Norv Turner Press Conference Quotes
On Malcom Floyd's big game against the Redskins:
"Malcom and Buster Davis will end up getting game balls offensively. I thought Malcom would have that kind of game. I thought based on the way Washington played, the things Billy does well and the way Malcom is playing. He hasn't been that guy, and obviously we've spread the ball around to a lot of people, but when Gates went out and Vincent Jackson wasn't playing, there were some opportunities to really zero in and get him involved and get him part of it. He really responded. He's an outstanding player who has really gotten a lot better over the last year."
On who will start at Right Tackle in the playoffs:
"Dombrowski is the starting right tackle and I'm very impressed with the way he's played. I'm glad that Jon Runyan got to play. He played about 40 snaps yesterday. Dombrowski went over and played left tackle those 40 snaps and I was impressed with the way he made the adjustment to left tackle. It just gives you a good feeling to know that if we had an issue that we are in good shape in all our positions. If we had someone have to come out of a game, I'm confident that we could go in at any of the five offensive line positions and handle anything that might come up."
Is this the most rewarding season of your career as a head coach?
"It is. I'm not very good at comparing those things, but the biggest thing for me is the job the assistant coaches have done and the number of people we have that have contributed to this team. That part of it is impressive. Somebody had the number, I don't know exactly what it was, but they said 60 different guys have played in games for us. That's a lot of guys, but I know that on Sundays we play a lot of people. When we win a game, I think everyone feels that they were part of it and that's a great team feeling."
The rest of the press conference can be found after the jump.
Head Coach Norv Turner Press Conference
Monday, Jan. 4, 2010
Injury Update:
"From an injury standpoint, I'll give you an update. The guys that were inactive or the guys that have missed - Jacques Cesaire, Jacob Hester, Vincent Jackson, Shawne Merriman, Legedu Naanee, Eric Weddle - those guys I would expect to be able to participate at some level during this week. Again, I'm going to generalize, but I think all of them will be able to participate at some level this week. Then all of them without having a setback would be full go next week. Obviously the more they can do this week, the better I believe it is for them.
"From a standpoint of injuries in the game, James Holt has a shoulder injury and he will have surgery and he will be out. He's had a remarkable season for a young guy that came in here and just jumped out very early. He's really become a big part of our special teams. We'll have to replace him there. (Antonio) Garay strained his hamstring, but I think he'll be alright."
Opening statement:
"From the standpoint of the game, as I said yesterday, it was good for us to get our starters out. Most of them got about 20 plays. I thought they got good work and accomplished what we wanted to get done. Then our young guys, I think it's great for them to get a chance to play. The game was fast for them early. I think as they settled in to what we were doing and playing in a real game in terms of being a starter-like mentality, I thought we handled things extremely well and obviously I thought it was good for Billy to be in the situation he was in. To put that drive together at the end says a lot about those young guys and their abilities to play. It's nice to get Billy the reps; get him the opportunities. I hope he doesn't play over the next month, but I believe he'll be ready if he needs to be."
Is the bye week more important physically or mentally?
"I honestly believe it's both. First of all, physically it is a long season and you do get rest (with the bye). Everyone is in there lifting. They'll get a lift and a run in today and then tomorrow we'll be off. We'll get three good days of practice but the rest will come on the weekend, Saturday and Sunday. We'll play the following Sunday at 1:40 so we'll come in and do something on Monday, then Tuesday off and have a normal week after that. When you look at it you go Saturday, Sunday, Monday it'll be a light work and then Tuesday (off), they'll be rested physically. That's critical. Then the mental part of it is not only stepping back away from it for a second but we can really get into some detail in terms of preparation for this game and be real exact in what we want to do where sometimes during the season, and like we had for Tennessee you get into short weeks, you get into different types of game-plan situations where you have people injured and they don't get a lot of reps in practice. Sometimes you wish you had a little more time to prepare. That won't be the case here."
In late fourth-quarter drives, can you give us some insight into how you call plays?
"My intention is always to get first downs on first and second down. That makes it much smoother. Third downs are obviously critical any time of the game to keeping the drive alive. We spend a lot of time talking, whether it be a four-minute situation like we were in yesterday, the two-minute situation getting the ball with 50 seconds like we have. I think those things come from the preparation we've had all through the year. We had a major emphasis this year in training camp and our offseason work on the two-minute situation. We took it a step further and tried to come up with every possible scenario we could come up with. I think all of that has paid off for us."
In the playoffs is it even more critical?
"When you get in the playoffs, and it sounds very obvious, you're going to play a very good team. Obviously you're playing one of the best teams in the league. That's why they're in there. The one thing that Coach (Jimmy) Johnson used to always talk about is that it's the team that plays the best when you get to that point. In other games you are better than someone. In these games, it is the team that plays the best and the team that plays the best handles all those different situations. Obviously those are game-changing situations."
Do you feel you guys are the team playing the best right now?
"We're playing at a real high level. I think there are a number of teams that are playing extremely well. We had an outstanding game with Dallas in early December and they've really taken off. You look at the teams in the AFC and they're going that way (up). To me it's not what you've done or how well you've played. You get a three-and-a-half hour game and you need to play better than the team you're playing against."
Can you talk about the job Hal Hunter and Don Johnson have done?
"We did have some changes on the staff and one of the things I always talk to coaches about, and I probably got this from John Robinson, there are two things when you talk to your team. We've got a lot of marquee, big-time players. In the spring we talked about, ‘Hey, let's see how many guys can go out and have their best season of their career.' We had a lot of guys that did that. I talked to the coaches the same way. ‘Lets see how many guys on this staff can have their best year ever coaching.' To do what we did on the offensive and defensive lines, you say that Don Johnson I think has had an outstanding year and worked with a lot of different people. Hal Hunter and Mike Sullivan together with the offensive line, they've done a great job, particularly when you look at the center position and the changes we had there and Mooch playing as many games as he did. Then starting the last 11 games a rookie at right guard and right tackle, that's hard to do."
How do you avoid coming out rusty after the bye?
"I think it's something this team has done a good job...we practice fast. This week we can reduce the reps just a little bit, but when we go, you just have to go fast and you have to maintain that type of mentality. I think that's the strength of this team. Even when we were struggling, I know I commented on it and it doesn't help when you say it but you're not playing as well as you'd like, but we have practiced well and I believe we will continue to."
How do you prepare when you don't know who you are going to play?
"It's the position you're put in and we will prepare for the situations that are going to come up in this game. We just talked about it - whether it be red zone; whether it be backed up; whether it be goal line; whether it be two minute - we will get those situations handled and we will work hard on them. We will look at different things that teams do and do a little bit of each, but in those situations, things tend to be a little more standard. There are a lot of similarities between all the teams you play. Obviously we have to wait until this weekend is over to find out exactly who we're playing. Then we'll get into the specifics of that team."
Is it even more important this time of year to have a guy like Malcom step up when you're playing good teams that can take other guys away?
"There is another guy that's in the mix and I think Malcom has been that guy and people know that getting ready for us, that we do have balance. I think when you visually see it on tape and you say, ‘Wow, here are the things they do with this guy,' it's something else you have to prepare for it."
What are the expectations within the organization?
"I think everyone knows what we want to accomplish. That's been from the start, but I'm not going to get ahead of myself and I'm not going to let my guys get ahead of themselves. We talked about it last night in the locker room: in this league, if you want to do something, you have to go earn it. That's been a great lesson learned by a lot of people in our organization. There have been times obviously in the past where people pick you and it's a foregone conclusion in someone's mind. It is not a foregone conclusion in anyone's mind. We know that we're going to play an awfully good football team and we're going to have to play at our best to move to the next round of the playoffs."
But do you feel confident in the next round considering who you might play?
"As I said, we're going to play a real good team and teams have different scenarios that affect them. If someone told me that we were going to go through the season with Mruczkowski at center and Vasquez at right guard and Dombrowski at right tackle and we're going to win a number of games in a row with those guys, I might have been a little skeptical. I don't think because someone is hurt or someone has had a change based on injury that you expect to get anything different."
How do you explain playoff football to your young players?
"That's one thing this team has. Our guys, our core guys and they'll help the young guys in the preparation, but we have a lot of guys who have not only played in the playoffs but have won games and won close games. We won the overtime game last year in the playoffs. We had a great win in Indy two years ago in the playoffs. They've experience that and they've experienced the other side of it. I do know that our guys understand that it can end real fast if you don't go out and do the things you're capable of doing."
What did you take away from your Super Bowl experiences with Dallas that you might be applying right now?
"It's so different and it was a long time ago. I went to two (Super Bowls with the Cowboys). With the Rams we went to two championship games. I've been to a championship game here two years ago. To me, what I just said, you've got high expectations and you want to go out and be the best team but you've got to go out and earn it. It's a one-game-at-a-time deal and as I said it can end fast."
How much of an edge over the other teams is your team's playoff experience?
"I don't know that it's an edge over the other teams, but certainly it's a great feeling to know that you've got guys who have been in the playoffs, have experienced the playoffs and had success in the playoffs."
Do you deserve to be in the Coach of the Year conversation, as a reflection of the team as much as you?
"Those things...it's not a big issue for me. I'm glad that Philip's name has been brought up over the last two or three weeks regarding MVP, but I don't think that's an issue for him. I know that we've put ourselves in this position and we want to go make the most of it."
How has Runyan handled not moving into the starting lineup?
"Jon has been great. Jon is a pro and I think he's enjoying being part of this team. Playing yesterday, playing the week before gets you to feel more of a part of it. He's fit in great with our offensive line and he's helped Dombrowski a great deal."
Who replaces Holt on special teams?
"We've got a number of guys and we've had some guys who have not been able to be up, whether it be at different times Marques Harris, who was not active a couple weeks. C.J. Spillman was not active for a number of games but played yesterday and was outstanding on special teams. We'll make that decision as we go through."
You mentioned maybe shortening practice to keep guys sharp. How do you do that?
"It's really not significant. It is to them because it's numbers of reps where in a drill we normally do 12 plays but we might cut it to nine. If you do that in five different periods, you take out 15 plays of a normal practice. Again, it's about what we talked about earlier: mentally being sharp and physically making sure we take advantage of this week."
Has your heightened execution in practice translated to games?
"Absolutely. It's just the confidence you have. Games are different. You've got to go beat someone who is talented and you've got to block them and do whatever those things are. There's no question if you practice fast and that's your normal tempo then you make that adjustment to games on Sundays much easier."
Do you expect Shawne Merriman to be 100 percent?
"I don't know that he'll be 100 percent, but I know that this week will help him greatly and I hope there are some things he can do (in practice) if we're working a pass-rush period, if we're working a third-down period. I hope he's able to get some reps, but I would expect him to be the healthiest he's been in quite a while."
What were your impressions of the Jets last night?
"When you play defense and run the ball and give a lot of different looks like they do... Obviously they were impressive in the game and it'll be a real good game next week."
0 recs |
50 comments
|
Comments
Interesting
I think Dombo has earned the starting job but knowing that you have Runyan in there as a back up is a huge plus.
The one and only AzDuck
Re: Pic
What kind of leg? A weird bird leg?
Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you? ◔ヮ◔
Uncommon Sportsman :: Absurdity in play
I think he means what type of leg for a super bowl win
I trust that Axion isn’t making fun of a prosthetic leg and just trying to find humor in the sign.
The one and only AzDuck
I didn’t see it until I made it bigger.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Jan 5, 2010 10:59 AM PST up reply actions
The leg blended in photographer behind it
But I also wanted to callback to weird bird legs so everyone would keep voting for that chick we’ve been assigned.
Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you? ◔ヮ◔
Uncommon Sportsman :: Absurdity in play
So it sounds like this week
They’re going to work on fundamentals and get a solid foundation for the standard situations. Then next week make adjustments and practice for the team they’re going to play.
Sounds like a good plan to me.
Yup. This week is also about not getting rusty. I like the idea of practicing “fast” to keep everyone from relaxing too much.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Jan 5, 2010 10:59 AM PST up reply actions
I like how
In the postseason the bye week makes you rusty and in the regular season its a refreshing week where teams can work on things to get better.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Great point.
Also, Norv is 2-1 after a bye with Chargers.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Jan 5, 2010 11:50 AM PST up reply actions
FBO basically said the same thing a few weeks ago
Basically, in the playoffs, if a team wins after their bye week, it’s thanks to the refreshing bye. But if they lose, it’s because they’re rusty from not playing.
And that historically-speaking, “momentum” going into the playoffs is a load of bull and has little bearing on success
There is something to be said for momentum
But it comes with two caveats:
1. It’s how you are playing and who you have healthy down the stretch, not necessarily your wins and losses.
2. A bad matchup can kill any momentum.
The bye week shouldn’t influence any of those. The plays you were calling, the players’ injury status and the skills that the players were utilizing before the bye week with not disappear or diminish after the bye week.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
*with not disappear = will not disappear
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Never gonna happen.
Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
Why? Me no get it.
There are lots of forums out there that allow posts to be edited only until they’ve been replied to, or that advise readers when they’ve been edited. Functionality and integrity do go together sometimes.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Jan 5, 2010 4:03 PM PST up reply actions
Because too many people would take advantage and try to erase the stupid comments they made in the past.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
I would've guessed
that the back end doesn’t support it. This is a unique platform for a forum, the way it handles comments is supposed to encourage lots of posts in a sequence. If you screw up, just post again.
That, and there’s probably no money to be made in going back to allow edits.
Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you? ◔ヮ◔
Uncommon Sportsman :: Absurdity in play
Comments do have a timestamp
(programatically) easy enough to only allow editing within X minutes of timestamp.
This.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Jan 5, 2010 7:54 PM PST up reply actions
or Maybe X minutes from timestamp
And no replies yet.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
The comment timestamps
are just page jumps so you can link to individual comments. It’s just good design that they also tell you what time it was.
Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you? ◔ヮ◔
Uncommon Sportsman :: Absurdity in play
I think all columnists should be allowed to edit
Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
Representing the San Diego State University Aztecs, home of the 2009 College Cheerleading National Champions in the all women's division.
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Jan 5, 2010 11:25 PM PST up reply actions
I think all commenters should use the preview button.
Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Jan 6, 2010 12:08 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
agreed
Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
Representing the San Diego State University Aztecs, home of the 2009 College Cheerleading National Champions in the all women's division.
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Jan 6, 2010 12:36 AM PST up reply actions
Double agreed
Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you? ◔ヮ◔
Uncommon Sportsman :: Absurdity in play
Here's the article I mentioned
(Requires ESPN insider)
http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insider/news/story?id=4775542
However
They are still just trying to base this notion on wins and losses being counted as momentum. The evidence presented is hardly exhaustive either. They use a couple of cases to “debunk” the idea that momentum is “crock”, when those could simply be outliers. It would have made more sense if they just called momentum overrated and then listed a number of cases where momentum (or lack thereof) would have dictated success (or lack thereof) in the playoffs, but the results were the opposite. That would encourage people to simply question the idea of momentum instead of having to take their word for it that it is a “crock”.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
What would be interesting
Would be to take all the playoff teams who have a Weighted DVOA higher than their Season DVOA and all the playoff teams who had their Weighted DVOA lower than their Season DVOA and see which produced higher DVOAs in the playoffs. You’d probably have to do something to normalize since one groups DVOA might be bit a bit higher than the other group and I would assume that teams with higher regular season DVOA tend to have high playoff DVOAs.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
I was thinking the same thing
That is a straightforward enough definition. When forming a (statistical) hypothesis, it does bring up interesting questions like the proper definintion of “momentum” itself: should 4 game momentum be more impressive than 3 game momentum, etc.. The normalization would be a little tricky. I was thinking of correlating playoff winning pct with a definition of “momentum”, but it would be hard to separate the various effects, i.e., teams with an overall high DVOA ( but not necessarily with momentum) doing well in the playoffs.
Momentum can be a factor, but I agree it can be an overstated one
On some other thread a week or so ago I posted a link to a Wall Street Journal article about teams having momentum headed into the play-offs or not having any…. Richard posted it in his Jan. 4 links….
There IS SOME correlation to how teams do in the playoffs; but it’s hardly definitive…. The article is very much “on the surface,” yet it still makes a few points and provides a bit of data, albeit not great data.
“Teams losing momentum late in the year tend to struggle to get back on track in the playoffs,” it asserts.
“Since the 16-game schedule began in 1978, 61 teams have entered the playoffs having won two or fewer of their last five games. And only one of those teams, the 2006 Indianapolis Colts, won the Super Bowl. But of the 47 NFL teams that entered the playoffs on five-game winning streaks since 1978, 10 have won the Super Bowl.”
That’s not that telling, but somewhat: about 30% of the SB winners had a lot of momentum entering the playoffs in the last 3+ decades; those teams would have had between a 1 in 8 or a 1 in 12 chance of winning it all, if all other things were equal, which of course they’re not (based on how many teams made the playoffs, for fewer used to…)…. Of course there are injuries, bye weeks, home field advantage, etc. A bunch of other variables….
“Since 1978, 72% of teams on five-game winning streaks won their first playoff game, compared with 56% of teams that won four of their last five, and 52% of teams that won three of their last five.”
So there seems to be at least some correlation. Causation of course would be harder (if not impossible) to prove….
We're gonna roll, folks
I got a good feeling about this.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
Regarding rust after a bye week
There are a lot of players left on this team from 2006, when the Chargers went 14-2 but lost to the Patriots at home after the bye week. The core players were all on that team and remember what that was like. I think that experience is going to help in preparations and focus over the next 2 weeks that rust or overconfidence won’t be an issue.
Ducks - 2009 Pac 10 Champs
Chargers - 2009 AFC West Champs
Things could be much worse, I could be a fuskies & Broncos fan.
That 2006 team wasn't rusty
They just played like they had been playing and it wasn’t enough to beat the Patriots.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
by Wonko on Jan 5, 2010 2:45 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I agree. My “rust” comment was just in reference to the question posed to Norv.
How do you avoid coming out rusty after the bye?
I guess I just feel much less worried that the 1st round bye will have a negative impact on the team because those players experienced 2006. I heard a comment during the Redskin game that Rivers said something like he felt like he wasn’t ready for the moment in 2006, but he feels like he is this year.
Ducks - 2009 Pac 10 Champs
Chargers - 2009 AFC West Champs
Things could be much worse, I could be a fuskies & Broncos fan.
by MarineCorpsDuck on Jan 5, 2010 3:03 PM PST up reply actions
LT was sharp
Did they not play as well as they might have because they were rusty or because they were nervous/not ready for that big a stage, or too green…?… Hard to say…. Wasn’t it Parker who seemed “rusty” or off his game?… And then there was just not smart: McCree.
And I still question Marty’s going for it on 4th and long when Kaeding could’ve kicked a FG from the mid-40’s (maybe it would’ve been a 46- or 47-yarder?) in the first half…. Someone recently said that that was borderline for his range that day (what Marty’d seen or been told in Nate’s pre-game warm-ups), but I was livid at the time; so I think Marty was a bit “off,” too…. I guess you wouldn’t exactly call it “rust.” (It’s not like it was 4th and short: just try the FG, man!…) … Maybe he didn’t trust Kaeding after his miss against the Jets in the playoffs….
Well, at least we can trust Nate now…. ;)
Was that the year that Kaeding hurt his hip?
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
No, that was the year before
According to a March 3, 2006 Sporting News article:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1208/is_9_230/ai_n26780501/
As far as other injuries go, in 2007 Kaeding injured his left non-kicking leg on the opening kickoff Dec. 24 vs. Denver, but remained in contest and went 3-for-3 on FGs…. A few weeks later in January, “he went 4-of-4 in AFC Championship Game at NE on day not ideal for kicking as temperature at KO was 23 degrees with wind gusts of 17-22 mph that lowered wind chill factor to nine degrees.”
Last year he strained his groin and was on the injury report prior to the Steeler game listed as “probable.”
Can’t recall or find anywhere that he was injured for that Patriot game at the Q the year we were 14-2.
Schottenheimer, ironically, went away from Marty-Ball in that game
He had beaten the Patriots with a strong 2nd half running game with LT and Turner previously, but let Cameron call pass plays more than usual when we had the lead; I guess if it’d worked, we’d have all been praising them for the change-up, but Rivers threw a pick.
Anyway, this is the quote I found about why Marty went for it on 4th and 11 from the Patriots 30 (or it might have been the 31):
“I thought we had a play that we could use that would make the yardage,” Schottenheimer said. “The intention was to be very aggressive. I thought we had a play that would get it and Cam Cameron said, ’I’ve got one’ and we went ahead and did it.”
By the way, Parker had a couple of drops and fumbled a punt, but the Patriots’ drive following that fumble stalled on a 3rd and 13 only to have Drayton Florence flagged for a 15-yard penalty; and NE scored a TD later in that drive…. SO many mistakes in that game which we will NOT make later this month.
That '06 team lost after their regular season bye, too.
To the Ravens. The ‘08 Chargers didn’t do very well after their bye, either, beating the 2-14 Chiefs at home by just one point. Not that this matters; just sayin’.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Jan 5, 2010 4:05 PM PST up reply actions
http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_14128601?nclick_check=1
Chargers sign
Dontarrious Thomas
hmm interesting
Chambers. It hasn't been that long
but does anyone remember who initiated the process that lead to Chris Chambers getting cut? He was demoted first, but I assume the wheels were already in motion at that time. Just wondering if there was a consensus on the process that occurred, specifically whether Norv went upstairs, or once he was demoted, AJ Smith forced the release.
There wasnt a consensus
Alot of people on the board think it was about the drops, but I think it was solely a STs decision. We had just been owned by Eddie Royal, our LB core was decimated by injuries; and when Chambers was demoted it was obvious.
Its really this simple. Chargers “Floyd is going to start, we need you to play STs”
Chambers “You guys know I dont cover kicks”
Chargers “Well our backups cover kicks, thanks anyway. Later”
It was sort of that simple
The only caveat being that it took over a week and injuries to our LBs for that simulated conversation to occur. Chambers was demoted, we played a game with Floyd as the starter, a couple of LBs got hurt, A.J., Norv and Ollie had simultaneous panic attack, Chambers was cut.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
by Wonko on Jan 5, 2010 11:28 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Don't forget about Chambers' personal situation
I think his on-the-field performance was the #1 factor; but then again, that may have been affected by what was going on with the rest of his life…. Change of scenery in KC really helped him.

by 






















