ILB position to crush your QB.  We just don’t have it.  Our defensive ends don’t make enough plays for me either – on a side note I think Albert Haynesworth is the perfect 3-4 end.  If our defensive line was more effective our corps of linebackers would wreak havoc on the opposing team.

 

 

7.      OL: We have two good potentially great players in this line up I think – LT (M. McNeill) and Center (N. Hardwick).  After that we have serviceable talent at the remainder of the positions on our offensive line.  And we don’t have depth either.  Injuries seem to have plagued this group the last 2 or 3 years as well, forcing us to constantly play musical chairs with our linemen.  The proof of how bad we became is in our rushing stats.  31st?!  With one of, if not the greatest, running backs we have ever had in Charger’s history?!  If it wasn’t for our passing scheme orchestrated almost to perfection by N. Turner and P. Rivers our passing game would have suffered as well.  But ultimately it’s mentality when it comes to running the ball and if the offensive line can’t get a 1 yard push off the line of scrimmage then more than likely your running game is going to be non-existent for the most part. 

 

8.      DB:  I think Eric Weddle is enroute to becoming a great safety in the same form or fashion as John Lynch was with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.  Q. Jammer is a good (better than average) but not great corner who does everything (zone coverage, man coverage, tackling) well but just not great.  But overall our DBs suck.  They let WRs catch the ball and then tackle them.  It would be nice to have DBs whose mentality is one either "when the ball is in the air, it belongs to me" or "the QB may be throwing the ball to you, but you aren’t going to catch it."  If we could find that one cover guy who is good enough to make Jammer the #2 corner then we would be great here.  The problem is the one we drafted before to do this could never unseat him.  As a result we remained vulnerable to the pass when we had to rely on our DBs to make a play.

 

9.      RB:  We do not only need 1 RB, we need 2!  And preferably a third as well.  We don’t have a single back on the roster who has proven capable of carrying the rock all three downs in a series.  Sproles is great for the role that he plays in our offense but I doubt there is anyone who would disagree with the fact that he is not the answer at this position.  We picked up marcus mason from the Redskins and that’s great, he may become a suitable number 2 but I don’t see him as a fulltime starter as the RB.

 

So there you have it.  My analysis on our teams strengths and weaknesses.  What do you think?  There could be some tweaking to the list and minor switches in the rankings but overall I think that this captures "who we are" pretty-well.  Now if we flip this list upside down, maybe we have just identified our drafting priorities….. maybe.

This FanPost was written by a member of the Bolts From The Blue community and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bolts From The Blue editors or SB Nation.

Comment 73 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

fun times

I like a lot, although Weddle will never hit like Lynch. It’s just not going to happen.

by not humble enough on Mar 23, 2010 7:54 AM PDT reply actions  

But he is white!

by BORTZ on Mar 23, 2010 9:27 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

He can hit when he doesn't have to take a risk to do it.

You’ve seen it happen several times last year. I think he just prefers to ensure the tackle, than to take a risk and miss on a big hit, then let the guy run 50 yards downfield.

by SJO on Mar 25, 2010 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Seriously

I think Kevin Boss and Jonnie Lee Higgins would agree, Weddle can hit pretty hard.

by SoCalBoltFan on Mar 25, 2010 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Idk about that..

Remember the game against the Jets (of course you do!), he got to Mark Sanchez and was dancing with him for such a long time and couldn’t get him on the ground! The referee finally stopped the play and that was that.

by Leonardo Velazquez on Mar 30, 2010 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

That doesn't change the fact

that he knocked Higgins and Boss into the next week. You don’t remeber those plays?

by SoCalBoltFan on Mar 30, 2010 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Draft

Chargers are gonna have to make some important picks.
1st round I hope they get either an O-lineman specifically Right Tackle to help da run.Or D tackle
2nd round D-tackle
3rd- is when I think they should get a running back but I hope they pick good

Reppin SD (Z-G)

by BFTB_zach on Mar 23, 2010 9:24 AM PDT reply actions  

Our DBs hardly suck

And Cooper I doubt has ever played at a high level.

by Foilhat on Mar 23, 2010 9:47 AM PDT reply actions  

Well he did

lead the team in tackles (102 total; 71 solo, 31 ast) followed by Eric Weddle with 82 total. And for a defense that finished 3rd overall (1. Ravens, 2. Vikings) in total yards per game…….. well I think saying he played at a high-level is appropriate.

by MacDeezul on Mar 23, 2010 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t think we were third in the league is yards per game….

If anything we did a good job and bend but don’t break, meaning we game up lots of yards, but not points. I am a Cooper fan, but he needs a good DL in front of him in order to have an impact, and he did not have that last year.

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Mar 23, 2010 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

"good" is such a strong word.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 23, 2010 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

He should lead the team in tackles

He played SAM more than anyone else. That just makes statistical sense to me.

by Foilhat on Mar 23, 2010 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

If an ILB doesn't lead his teams in tackles every year

there’s a problem. Also, the fact the SS (Weddle) had the second most tackles on team is not neccessarily a good thing.

by SoCalBoltFan on Mar 23, 2010 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah a Safety leading or near the top

in team tackles is not a good thing. For the most part MLBs and ILBs lead the league in tackles, with a few Safeties in the mix. Here is a list of them:
T. Branch – 124(Oak),
E. Coleman – 116 (ATL),
B. Dawkins – 116 (Den),
Y. Bell – 114 (Mia),
J. Babineaux – 104 (Sea),
M. Brown – 103 (KC),
G. Wilson – 103 (Buf),
R. Harper – 102 (NO),
B. Pollard – 102 (Hou),
A. Bethea – 95 (Ind) ,
L. Delmas -94 (Det),
D. Goldsson – 94 (SF),
G. Wilson – 93 (Mia),
D. Manning – 92 (Chi)

What does 11 of the 13 teams listed here (Mia – twice) have in common? They didn’t make the playoffs. So you have a point that having a Safety with a high number of tackles is not necessarily a good thing; and that our DL might need to be addressed sooner than later.

by MacDeezul on Mar 23, 2010 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

The DL does need to be adressed

and I’m thinking the Chargers will most likely pull the trigger on a DT in one of the first two rounds (depending on whos on the board at #28). The fact that Weddle is near the top in team tackles is an indication that Weddle is being used for a lot of run support instead of ball hawking. If we can get an Elite 3 down NT, the secondary will most likely improve as well as our run defense.

by SoCalBoltFan on Mar 24, 2010 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

as for our DBs

Okay. Statistically it says that they don’t suck. But watching them actually play in the game? Well I can’t tell you how many 3rd conversions we let happen in front of one of our defenders, or over the top of them, or beside them, or under them….. they are great tacklers, no doubt, but what about an occasional INT once in awhile – we had 14 total last year. 14 for the WHOLE TEAM. That’s less than 1 per game; and only one of those were returned for points. To me this means that our defenders where not in position, more often than not, to make the INT. This means to me we have a bunch of nickel backers on our team moreso than starters….. but that’s just me.

by MacDeezul on Mar 23, 2010 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Suffice to say...

…if you’re giving a QB 7 seconds to throw the ball, the likelihood of him completing a pass increases immensely. Point being without the pressure from the front seven, any teams DBs are going to look like they suck. Add to that a system that plays a lot of zone and you’ve got a recipe for certain players to look worse than they really are.

by Andy (allfield) on Mar 23, 2010 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

We ran a ton of cover 3 this year. It can lead to fewer interceptions and balls completed infront of CBs, but it does limit big plays. In fact I think we ranked very well in this regard, especially versus the pass.

A bunch of “nickel backers” also seems like a derogatory term. Im not sure you understand thats the hardest position to play in the secondary. If you want to argue we need another safety, fine that makes some sense. But we had good corner play last year even if it didnt result in a ton of INTs. Calling Coops play elite is where you start to lose me.

Our secondary didnt lose the playoff game last year, despite Cro’s non attempted to tackle. Our offense sputtered and our front 7 was ran over.

by Foilhat on Mar 23, 2010 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

I respectfully have to disagree.

Zone coverage is like playing man coverage in a specific area (your zone). When it is played aggressively and correctly then you get interceptions. We are tied for 20th in the league for team interceptions… no matter what defensive scheme you play, man or zone, that isn’t acceptable.

I do use the term “nickel backers” as a derogatory term because a nickel back has not earned the right to be on the field every down on defense – they are the #3 DB on the team. So to have a team full of nickel backers I am implying that we have a team of corners that would not warrant a number 1 or 2 spot on more than half of the other teams in the league.

You are right that our DB’s didn’t lose the game for us but the did give up 1 passing TD and 1 Rushing TD (thanks Cro) in that game. Not that the game wasn’t winnable – hell three missed field goals (2 reasonably makeable) in a playoff game is definately not going to help your chances of winning.

by MacDeezul on Mar 23, 2010 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

“Zone coverage is like playing man converge in your zone”. I realize that defending grass is pointless, but this is a strange way of stating that. When all coverage is played correctly you should have more INTs, but I (unlike you) would put most of that on the front 7 not the back 4.

And you completed ignored my point about the Chargers limiting explosive plays (ranking 3rd defensively in passes over twenty yards).
Yeah I understand you think of a NB as a 3rd corner, and I understood your original intention to make the title NB some sort of scrub term. And I simply pointed out that it was a difficult position to play, but maybe I should have said that your knowledge seems misguided to put it nicely.

Yes our DBs didnt loose the game, and they were not the problem last year. For the 3rd time I believe it was the front 7.

by Foilhat on Mar 23, 2010 6:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Which is why we'll pick an NT before a DB

and pick an ILB with our 3rd or 4th rounders. Cooper is a borderline starter and someone needs to push him for his job. But yeah, I second the argument that the front 7, specifically the front 3, need to be addressed more so than the DBs.

by mikethemover on Mar 23, 2010 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not going to say I'd be surprised if we drafted an ILB

But, I’d wonder why we tendered a backup like Dobbins just to replace him in the draft.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 23, 2010 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

You can pull the tender

But I dont like Dobbins will be the ILB that get pushed off the roster I think it’ll be Coop. Which is a statement I realize many people will disagree with because he is penciled in as the starter.

The guy I want in the 3rd is Jamar Chaney even if we have to trade up to land him.

by Foilhat on Mar 23, 2010 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Donald Butler, U-Dub

I like what this guy brings to the table. Smart on and off the field, a natural leader, and plays up to the competition (see USC game). Not to mention he runs a 4.6 (with a sprained ankle) and put up 35 reps at the combine (4th most OVERALL. Yes, that includes all those linemen). Unfortunately, there’s little tape on him. If you go to nfldraftscout.com and look him up there’s a few highlights. On youtube he gives an interview and this kid seems like he’s got “it”.

by mikethemover on Mar 24, 2010 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

*I dont think

(I do like Dobbins at least he gets better every year and is solid covering kicks)

by Foilhat on Mar 23, 2010 10:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

C'mon

The only reason you are saying Cooper will be cut is because of your dislike for him. You’re thinking like you instead of thinking like A.J. The GM will cut the backup if he drafts a new guy and keep the presumptive starter. Its simply a matter of keeping your talent level high. If they didn’t think Cooper was better then Dobbins would have been the starter.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 24, 2010 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Coop will definitely be gone after 2011 though

maybe after this year if we can draft someone to challenge him. He’s not an asset at all. Sure, gets tackles because he can fill up the gaps but in space he’s average at best. We need a game-changer, someone who can force turnovers. He’s proven he’s not that type of player and at 31 he never will be.

by mikethemover on Mar 24, 2010 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

Wonko acts like I dislike Coop as a person or something, which is laughable. I just happen to think he’s not good and not getting better thats all.
If he’s not the starter he’s certainly not a ST teamer or developmental guy at his pay and age; Im not sure what he is anymore.
I guess referring to him as not a asset, average at best player who is 31 and not getting better would be accurate.

by Foilhat on Mar 25, 2010 7:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

It is laughable

That is why I never said you dislike Coop as a person.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 26, 2010 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah maybe you're right

But I heard the same kind of stuff when Wiffer was cut. Not accusing you of this, but people said “starters dont get cut backups do”. And I tried to point out that starters that suck better play STs or they will get cut.

by Foilhat on Mar 25, 2010 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

The problem is

Not everyone believes that this particular starter sucks. Or at least doesn’t suck when he’s healthy and by all accounts Cooper played through some injuries that could keep other guys out because the Chargers needed him as a player and a leader.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 26, 2010 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

He's not what he used to be

But I’m all for letting him keep the job until he loses it.

We’re going to need him in Indy this year.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Mar 26, 2010 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not everyone believed Wilfhelm sucked either

I seem to remember Siler taking Coops job last year. Seriously, did that really happen or am I remembering it wrong.

by Foilhat on Mar 26, 2010 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're remembering it wrong

We had this discussion before.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 26, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I remember you making the same claim before

And someone pointed out that Siler moved into Cooper’s old position and Cooper went to the other ILB spot. Then Siler would come out on passing downs for Burnett.

Cooper called the plays for the linebackers and wore the helmet with radio in it. It would have required some extra work to get someone new to call the plays and get them a new helmet and that never happened.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 26, 2010 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wasnt making any claim

I was trying to remember exactly what happened. So Coop slid over to Will and then Siler came out in nickel. Hmm

So I guess on a technicality he did lose his starting job, but took someone else’s. Well I guess if he’s a starter and a 3 down player, even a mediocre one we wont cut him. I wouldnt have excepted the team to switch the green dot mid season.

If I was him Id be working on covering kicks though, he’s 31 and is making significant money.

by Foilhat on Mar 26, 2010 3:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

you can’t pull the tender if he signs it… which he can do at any time (but hasn’t yet).

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Mar 24, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cooper, Dobbins and Burnet are all FA next year

and I don’t really see the Chargers re-signing any of them, so it may not be a bad idea to use a mid round pick on a ILB this year.

by Grey Suit on Mar 25, 2010 7:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

in the practice squad hopper

we have Holt and Beckwith (I think Holt plays ILB), so we do have some prospects.

And I think either Dobbins or Burnett will be back, both will be 28-ish next year at this time. But there probably will be some other young ones in the mix.

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Mar 25, 2010 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

3rd defensively in passes over twenty yards

is mis-leading. 1) because our rush defense was not very good; giving up nearly 170 ypg with a 4.3 avg per attempt and 2) we played so far back in our zones sometimes that all the offensive player had to do was throw the ball underneath us – its not like we were forcing teams into 3rd and long situations.

But both these support your argument that we need to address our front 7, possibly more specifically our DL. I am not refuting that. But what I will say is that our DB’s are no-where, absolutely NO-WHERE, near as good as the stats would imply.

Oh and playing the nickel back position is no harder than playing any of the starting DB spots. Very rarely are you gonna be placed on a island (or even just matched up) against the WRs like Brandon Marshall, Randy Moss, Andre Johnson, Reggie Wayne, Steve Smith and Larry Fitzgerald. Althought there are some exceptions at the slot receiver spot like Wes Welker.

by MacDeezul on Mar 24, 2010 4:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

My 2010 Fantasy mock draft

Key positions to address: RB, NT, DE, OL, DB

OK so looking at our draft position and considering the amount of draft picks that we’ve acquired recently, we are in a strong running to draft starters in at least 2 maybe 3 of those needed positions. I really feel like we are going to get Ryan Matthews with that first pick, b/c he is the most balanced of all the RBs available, and would compliment Sproles (if we still retain him) best. I like Jahvid Best, and we can trade up for CJ Spiller but it doesnt make much sense to when you have other positional needs. If AJ’s really high on Dan Williams than I don’t mind him trading up but that means that you run out of bartering room in the later rounds. Mount Cody is quickly dispelling doubters of his work ethic coming in “light” (has that word ever been used to describe Cody??) at 348 relative to the 379 earlier this summer, and steadily climbing the draft board. Hard to deny that his size is unavoidable, especially when the guy that manned that same position for the past 9-10 years was just as big. If you figure that both Cody and Matthews are rising in draft stock, you have to feel that a chance is going to be taken at some point and knowing AJ, if he sees a guy he likes, he’s gonna make a move for them (ala Eric Weddle).

Speaking of “Who are We” I bet a lot of Bolt fanatics would love to be back in the ‘06-’07 season when our defense was at the top of the class. I don’t think we are far off, just need a few key players and it starts in the trenches. Back in ‘07, the front three looked like this: Castillo, J-Will, and Olshansky — BIIIGG SCARY DUDES. Olshansky is the key here, losing him paired with injuries/suspensions to merriman made our entire D suffer because we couldn’t provide the one key element to any good defense, Pressure. As good as our depth is at the DE spot, I think you still need another BIG SCARY DUDE like Tyson AluAlu, that just wreaks havoc. Swapping 2nd rd. picks w/ Seattle allows you to make this all possible. Best possible scenario, Matthews falls into our lap without us having to move up, Mount Cody falls past the first round is still available at our 40th pick, and we pair our recently acquired picks with a current year 3rd rounder to move up to the mid 2nd rd to get “King Tyce!” as the entire PAC-10 knows him. If that doesn’t pull through, I wouldnt mind drafting AluAlu at the 40 spot and trading up to get Cam Thomas, another NT prospect who preseason last year, was much better than Dan Williams.
It comes plain and simple, we have good rotational players at the DL but no impact players. It is difficult to make plays with the rest of the defense when you don’t get any pressure and can’t force the opposing Qbs timing off. If you couple that, move better disciplined players like Antone Cason to man up opposite Jammer and open up roster spots so that people can play in their natural position, you will see drastic improvement. I like that Gregory is out of the Safety spot and playing nickel, something he is adept to, but more importantly, that Ellison is getting more minutes b/c he can be that intimidator in the 3rd tier of that defense. The entire defensive package then becomes big and a lot to handle.
A lot of people would like to see an OL get picked up, but i think u can get value much like AJ did with Vasquez in the 3rd rd. NiCk Hardwick was hurt for most of the year so not having that impact player/leader created inconsistency in the running game. I feel like tolbert and hester are going to grow as blockers and as offensive contributors (running and catching out of the back field) making it easier for a guy like Matthews. Do I really have to mention our passing attack? Not enough credit is given to AJ Smith who is a master talent evaluator and a maestro at arranging an intimidating team through the draft. Who are we u ask? We are More than the league can handle…

by JohnnyBoto on Mar 23, 2010 10:04 AM PDT reply actions  

7. OL

If we’re talking potential, Vazquez could be potentially great as well. Couldn’t he?

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 23, 2010 10:18 AM PDT reply actions  

Absolutely

"When they come for me I'll be sitting at my desk, with a gun in my hand wearing a bullet-proof vest, singing 'My, my, my, how the time does fly when you know you're going to die by the end of the night.'" - Catch 22

by John Gennaro on Mar 23, 2010 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am all for standardizing all our crazy name varients.

Antonio, Antwan, Antione = Anthony
Shawne, Shuan = Shawn

There, that should clear up some things around here.

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Mar 23, 2010 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

also

I think we should force Philip Rivers and Shawn Phillips to standardize the number of Ls in their names. In these trying economic times I say we go with one L to save on letter embroidery costs.

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Mar 24, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

pfft

That savings would go right into the Spanos’ pockets and you’re robbing that embroiderer of his money. You sicken me fat cat lover.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 24, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Sean?

"When they come for me I'll be sitting at my desk, with a gun in my hand wearing a bullet-proof vest, singing 'My, my, my, how the time does fly when you know you're going to die by the end of the night.'" - Catch 22

by John Gennaro on Mar 23, 2010 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Xian

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Mar 23, 2010 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I knew a guy in middle school

Who spelled it C’ian.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 23, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Chone

"When they come for me I'll be sitting at my desk, with a gun in my hand wearing a bullet-proof vest, singing 'My, my, my, how the time does fly when you know you're going to die by the end of the night.'" - Catch 22

by John Gennaro on Mar 24, 2010 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Scifres, Kaeding and Binn

give this article the collective finger.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 23, 2010 10:20 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

haha thats funny!! but i think overall i would have to put them around 3 or 4… maybe… unless your talkin postseason then i dunno

by D-richman on Mar 23, 2010 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Positions ranked too high

DL, LB & WR.

Positions ranked too low, TE, OL & DB.

by JeromeB on Mar 23, 2010 12:24 PM PDT reply actions  

DL

needs to be at the near bottom of the list. we got steamrolled last year.

i would say:
QB, WR, TE, DB, ST, OL (Pass protection), ILB, OLB, OL (Run), RB, DL

Gary Potter: Harness in the good energy, block out the bad. Harness. Energy. Block. Bad. It's like a carousel. You put the quarter in, you get on the horse, it goes up and down, and around. Circular, circle. Feel it. Go with the flow.
Happy Gilmore: Psycho.

by tonik on Mar 23, 2010 12:33 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

THIS!!

Nailed it! Like a 125 yard wedge shot to within 6 inches of the cup.

by Andy (allfield) on Mar 23, 2010 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would actually make a couple slight changes to that

QB, WR, TE, ST, OL Pass prot., ILB, OLB, DB, OL Run, DL, RB

by SoCalBoltFan on Mar 23, 2010 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with Tonik

I agree with Tonik on the bottom 2…I know everyone predicts Chargers moving up for rb, I just think they are far more concerned with DL.. Macdeezul had a couple things I agree with, you can’t have your safety making the most tackles. Now ILB rotation probably plays a role there, but still our opponents were consistently putting us on our heels. The makeshift line was ok, but interceptions are not going to happen unless we get serious consistent pressure. Linebackers are not going to cause pressure they can unless our opponents line is being tied up on their heels; never happened most of the year….

so my 2 cents will be a DL in the first 2 picks.

Rb maybe yes maybe no….I could easily see AJ waiting till the 3rd for rb, we simply don’t use a back in the same as we used to. We might get one in the first 2, but I could easily see Gerhardt or Tate in the 3rd

by bo_shilo on Mar 23, 2010 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

"we simply don’t use a back in the same as we used to"

The way I’ve heard A.J. talk about it, he’s not exactly happy that we can’t use our running game with more effectiveness. Everyone else may call us a passing team, but A.J. wants a balanced team.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 24, 2010 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

True

I agree more with you and AJ than Norv; but Norv is the one that calls the plays. Which I also dislike; if you want to be a coordinator stay a coordinator. The mental aspect of the game is enough which wasn’t good enough for the Jets game in my nose bleed section opinion…

but I digress, when I look back to last year, offense doesn;t stress me like looking at our defense. Other than the Dallas game I just never saw a full 60 minutes of I know the ‘D’ has the game in the bag feeling

by bo_shilo on Mar 24, 2010 1:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Week 7 vs Kansas City was the defense’s most dominant performance.

Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Mar 24, 2010 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nah

The Xmas game was imo

by Foilhat on Mar 24, 2010 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

That was more impressive because the Titans are good, but they absolutely smashed the Chiefs in week 7.

Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Mar 24, 2010 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Was Chief game is a reflection of the Chief’s offense or our defense. The Tennessee game was a great game, in terms of defensive effort Chris Johnson seemed to like it.

Our defense seems to have the goal of lets keep their offense under control till our offense gets it going…which not a horrible philosophy.
What I am talking about is the swagger of walking out there with your unit and saying to one another they are going to be our b—— today. We have a passable defense; but not one that can set the tone of the game. A game against a playoff caliber team.

by bo_shilo on Mar 24, 2010 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Props to QuesaDiaz

The logo looks even cooler than I though it would

by Foilhat on Mar 24, 2010 9:57 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Toby Gerhardt

We should definitely consider drafting him. He’s a physical, grind-it-out running back who’s also extremely fast, and he’d be a good complement to the more finesse Sproles.

Clippers // Chargers // Rays // Panthers // Gators // Boise State

by 82-0 on Mar 26, 2010 6:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


BFTB Apparel Store

Bftbshirtstore_medium

Facebook

Chargers on Twitter


Managers

Paddlin_small John Gennaro

Assistant Editors

Dont-panic-thumb_small Wonko

Pomeranian_of_war_small Richard Wade

Antonio_small creanium

Columnists

Sdclogo2_small Orz

Tn_small Jeff (sliderockmpc)

Wrong_small_small Superduperboltman

Screen_shot_2011-08-05_at_2 jkvandal