Why Did the Chargers Let Drew Brees Go?
I am shocked at the number of people that have contacted me asking how the Chargers could've let Drew Brees go. It was not a bad decision. It was not a dumb decision. While the most staunch Drew Brees fans will say that the Chargers shouldn't have drafted Philip Rivers when they did (I humbly disagree), those same fans will agree that the team made the right move in letting Drew Brees go to New Orleans after the 2005 season. I'm going to explain why.
I have told this story so many times that you would think I was doing Brees' biography at this point. However, there are a few people that somehow have managed to not hear it and I feel like it's my duty to let them know that the Chargers did not make some catastrophic mistake by letting Drew go.
In the last game of the 2005 season, Drew Brees should not have been playing. The team was 9-6, but had no shot of making the playoffs by time the game started. However, A.J. Smith and Marty Schottenheimer had already started a war that would eventually lead to Marty's departure from San Diego, and a big part of that war was at the Quarterback position.
In his rookie season, Philip Rivers (although he was seen as the future franchise QB) was named the third QB on the Chargers roster behind Doug Flutie. It was seen as punishment for Rivers holding out and missing part of Training Camp. At the end of the season, in a game that was meaningless because the Chargers had already locked up their spot the postseason, the coach decided to start Flutie (the veteran with loads of experience) over Rivers (the kid who was desperate for experience). It was becoming obvious that Marty not only didn't want to give in to his GM (who was pushing for Rivers as the future, even as Brees was succeeding), he did not want the fans to get excited about the 6'5" country-boy with a laser arm that was sitting on the bench. He finally relented in the second half, and the rookie went 5-for-8 and threw a TD to unknown rookie WR Malcom Floyd.
The following year, Rivers moved up the depth chart to backup QB and was seen as such by the Head Coach. To Marty, this was not a young QB that was going to get snaps and eventually take over the reigns. Brees was his guy and he'd be damned if he was going to let the GM thrust the young QB into the lineup. Marty's stubbornness was never more evident then in Week 17 of the 2005 season.
The Chargers were in a situation similar to the one they were one year prior. The last game of the regular season was completely meaningless to them. However, this time it was meaningless because their 9-6 record had made them the odd-team-out heading into the playoffs. They would be watching postseason football at home, and all that was left to do was give the rookie QB his first start so that he could get a few snaps under his belt. Right? Wrong. Marty was not going to give Philip a chance to come out and look great against the AFC West Champion Broncos because Denver had very little to play for. Instead, Schottenheimer made possibly the most stubborn move of his career and decided to start Drew Brees in a meaningless game so that the fans couldn't fawn over their young, prototype QB.
It was this silly move that led us up to the crossroads of this story. Standing on his own goal-line in the first half, Drew Brees was sacked by a blitzing John Lynch. He fumbled the ball when he was hit, and when he dove back on top of it he was crushed by Gerard Warren in a way that made your shoulder hurt just watching it. Brees left the game in obvious pain and handed the team over to Philip Rivers.
Break
The story doesn't end here, but we need to pause to analyze. Is there any other coach in the league that would put his starting QB, who had made the Pro Bowl (as an alternate) in 2005 by the way, out there in a meaningless game against a division rival? Of course not. Especially not when there was a young kid on the sidelines that was chomping at the bit to get on the field. This was a entirely selfish act by Marty Schottenheimer and it nearly cost Drew Brees his career.
Making the act more selfish was that this Pro Bowl QB was playing the last game of his rookie contract. If he doesn't play that game, he is assured a long-term, big-money contract in San Diego (they would've traded Rivers) or elsewhere. He would've finally become the cornerstone of a franchise and no longer would've had to worry about losing his starting spot after a bad game. In a nutshell: his life and career are set if he does not play that game. Yet there he was, lying on the field crying out in pain because of a petty fight between two grown men that were using these athletes like toys in their silly game. His career is maybe over because he respected his coach enough to not say no when he knew he probably should've.
Marty lost nothing when Brees went down. He moved on to the young QB and arguably had his best season as a head coach (in the regular season, anyways). Marty risked nothing by putting Brees in there. He did it to try to make a point to the GM and the fans, and all he did was make himself look like a stubborn old fool.
Break Over
Now we're going to get into the severity of Brees' shoulder injury. Any injury to the throwing arm/shoulder of an NFL QB is going to have teams worried. This was a poorly-timed injury (right after Chad Pennington's career starting spiraling downwards after a shoulder injury) to a free agent QB that wanted to be guaranteed a starting spot and starter's money. Oh, and it wasn't just any old shoulder injury (emphasis is mine):
More than 1,700 miles away in Birmingham, renowned orthopedic surgeon Dr. James Andrews watched a replay of Brees going down. "I thought, my God, what an injury," says Andrews. Four days later he examined Brees and diagnosed a rare 360-degree tear of the labrum, the ring of cartilage around the entry to the shoulder joint. During surgery Andrews discovered a deep, partial rotator cuff tear. He says the damage in Brees's shoulder joint represented "one of the most unique injuries of any athlete I've ever treated."
Andrews and two other surgeons mended the labrum with the unheard-of total of 11 surgical anchors (three or four is common) and also repaired the rotator cuff. The 90-minute procedure was performed arthroscopically--a godsend for Brees. If the doctors had had to cut through shoulder tissue, his recovery would have been prolonged by months.
Still, Brees faced an arduous rehabilitation, with long odds. "Lord, I was just hoping to give him a functional shoulder," says Andrews. "An average athlete would not recover from this injury."
James Andrew handed Brees off to Kevin Wilk, a physical therapist and clinical director at Benchmark-Champion Sports Medicine in Birmingham who has been rehabbing Andrew's patients for 18 years. "Dr. Andrews told me, 'You've got your work cut out for you,'" Wilk says. "I had never seen an injury this severe in any elite-level throwing athlete. We were in uncharted waters."
So now you're starting to see what A.J. Smith was seeing. Contrary to what some people may think, this was not a decision that was made simply because Smith wanted to bring in "his guy". The Chargers GM did his due diligence, checking with specialists (including Dr. Andrew himself) to see what the future could hold for Drew. While some doctors were very optimistic about his chances of regaining his full strength in the shoulder, many of the doctors Smith talked to gave Brees about a 25% chance of regaining full strength (which he needed, since he didn't have a lot of arm strength to spare).
Knowing that he was already paying Rivers starters' money, and with the knowledge that Brees may never again be able to be a starter in the NFL, A.J. Smith did what anybody would do. He offered Brees an incentive-laden contract that only offered about $2 million guaranteed per season (backup QB money) and told him that Philip Rivers would be back too. Basically, Smith took one look at Brees' shoulder and decided to not put all of his eggs in that one (injured) basket.
Obviously, I am not insider and wasn't even a blogger at the time this happened. I don't know exact specifics, but what is known is that Brees was offered contracts by only three teams: the Chargers, the Dolphins and the Saints. The Dolphins were coming off of a 9-7 season and were looking to upgrade from Gus Frerotte. Their coach, Nick Saban, had just finished coaching his first season and was looking like the genius he was expected to be. The Saints were coming off of a 3-13 season (that included dealing with Hurricane Katrina) and had just signed first-time Head Coach Sean Payton (and they were not Coach Payton's first choice).
Number one on Brees' priorities was being a starter. He did not want to be signed as a backup somewhere, because he was worried he'd never get a chance. Miami would not guarantee him the starter's spot, and (supposedly) barely offered him more money than the Chargers did. It seemed the Dolphins strategy for the 2006 season was to sign a bunch of these risk players that had/have potential and see who emerges. Their starters for the season ended up being Joey Harrington, Daunte Culpepper and Cleo Lemon.
Supposedly, the New Orleans Saints offered the same contract the Dolphins did. It was still not starter's money, but new coach Sean Payton was willing to guarantee Brees the starting spot if the QB could get healthy in time for Training Camp. All it took for Brees was one trip to the devastated city to see that, if he were to regain his past form, he could make a big difference in building this city back up to it's previous heights. He decided to sign with the Saints, got himself healthy by Training Camp and the rest is history. He led that Saints team to a 10-6 record in his first year, and led them to their first Super Bowl in his fourth year.
Do you get it now? Can I finally stop telling this story over and over? The Dolphins and Saints, both desperate for QBs, essentially offered Drew Brees (a Pro Bowler the season before) backup QB money. That's how risky his shoulder was. The Chargers were lucky enough to already have a backup plan in place, so that when he turned down their (very fair) offer the franchise was not hurt.
A.J. Smith deserves no criticism for Brees being in New Orleans. If you want to criticize, you should blame the stubborn coach who had Drew in the game for selfish reasons. A.J. Smith and the Chargers deserve credit for having a backup plan just in case Brees were to get injured or leave at the end of his contract (or do both). It was not a mistake, it was a success.
Luckily for Drew and anyone with a heart, it was a success for everyone involved. Philip Rivers got his chance to shine and has become one of the league's best QBs. Pairing him with Norv Turner is almost as good of a match as pairing Drew Brees with Sean Payton. The city of San Diego continues to watch their team have success and play postseason football annually, and the city of New Orleans got to forget about their troubles for a few weeks while the Saints took them on a ride to the Championship.
8 recs |
129 comments
|
Comments
It bothers me that this story is even necessary.
Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
it kind of reminds me of that movie "You've got mail"...I'm Tom Hanks he's Meg Ryan -- Padres prospect Matt Antonelli on sdsuaztec4
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Feb 8, 2010 2:25 PM PST reply actions
Apparently it is...
I’ve had half a dozen people at work who don’t watch football ask me why we “traded” Brees. Never mind the 3 or 4 revisionist historians who insist that we should have kept Brees even with the shoulder injury.
If there is a God, or any justice at all, Philip Rivers will win multiple Super Bowls and end this nonsense once and for all.
"As a confirmed melancholic, I can testify that the best and maybe only antidote for melancholia is *action*. However, like most melancholics, I suffer also from sloth." - Edward Abbey.
by Jeff (sliderockmpc) on Feb 8, 2010 2:32 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm in a gordie mood

Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
it kind of reminds me of that movie "You've got mail"...I'm Tom Hanks he's Meg Ryan -- Padres prospect Matt Antonelli on sdsuaztec4
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Feb 8, 2010 2:52 PM PST up reply actions
Shouldn’t that picture be five times the size it is?
Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Feb 8, 2010 2:53 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm sorry, Metallica only had three albums.
Some guys who didn’t include Cliff Burton did some good stuff after that.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Feb 8, 2010 5:54 PM PST up reply actions
But Metallica died in 1986.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Feb 8, 2010 5:55 PM PST up reply actions
It's totally necessary
You’re going to have a mix of fans that were either in their teenage years when this occurred, weren’t following the Chargers as closely back then or just plain misremember the details of the time. Combine that with the fact that most people on the internet are either too lazy, busy or just don’t know how to find information on the internet and you get a whole bunch of people that don’t know the entire story.
Due to the current state of events (Brees winning a Super Bowl) and thus increasing the interest of San Diego fans in his story it becomes very necessary to rehash the facts. I’ve said a similar thing about the Schottenheimer story. Both should be posts that get linked in the “Featured Stories” section on the home page. History is important. Mostly because every tends to forget it.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
by Wonko on Feb 8, 2010 3:10 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
*
History is important. Mostly because everybody tends to forget it.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Also because it tends to repeat itself
Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
it kind of reminds me of that movie "You've got mail"...I'm Tom Hanks he's Meg Ryan -- Padres prospect Matt Antonelli on sdsuaztec4
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Feb 8, 2010 3:17 PM PST up reply actions
Awesome story
I’ll never understand how people can even comment on the whole situation on why Drew was let go, it’s obvious why the thing went down the way it did.
I just want to get paid to draw naked girls, is that so much to ask?
Like Jeff said.
Everyone thinks the Chargers traded Breezer. I’ve had that asked of me as well.
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Feb 8, 2010 2:46 PM PST up reply actions
This is nothing.
On 1090 today, all the callers I heard couldn’t stop talking about how they wished we had a “real” coach like Sean Payton, how he’s a “leader” who “takes gambles”.
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Feb 8, 2010 2:56 PM PST up reply actions
You thought it was bad earlier
Hacksaw is stirring the pot with nice heaping cups of B.S. Ugh.
"As a confirmed melancholic, I can testify that the best and maybe only antidote for melancholia is *action*. However, like most melancholics, I suffer also from sloth." - Edward Abbey.
by Jeff (sliderockmpc) on Feb 8, 2010 3:03 PM PST up reply actions
Heh.
Last time I listened to Hacksaw he was making up crap about the team going to Las Vegas the night before the playoff game.
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Feb 8, 2010 3:17 PM PST up reply actions
Talk about holding a grudge
Nothing better than a guy with a microphone and an axe to grind.
"As a confirmed melancholic, I can testify that the best and maybe only antidote for melancholia is *action*. However, like most melancholics, I suffer also from sloth." - Edward Abbey.
by Jeff (sliderockmpc) on Feb 8, 2010 3:21 PM PST up reply actions
I used to find him midly entertaining.
Now I listen to music instead. Darren Smith is the only guy I listen to on that station anymore. The only one with a modicum of intelligence.
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Feb 8, 2010 3:25 PM PST up reply actions
1090 must be pathetic now then
If Darren Smith is the best thing on that station, then how does the STATION even stay on the air: Darren Smith says the same thing over and over and over again because he has so little to say, and while occasionally he has a good point to make, mostly he’s either stating the obvious or wrong (mostly stating the obvious). More than just a few posters here have infinitely more insight than Darren Smith.
I’d encourage you to stick with the music and maybe even increase the frequency with which you listen to it!
I don’t listen to sports talk much any more at all, but if Kenterra (spelling?) is still on the air, he’s got more intelligence than Darren Smith, at least when it comes to baseball…. They may be equally mediocre when it comes to football, I don’t know….
Darrin Smith's interviews
Are some of the best you can hear.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
^This. He has great interviews.
Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Feb 12, 2010 2:15 PM PST up reply actions
Payton is a pretty good coach.
Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
That's fine.
What I don’t like is this attitude that Norv is holding back the team. He isn’t.
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Feb 8, 2010 3:37 PM PST up reply actions
That's because his first coaching job was at SDSU
Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
it kind of reminds me of that movie "You've got mail"...I'm Tom Hanks he's Meg Ryan -- Padres prospect Matt Antonelli on sdsuaztec4
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Feb 8, 2010 4:44 PM PST up reply actions
anyone know what's with the kid's earphones?
I suspected they were noise cancellers, but I did see Drew talking to the kid while the kid was still was wearing them… Perhaps they tied into the coach’s headset so the little guy knew what was coming.
by Stephen (shaynes41) on Feb 8, 2010 3:13 PM PST reply actions
Beats by Dre
Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
it kind of reminds me of that movie "You've got mail"...I'm Tom Hanks he's Meg Ryan -- Padres prospect Matt Antonelli on sdsuaztec4
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Feb 8, 2010 3:18 PM PST up reply actions
I have to beg 2 differ
With a couple of notes that I think bias the article. First of all, Flutie started in the last game of 2004, because it was his “swan song” and everybody knew it in San Diego. It was not the vindictive coach, who did put in Rivers in the second half.
Secondly, it still comes down to why use the #1 overall draft choice earlier, to draft a quarterback, unless you had no faith at all in what you have. And I mean, no faith. With LT in his prime, a serviceable-good (as far as we knew) QB, a cornerstone player or two added may have put the Chargers over the top years earlier.
That is the crux of the gripe, by the detractors to your article. AJ used to that draft choice on a quarterback. Everyone knew we needed DL, and safety help. Instead of picking up perhaps a monster DL, we get Igor into 2nd round, a big drop off.
by SumBuddy Else on Feb 8, 2010 4:18 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
What, you wanted them to draft Tommie Harris?
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Feb 8, 2010 4:39 PM PST up reply actions
I'm not sure he's worth the first overall pick.
Or even the 4th.
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Feb 8, 2010 4:43 PM PST up reply actions
i have read this blog for a long time and had been thinking of joining and responding to this post is the perfect place to start
I have heard the same things from a lot of people who know I am a chargers fan, but here is reason we drafted a QB:
Drew Brees 356 205 2108 57.6 5.9 11 3.1 15 4.2 68 21 178 67.5
a QB rating of 67!!!! do you realize how bad that is? that is the equivalent of Brady Quinn’s year this year.
by sdbolts on Feb 8, 2010 4:44 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Drew Brees was f*cking terrible when he made the pick.
Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
it kind of reminds me of that movie "You've got mail"...I'm Tom Hanks he's Meg Ryan -- Padres prospect Matt Antonelli on sdsuaztec4
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Feb 8, 2010 4:45 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
I believed it
And no one laughed at me.
I told people that picking a QB in that draft was stupid. No one laughed at me.
I do remember me and others laughing at the thought that we “needed” to draft a QB.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
I think that you explained
the Rivers – Brees part very clearly for people who are not “real” Charger fans. But I think you were a little hard on Marty.
If you're GM or Head Coach...
Are you going to stake your future employment on a QB who had:
Posted a 10-17 record as a starter.
Had thrown 29 TDs against 31 INTs.
Completed 59.4 % of his passes.
Tanked down the stretch in his first year as a starter – partially costing a division title or playoff spot (our awful defense late in 2002 also had much to do with it).
Regressed from his 2nd year to his 3rd year.
Been benched in his 3rd year in favor of a 39-40 year old QB.
No, I don’t think you would, and I wouldn’t have either.
"As a confirmed melancholic, I can testify that the best and maybe only antidote for melancholia is *action*. However, like most melancholics, I suffer also from sloth." - Edward Abbey.
by Jeff (sliderockmpc) on Feb 8, 2010 6:34 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
Aren't those Eli Manning's career stats?
Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
it kind of reminds me of that movie "You've got mail"...I'm Tom Hanks he's Meg Ryan -- Padres prospect Matt Antonelli on sdsuaztec4
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Feb 8, 2010 7:43 PM PST up reply actions
What, would you take Manning over Rivers?
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Feb 8, 2010 11:52 PM PST up reply actions
No
Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
it kind of reminds me of that movie "You've got mail"...I'm Tom Hanks he's Meg Ryan -- Padres prospect Matt Antonelli on sdsuaztec4
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Feb 9, 2010 8:21 AM PST up reply actions
But... but...
He won a Super Bowl!
Yup, I'm the nut who believes Mark Loretta is a possible future Hall of Famer.
by StrangeBroP25 on Feb 9, 2010 7:37 PM PST up reply actions
wonder what Rivers Stats would have been
if he had to start almost right away,
Here's what I'm interested to know, since we've moved on to discussing the decision to draft a new QB in 2004.
Let’s say they don’t give up on Brees, and decide he’s the guy going forward. Who do they draft first overall instead? Trading down is likely impossible—your only trading partner is the Giants, and if you trade with them you get a QB, what we don’t want in this scenario.
Robert Gallery? Perhaps he would have developed differently/better in San Diego instead of Oakland. Larry Fitzgerald? I guess that would have been nice. Sean Taylor? Also good, but you only get three years of him.
So the question you have to ask is, was Larry Fitzgerald, Roberty Gallery, or Sean Taylor worth Nate Kaeding and Shawne Merriman (and Roman Oben)? Tough call. The best argument I can come up with is Wonko’s—having one of those players instead of Rivers/Kaeding may have made the difference in the playoff game vs. the Jets. But on the flip side, Kaeding and Merriman have helped win a lot of games for the Chargers the last few years. Would they win all those with an extra wide receiver/offensive lineman/defensive back instead? Maybe. Again, tough call.
In the end it’s probably a wash, because we don’t know if those players would have made any sort of difference, and any difference they did make would have to be weighed against the differences made by Merriman and Kaeding.
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Feb 8, 2010 6:42 PM PST reply actions
Your making assumptions that aren't necessarily true.
Like shaun Taylor still would have got shot, the CHargers could have also asked the Giants to pick someone else and then trade. The Giants only picked Rivers because that was who AJ wanted.
The Problem:
AJ can’t see beyond the physical aspect of a player……….look at the current crop of players on the team now who currently have no regard for the law. Apparently there is something to the chemistry argument. Good guys do win! Congrats Brees!
RT
I think the the Charger’s ability to win a championship came and went with Butler…….He seemed to draft with a long term vision, not with the short-sighted viewpoint AJ has. The drafting of PR seemed to be just a case of AJ wanting to make his MARK on the team, and not getting solid people around Brees…….I feel we should have kept Marty and let AJ go, Of course we didn’t learn that the first time around when Bobby Bethard was kept on instead of Bobby Ross.
Yes
and it was AJ who forced Brees in that game to injury his shoulder so that Philip could get the starting spot. It’s all going according to plan….
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Feb 9, 2010 2:25 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Rec i understand every word, and it should never be forgotten.
AJ made a decision it’s over, i’m past it. but no matter how many stats we bring up, or how many facts we bring forth to tell the story, there is only one stat that matters…
Drew Brees is a SUPER BOWL CHAMPION!
Phillip Rivers “IS NOT”
stick that in your sheet.
peace out
The peanut gallery has spoken!!!
by gatesoftds on Feb 8, 2010 8:06 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
That is such a silly argument.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
by Wonko on Feb 9, 2010 12:53 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
It's not even an argument.
Oh internet, what a wicked web you weave.
by Mad_Villain on Feb 9, 2010 1:04 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Rec’d.
Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
Yeah!
Trent Dilfer is a SUPER BOWL CHAMPION!
Dan Marino "IS NOT"
by Steve (Grey Suit) on Feb 9, 2010 2:03 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs
Oh my effing GOD!
Butler… beyond Tomlinson, Brees, Jammer, and Ben Leber, give me one other player Butler drafted or signed as an undrafted FA who has made a difference for this organization or anywhere else beyond 2005? Furthermore, remember the $$$ wasted on Marcellus Wiley, Wade Richey, Alex Molden, and David Boston in FA?
As for Marty… yes I want a coach who commits a personal foul penalty and sits on the ball in OT when the opposing defense has been on the field for the last 9 minutes of game time.
I want a coach who goes for a 4th-and-11 on the opponents’ 30 yard line early in a scoreless game, a coach who burns timeouts following an opponent’s injury timeout, or challenging a play that clearly could not be overturned.
Those were playoff gaffes. Norv hasn’t made a single mistake in the postseason that rivals those errors.
"As a confirmed melancholic, I can testify that the best and maybe only antidote for melancholia is *action*. However, like most melancholics, I suffer also from sloth." - Edward Abbey.
by Jeff (sliderockmpc) on Feb 8, 2010 8:10 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
Seriously
Butler had less time as Gm (01-03) than AJ has, and if Butler had stayed alive I believe we would be better off than we are now with AJ’s selections.
Did Xenu tell you that?
Yup, I'm the nut who believes Mark Loretta is a possible future Hall of Famer.
by StrangeBroP25 on Feb 8, 2010 9:40 PM PST up reply actions
Please support your arguments.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
Uh, that one’s as unsupportable as it is unassailable.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Feb 9, 2010 7:24 AM PST up reply actions
butler drafted
THe greatest chargers player ever. One of the top qb’s and a shutdown corner in Jammer. WHo have all been good more than just one or two years. WHat’s AJ done in more time?Butler only had 2 drafts
Not sure who was behind the ’03 draft but that was a horrible draft except for scifres.
What are the oddsof the Chargers winning a Superbowl if we still had Brees w/ the Defense we have?
im just curious what ya’ll think of that. Anyways, Im happy for Brees. Im glad he got that 2nd chance to prove he still can play. To think, if LT left n ended up on the Saints last year n he won a SuperBowl I’d be happy for him to … but eh then again thats me. I love Philip Rivers! He’s a really good qb. I hope this inspires him to play n prove that the Chargers didnt make a mistake with all this talk.
"It dont matter if you win or lose your still a loser... said the Chargers Fan"
by ChargersWitch on Feb 8, 2010 8:15 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Same as the odds of the Chargers winning it with Rivers?
It’s apples/oranges at this point. They’re completely different offenses. Rivers is in a play-action/deep passing offense because that fits his skillset and Norv’s play-calling. Brees is in a short-passing/reversing offense because that fits his skillset and Payton’s play-calling. Put one in the other offense and they don’t have as much success.
Still, I think they’re just about as good as each other.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
I agree but the saints just have a better D over all than ours...
"It dont matter if you win or lose your still a loser... said the Chargers Fan"
by ChargersWitch on Feb 9, 2010 8:58 AM PST up reply actions
Phillip Rivers is a better QB
Brees is a winner.
Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a baseball; inside of a dog, it is very dark.
--Groucho Marx.
Winner = plays on a better team
Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Feb 8, 2010 9:49 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Nice Article, First Post For Me
Thankfully, I haven’t been as inundated with questions about Brees and the Chargers as I expected. Mostly because most of the people I interact with are pretty knowledgeable about football and have been in town long enough to remember Brees’ tenure here. However, occasionally I run into the odd person out of town who asks about it and the easiest way I basically put it is this:
When Brees was a Charger, he wasn’t really that good so we drafted Rivers. After that, Brees got kinda good but then majorly f—ked up his shoulder, forcing us to release him and go with Rivers. Thus far, I think it’s been cool for everyone. River’s numbers are very close to Brees, but is bigger, stronger and younger. Brees matured and developed from his difficulty here, Payton’s coaching and Katrina – he revitalized and became the face one of the league’s worst franchises.
I’m really happy with Rivers since he and Norv not only have developed well together, but he still has such massive upside and potential for someone so young. And I’m really happy for Brees, because of the way he’s grown from all the adversity he and New Orleans experienced and how he’s become a player he really could never have been had he stayed here in San Diego with the coaching staff he previously had in place.
And that’s pretty much it. And before more people go about lamenting Brees’ departure from the Chargers, please remember that nothing exists in a vaccum. He doesn’t do everything himself and his Super Bowl victory, heck even his appearance in that game came from fantastic play by the other members of his team. Brees was totally ineffective in the second half of the NFC Championship game and despite his defense supplying 5 turnovers they needed to go to OT to win a game they had every reason that they should have lost. In the Super Bowl, Brees was pretty much nowhere to be found in the first half and his defense did a fantastic job of nutting up and frustrating the Colts offense after a shaky start.
by DoubleViking on Feb 8, 2010 8:27 PM PST reply actions 3 recs
Welcome and great first post!
Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
it kind of reminds me of that movie "You've got mail"...I'm Tom Hanks he's Meg Ryan -- Padres prospect Matt Antonelli on sdsuaztec4
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Feb 8, 2010 8:28 PM PST up reply actions
Rec'd
These new commenters are awesome. More please!
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
Drew Brees
First of all Drew didn’t start playing well until it was getting close to the end of his Rookie contract and the drafting of Rivers. Had Drew been working out like a mad-man like he has been then the Chargers wouldn’t had to draft a QB however, Brees was still a Questionable NFL guarterback…Hinesight is different. I love the firery nature of Brees but nobody knew when drafting a QB. Rivers is also a firery competitor and all. I am extremely happy for Drew and wish there coulda been a way for him to do that here in San Diego. NOW Only IF Rivers can lead these BOLTS to the promise land and get his multiple Super Bowl victories everyone will be happy.
One Last Thing About Quarterbacks
Within the past few weeks, I’ve generally encountered a lot of absurd commentery throughout the internet in regards to Peyton Manning, Brees and Rivers. Primarily how that while some consider Rivers to be elite, he just doesn’t seem to currently be in Manning’s and now Brees’ level of player.
And to that, I generally respond that… yes, obviously that is and should be true. Philip Rivers’ ability to win is remarkable and his numbers are very similar to Manning’s and Brees’ this year – and he was drafted in 2004. This is the first year he’s shown real flashes of becoming an amazing quarterback. Peyton Manning was drafted in 1998, six years before Rivers was even in the league. Brees was drafted in 2001, three years before Rivers and really it wasn’t until 2007 that he showed “elite” level of play. Even then, it wasn’t until this year’s Super Bowl run that he even got more playoff wins than Rivers.
Anyway, as I said above I’m really happy for Brees for the adversity he’s overcome, the player he’s become for a historically bad organization like the Saints and the figurehead he’s become for a city that has seen some bad times recently. Additonally, I’m really happy with Rivers, his accomplishments thus far and the strides and development he seems to be making every year.
by DoubleViking on Feb 8, 2010 8:53 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
Good Post
Obviousman. Some fans will never be truly satisified until we win that elusive trophy. But that’s why we love this game because there’s always next year.
Well, at least this year there is.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Feb 9, 2010 7:27 AM PST up reply actions
Jesus christ man, you really ripped apart Marty!
…lets at least give the man some respect. He did, after all, lead the Chargers to two of their greatest seasons in 2004 and 2006, helped LT win an MVP, and developed much of the core Chargers that are currently on the roster… and although it had to end in such a distasteful manner, he IS one of the greatest Charger coaches of all time. The Chargers would not be where they are right now without Marty.
And in his defense, im sure there was something more to the whole Drew Brees injury fiasco… i personally dont believe that any coach would use one of their players as a scapegoat for trying to prove a point.
Other then that, good writing as always.
I don't think it's ripping on him
it’s about one situation, not Marty-the-coach as a whole.
Oh internet, what a wicked web you weave.
Im just saying that the main point I got from this article was that Marty was the bad guy in this whole situation, was bad for the Chargers, and that he treated Drew like shit for his own selfish needs …this makes me believe that there must have been more to it because I CANNOT see any professional veteran coach acting this way.
by jordanmowbray on Feb 9, 2010 12:56 PM PST up reply actions
No so sure..
Marty is a great coach and he deserves respect, but he also made mistakes….There’s your exemple.
So if today’s Chargers are his making you are saying that Rivers was he’s guy??? A bit of a contradiction.
by frenchcharger on Feb 9, 2010 2:01 AM PST up reply actions
Didn't you??
You said that “The Chargers would not be where they are right now without Marty”
And we all know that “right now” they are Rivers’ team, and not thanks to Marty. Can’t have it both ways.
by frenchcharger on Feb 10, 2010 5:35 AM PST up reply actions
Funny verb, "to be"
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Feb 10, 2010 8:45 AM PST up reply actions
I wasnt referring to Rivers, i was referring more to the other players that he helped such as Tomlinson, Gates, Merriman, etc.
And dont forget, Rivers did have a very productive season under Marty… so Philip was more or less “his guy”. But I guess it depends on what you define “his guy” as. If you are referring to him being Marty’s starting quarterback, then yes he was… but if it refers to Philip being the team leader, like he is under Norv right now,, then no he wasnt because that was LT’s position… but it was only Philip’s full season and not many players become “the guy” after their first full season. So im not sure what you mean by that…
by jordanmowbray on Feb 10, 2010 4:30 PM PST up reply actions
I posed the question to Kevin Acee as to why Marty would’ve put Brees out there. His response was “He wanted the 10th win.” When I pointed out how insanely illogical that was, and what a huge risk he was taking with Brees’ career, he responded with “He was Marty.” So I suppose I’m wrong. Perhaps Marty just really wanted to beat the Broncos in a meaningless game and that, to him, was more important that developing the young QB. I just don’t know another coach in the league that’s going to risk his Pro Bowl QB, a free agent after the season, in a meaningless game just because he wants 10 wins instead of 9.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
Marty was just an ultra-competitive coach, and I believe thats why he played Drew instead of trying to spite A.J Smith, and ultimately the Chargers.
In Marty’s defense, Bilichick did play Pro-Bowl receiver Wes Welker this year in a meaningless game.. and he ended up getting a freak injury like Drew did.
by jordanmowbray on Feb 9, 2010 1:08 PM PST up reply actions
hmm, i wonder… and in his defense, Tony Dungy was also a playoff choker until he won the Superbowl. Who knows, maybe if we still had Marty the Chargers would have won by now? nobody will ever know.
You have to admit that the Chargers wouldn’t be where they are right now without years under Marty.
by jordanmowbray on Feb 9, 2010 1:01 PM PST up reply actions
And it took Cowher forever as well
The thing is, Marty had plenty of chances, with other teams, and he just couldn’t get it done in the playoffs. Not to mention Marty actually had plenty of “WTF?” moments in the playoffs (going for it on 4th and 11 on the Patriots 30 in the 1st quarter comes to mind).
5 playoff wins in 18 chances (for a 0.278 winning percentage) isn’t exactly stellar.
We are where we are now thanks to AJ Smith and Marty, yes. However, credit is due to Norv for continuing the success of this team and being able to at least have some playoff success. 3 divisional championships in your first three years as coach is a feat in itself. Not to mention a perfect 13-0 in December under Norv.
I firmly believe the Chargers are better off under Norv than they were under Marty. I’m in no way saying Norv is the greatest coach out there, but for the Chargers, he’s better than Marty.
by creanium on Feb 9, 2010 1:13 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Good response.
Im with you on everything there. It just seems to me that everyone has lost respect for Marty, when in fact he helped this Chargers franchise get to where it is right now. Norv is certainly a better fit for this team then Marty is.
by jordanmowbray on Feb 9, 2010 1:32 PM PST up reply actions
Marty was good for the Chargers, at that time
In 2007 when his coaching staff all left and another first-round exit from the playoffs, it was time for him to move on and for a new regime to take the Chargers further.
And only one year remaining on his contract.
And he was no spring chicken. If he’d hired a new coaching staff and then retired after the 2007 season, it would have left the Chargers very inconvenienced. That’s probably why the Chargers wanted veto rights on any candidate Marty was trying to hire.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Lost respect? Nah.
Moved on? Definitely.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Feb 10, 2010 8:47 AM PST up reply actions
Love Brees but...
The only two players I think that the Chargers should have never let go were Fred Dean and John Jefferson. I think that right there they lost a couiple of SuperBowls.
I’m so happy for Drew, I love the guy but I’m happier to have Mr Rivers handling the Chargers offense.
I think this is more about
Not trading tomlinson when his stock was high and he was healthy then drew brees. What if…. we would have traded him to minnesota for their draft pick Peterson? what if we went out and got a real saftey for tomlinson…. WHO would have taken over for tomlinson………………………………..MICHAEL TURNER….DUH. I think thats the real story on AJ he didnt get rid of tomlinson then and get value for what we can all see now as a cancer on our team.
Trading Tomlinson would have been a disappointment.
If we’d traded him before the ‘06 season, we’d be kicking ourselves. You and me and everybody else would have been screaming bloody murder if we’d traded him after the ’06 season for anything that anybody would give for a RB with 2000+ carries. After ’07 he had little to no trade value. Our only real hope was to let MT walk and hope we got our guy with the comp pick. No such luck, I know, but really, that one was handled more-or-less right, all things considered.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Feb 9, 2010 7:32 AM PST up reply actions
Nah…. stock market man buy low sell at it’s highest point hahahaha… I just think the runningback situation in the league changed during the 07 season running back by comittee (sp). I just hate LT’s attitude during the post season rather bitter about it. I do think we really would have benefited from keeping the burner/turner.
IIRC
Tomlinson’s contract was much too bulky to trade at that point anyway. There’s a reason why the rumors were that the Chargers were trying to trade Turner and not LT.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
by Wonko on Feb 9, 2010 12:08 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
The real story
is that a GM didn’t trade a hall of fame running back coming off an MVP season?
Yikes.
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Feb 9, 2010 7:43 AM PST up reply actions
Brees sucked for his first four years
The fourth year was the year he was supposed to be NFL ready. He wasn’t: That’s why the Chargers drafted Rivers. Everyone forgets the questions about his arm strength and his accuracy. You can only judge the Rivers draft decision based on the information available at the time.
Brees was definitely ready in his fourth year
Did you watch the 2004 Chargers?
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Why did they let Brees go…a) the shoulder b) Rivers is a stud…end of conversation.
"Where do you go from here, Dion?" "I go to Toronto."
Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.
C) They had to get Rivers in the first place ’cause Brees took too long to mature.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Feb 9, 2010 11:12 AM PST up reply actions
And their draft position (caused in part by Brees’ slowish development) forced them to pull the trigger on a QB given the composition of that years’ draft.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Feb 9, 2010 11:13 AM PST up reply actions
A valid point.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Feb 9, 2010 12:14 PM PST up reply actions
I'm still curious to see what people think
about whether Robert Gallery/Larry Fitzgerald/3 years of Sean Taylor was of equal or greater weight than Nate Kaeding, Shawne Merriman, and Roman Oben. I’m not sure I can say yes or no definitively either way. I don’t remember who we had kicking before Nate, but there’s no guarantee they make that kick against the Jets either.
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Feb 9, 2010 9:00 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
It's hard to say with any of them
With Hudson Houck as his O-line coach and not being part of the dismal raiders franchise maybe Gallery would have thrived in SD.
If Taylor played in SD instead of DC he probably would not have been in his house in Florida that night and would most likely be alive.
by Steve (Grey Suit) on Feb 9, 2010 9:15 AM PST up reply actions
Steve Christie was the PK
We brought him in to replace the disaster that was Wade Richey in late 2001. At the time we had him, he was near the end of his career, and any kick beyond 40 yards was like playing rock, paper, scissors.
"As a confirmed melancholic, I can testify that the best and maybe only antidote for melancholia is *action*. However, like most melancholics, I suffer also from sloth." - Edward Abbey.
by Jeff (sliderockmpc) on Feb 9, 2010 9:20 AM PST up reply actions
If so, then Christie vs. Kaeding appears to be a wash.
So then I guess it comes down to Gallery/Taylor/Fitzgerald vs. Merriman. Tough call. Maybe one of those guys helps win that playoff game in 2004? If so, how far can they reasonably go? Does their contribution in the following years equal or exceed Shawne’s?
We’re getting way into the realm of what-ifs and speculation.
My opinion is, at most, it’s probably a wash, and the team wouldn’t have been significantly better or worse with one of those three players instead of Merriman.
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Feb 9, 2010 9:23 AM PST up reply actions
Taylor may not fumble that interception against the Pats in 06
by Steve (Grey Suit) on Feb 9, 2010 9:38 AM PST up reply actions
Who knows if we even get there.
Or what seed we are. Or what situation the game is in. That’s way too far removed to start playing what-if?
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Feb 9, 2010 9:40 AM PST up reply actions
Larry Fitzgerald as the team's premier wide reciever would also likely mean we don't draft VJax
at least, we don’t take a project #1 wide reciever in the second round.
Yup, I'm the nut who believes Mark Loretta is a possible future Hall of Famer.
by StrangeBroP25 on Feb 9, 2010 7:42 PM PST up reply actions
excellent post John, but...
I have a few points/corrections. Drew Brees was atrocious the first part of his SD career. I was at his and PRs first pro games. The fans loved them and were glad they were playing. As a group in the stadium, no one was playing favorites. We loved them both and we ready to be patient. Brees showed a lot of spark and came into a game we were losing and almost brought us back (until a mental error sealed the loss.)
The fateful game.
Marty knew what was on the agenda. The whole two seasons (post PR) AJ wanted Brees out until he realized what he had. At that point he wants PR to start, show how great he was, add value as a trading chip, and promptly trade him in the off-season while offering Brees a long-term deal. At the same time, there were constant rumors that no matter how good Brees was, it was a matter of time before he was out. PR was jawing about how sick he was at not starting and heavily hinted he wanted to be traded if he wasn’t going to start (and at that time he wasn’t going to.) But Marty’s whole deal was that this was Brees’ team, Brees made it known that he wanted to start no matter what. Brees was insecure as a starter precisely because AJ showed that PR was his guy. I like it when teams play to win, no matter what their record. Actually, that is what gave us the 2004 first overall pick as the cardinals beat the Vikings last second to give us the pick. (Side note: we beat the raiders that day and still got the #1 pick. Delicious.) I don’t consider Marty being selfish (he may be, but not here. ) Indeed, he was being loyal to the guy he believed in.
Also, Brees was not in the final year of a rookie contract. He was franchised that year and probably would have been again if we didn’t want to trade Rivers. He was also guaranteed $10 mil by the saints, that is not back-up money.
One more thing. That was a brutal injury. I work on orthopedic procedures all the time, and everyone worth their salt knew Brees was a risk not work taking after that injury. But it all worked out and we lived happily ever after.
Bring back Balboa Stadium.
I'm pretty sure the sholder injury kept him from being franchise tagged in 06
The Chargers were rumored to be looking at extended Brees and trading Rivers up until that happened.
Look at this article from the UT from January 2006, It clearly says that the Chargers were looking at the possibility of trading Rivers and signing Brees to a long term deal.
http://legacy.signonsandiego.com/sports/chargers/20060112-9999-1s12brees.html
by Steve (Grey Suit) on Feb 9, 2010 9:36 AM PST up reply actions
People forget that in 2003 that Breese was no ones guy
One of the main reasons why the Chargers wanted Rivers over Rothlessburger is because Marty fell in love with him at the Senior bowl. There was talk before the draft that the Chargers were going to draft Rivers #1 before Eli went all John Elway on us. Going into training camp in 04 Rivers was pretty much already dubbed the starter and the only reason why Breese got his shot (Which he obviously took full advantage of) because of River’s contract dispute. Marty changed his tune on Breese after the 04 season but up until that point he was ready to kick him out the door.
I’m guessing that if the team was ready to move on after the 03 season Breese was not showing much promise in practice and they knew that it was more than just the 52 players around him that was the cause for his 67 QB rating. Sure we can look back with the advantage of hind side but in the end a lot of people who make a living off of player evaluation and who have been incredibly successful at it all though Breese was done so its hard for me to believe that anyone who did not have access to the team in 03 or has no scouting background can really make an accurate assessment of the situation.
by Steve (Grey Suit) on Feb 9, 2010 9:25 AM PST reply actions
I think there is something wrong with your "e" key
Better get that checked out.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
That's right!
People forget that Marty picked Rivers, not AJ.
No
A.J. was encouraged by Marty to pick Rivers since they decided together that they needed to draft a QB. Not quite the same thing as Marty picking Rivers.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
by Wonko on Feb 9, 2010 12:10 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Nice piece
But one disagreement. 6 years $60 million with $10 million guaranteed is nowhere near backup money. The Saints signed Drew to be the starter and paid him starter money.
Damn Revisionists. . .
I have a question…They offered him 2 million. I remember you telling me this when we were drinking at that nice Irish pub in Philly. Did the Chargers hit him with the Franchise Tag too at like 8 Million? I cannot remember, and if so, the saint would have had to give up something right?
I was arguing this with someone during the SB (Kevin Holden).
From Wikipedia
Brees became a free agent after the 2004 season and was not expected to return to San Diego, which had already committed a large sum of money to Rivers. The team eventually designated Brees a franchise player, giving him a one-year contract that quadrupled his pay to $8 million for 2005.
Under the terms of the franchise player contract, Brees was eligible to be traded or sign with another team, but the Chargers would have had to receive two future first round draft choices in return. He was not traded and continued to start the remainder of the 2005 season.
The Chargers offered Brees $2 million after the 2005 season. He turned it down and the Chargers declined to reapply the franchise tag to him making him a free agent. If they had used the franchise tag, it would have increased his franchise tender by 15% (I think) from the original $8 million. As a free agent though, the Saints were not required to pay any compensation and the Chargers were not entitled to a chance to match any contract offer made by another team. The Chargers did acquire compensation in the form of compensatory draft picks from the league, but those were a result of all the free agents lost in the post 2005 offseason, which obviously included Brees.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
In fairness to the Chargers
They offered Brees a 5-year, $50 million contract. The first year of which was only $2 million base, and heavily incentive-laden. The Chargers (and many other people) were still unsure of his arm after it was completely rebuilt. I can’t say I exactly blame the Chargers for essentially saying, “look, if your arm really is fine and you can play like you did last year, then you have nothing to worry about.”
I agreed with the decision at the time and I still agree with what happened, in spite of recent events.
by creanium on Feb 9, 2010 4:31 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
more fairness
I’m sure it’s been pointed out here, but Brees went onto the open market and had only 2 other teams interested in him. Two, and one of them ended up pulling their offer (the Dolphins) IIRC. I’m so tired of hearing the Chargers “got rid of”, “traded”, “cut”, or “released” Brees. He walked as a free agent, and took the best offer available. If it was so clear that Brees was an elite QB, why didn’t any of the other QB starved teams bite? The Chargers made a fair offer in light of the injury and their own depth chart. I thought it then and I believe it now; Rivers is a better QB than Brees.
Dolphins pulled their offer
Because team doctors didn’t clear him medically
Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
it kind of reminds me of that movie "You've got mail"...I'm Tom Hanks he's Meg Ryan -- Padres prospect Matt Antonelli on sdsuaztec4
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Feb 9, 2010 5:01 PM PST up reply actions
And because they had a trade worked out for Dante Culpepper.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
The definition of irony.
“We think Brees is a health risk. So let’s get Culpepper!”
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Feb 10, 2010 8:53 AM PST up reply actions
"got rid of" still applies
They failed to work out a deal before he reached free agency. They had an opportunity to work out a deal before he reached free agency and failed. While it may not be the best phrase to describe what happened, it still seems applicable. Letting someone enter free agency is effectively getting rid of them. They could have franchised him (and still been easily under the cap), that was another option they had and they did not choose it. So, without making judgments about what was right and what was wrong, you can’t really say that the Chargers weren’t making a choice about whether or not Brees would be a part of the team going forward. Choosing to not have him as part of the team going forward is effectively getting of him.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
I disagree
Letting someone enter free agency is effectively getting rid of them.
I don’t agree with this, considering they made what many believe to be a fair offer under the circumstances of his injury. What if the Saints pulled their offer (for whatever reason)? Would the Chargers have backed off, and pulled theirs, too? Was their offer just a PR move?
Letting someone enter free agency without even making a token offer (see Olshansky, Igor) is getting rid of them. Yes, they likely knew he wouldn’t accept the offer, and were prepared to move on, but there was the chance he’d stay.
I know it is only semantics, but I don’t like the negative connotation. Avowed Brees fans may disagree.
Fine
They didn’t get rid of him. He’s still a Charger and we just won the Super Bowl. Woo hoo!
It was weird how the Chargers played the Colts for the Championship though, since they are in the same conference. Someone should look into that.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Point taken
But that’s all more opinion than fact. I was just trying to lay out the facts. In the NFL, any money that’s not guaranteed is not really money that can be counted on. If for any reason Brees had to miss the beginning of the season and Rivers played well then there was a good chance that $2 million was all he’d get. It wasn’t a fair enough contract offer to keep a player from testing free agency.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
I don’t blame Drew at all for walking, or at the very least testing the free agency waters. New Orleans basically offered him the same contract (6 year-$60m) San Diego was (5y-$50m), just without the incentives. He would have been dumb not to take the Saints contract.
But at the same time, I don’t exactly blame the team for being a bit leery of trusting Drew’s arm to the tune of $10 million guaranteed. I see it as no different than a baseball veteran (read: old guy), or baseball player coming off a long injury, whose contract is incentive-laden based on plate appearances or innings pitched.
The Chargers don’t look so bad in the situation when you consider only two other teams offered anything to Drew, and one of those teams ended up rescinding their offer.
I think with all things considered, everything worked out well for both teams and both QBs involved.
Who are you trying to convince?
It seems like you keep trying to make a point that no one is disagreeing with.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Myself? Heh.
While no one involved in this conversation is disagreeing with me, this topic just gets me riled up because so many idiots out there think not only would we have won the Super Bowl on Sunday because Brees won it with another team, but that the Chargers kicked Brees out the door.
I’ll back down now, heh.
San Diego Went With Rivers And Let drew Go…. Drew Has A Super Bowl, And Rivers Doesnt…. Its In The Nature For San Diego Sports To Give False Hope… After This Last Season… I Dont Think I Will Ever See San Diego Win A Super Bowl In My Life Time… Of All The Post Season Losses… This Was The Most “Gut Wrenching”, “Heart Breaking” Of Them All
You Don't Have To Capitalize The First Letter Of Every Word.
Oh internet, what a wicked web you weave.
by Mad_Villain on Feb 10, 2010 12:57 AM PST up reply actions
This was an awesome post by John. And a debate that could go on for years.
As an outsider(Titans fan), I always wondered why AJ drafted Rivers. This post and its responses made it more clear for me now. I myself thought Brees was decent back when AJ pulled the trigger on the Manning/Rivers deal so I kinda questioned the logic too. But I really do think you guys made out better as it is. Sure you could have traded down and still picked up Sean Taylor or whatever DT you wanted, but you would have never got as much value out of the pick as AJ did with the Manning deal. The Merriman pick is what makes me believe this.
I do believe there is some truth to what some posters are saying about AJ having a predetermined image of what his players should be physically. And honestly I think thats why you all are going to be winning for a long time. You have a basketball-player-sized QB throwing to basketball-player-sized WRs, in a league where 6 foot DBs have been the norm for a long time. Everyone in the league has a lot of catching up to do when it comes to covering the receiving core that you guys have. AJ might look like an @$$ to a lot of people because of his persona and some of the moves that he has made, but someone has to make the tough decisions.
I think its going to be real interesting to see how the Chargers draft this year. Over on our blog(Music City Miracles) we are having a community draft and I have selected the Chargers which is how I stumbled upon this very informational post. Since the draft doesnt seem to be a hot topic for you all yet, I will check back later to read up on what you all are wanting out of the first two rounds. If LT is gone, then I am thinking RB, but I have been hearing rumors that the Chargers are interested in LenDale White, so I will have to wait and see on that situation.
And BTW, Rivers and Brees are both better than Manning so it looks like AJ kinda knew what he was doing right?
The interest is in the other guy...
We can always dream.
by frenchcharger on Feb 10, 2010 5:54 AM PST up reply actions
Not really a debate
The Chargers made a mistake in 2003 when they evaluated how good of a QB Brees could be and handled that mistake by making moves that really didn’t cost them very much (if any) in the short or long term. Anyone who believes otherwise is in denial.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
by Wonko on Feb 10, 2010 9:16 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Fair enough. The Chargers mis-evaluated Brees in 2003, but otherwise handled the situation about as well as one could have hoped for.
Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Feb 10, 2010 2:13 PM PST up reply actions
Yup.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Well then we agree. That was fun.
Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Feb 10, 2010 5:04 PM PST up reply actions
Yup.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by 

























