Game Preview: Jets at Chargers
I apologize if this game preview winds up being a little bit shorter than game previews from the regular season. There's a couple legitimate reasons for that happening (if it indeed happens):
One, I'm currently "vacationing" in San Diego...which means until Sunday I have way too much planned for each day and I'll probably wind up late (or missing) everything I have scheduled. So time is of the essence.
Two, for as much as I'm going to look back at these "teams" in the regular season for this game preview, the playoffs are a different animal. You can get a feeling for how good a player is during the regular season, and that player could become five times less effective or five times more effective in the playoffs for no other reason besides stress and the fact that the playoffs are typically played a little faster than regular season games. In summary, the past is not as meaningful as it once was.
So, in the following game preview, instead of breaking down every single matchup I'm going to give you my game prediction and why I think it'll unfold that way.
When the Jets Have the Ball
We'll split this prediction into two sides like this. When the Jets have the ball, the advantage lies in the hands of the Chargers. Again, that's just my belief, but it's supported by the fact that the Chargers have been a pretty stable defense this year. For all the yards they've given up, and all of the random drives where they've slipped into "soft zone" and looked terrible (twice against the Browns), this is not a defense that gives up a ton of first downs or a ton of points to opposing offenses.
On top of that, it is a defense that can be a bit confusing. Corner blitzes, Safety blitzes and a mad genius MLB in Stephen Cooper means that there's a good chance Mark Sanchez may not know where the blitz is coming from when it's coming. I like that.
Rookie QBs are usually in that group of players that get five times worse when the playoffs come around, and I think that trend will continue on Sunday. So, why was he so good against the Bengals last week? There are a few reaons, starting with the fact that most of the Bengals best defensive players finished the season on Injured Reserve. Another reason is that the Bengals are one of the few teams left in the NFL that play a 4-3 and rarely blitz, meaning Mark and the rest of the Jets knew exactly who was coming on each player and could exploit matchups they had against former backup LBs with short passes and strong inside runs.
While the Chargers defensive line is filled with former backups itself, the linebackers group and the entire secondary is healthy and talented. This is a defense that, contrary to Cincinnati, has gottten better all season and is capable of holding powerful offenses like the Cowboys' to less than 30 points.
Obviously, the key to the game is the Chargers offense. They can take away the Jets' running game simply by putting up points. If this game is close, the Jets running attack might do some damage....but I remain unafraid. Call me silly, but I am not the type to fear something that has yet to happen. Since the Chargers made drastic changes on the defensive side of the ball after getting shredding by the Ravens' and Steelers' running games, I don't know that I've seen a RB be really effective against the Bolts. Certain players, like Marion Barber, could pick up 7 yard runs but also could be stopped on the very next play.
I woulsdn't go so far as to say this tatement is true, but I might be convinced if somebody within the team said that the 4.5 YPC against the Chargers defense had more to do with the fact that the team is not looking at the run when they're up by 2 scores in the second half and they're essentially "garbage yards". I'm not saying I think the Chargers run D is great....I just don't think any team, including the Jets, is going to be able to run it 90% of the time and score points on San Diego.
When the Chargers Have the Ball
Similar to my stance above, my belief in the Chargers offense has everything to do with the fact that I have not seen them struggle. Against very good defenses in Dallas and Philadelphia, the Chargers defense seemed to perform at about 80% it's potential....which still makes it the best passing offense in the league.
Darrelle Revis doesn't scare me for this one reason: In the mdidle of the season, when Vincent Jackson had about 5 games with little to no production, the Chargers offense was still putting up a ton of yards and ton of points with the same amount of ease. Antonio Gates and Malcom Floyd stepped up, Mike Tolbert started to get more involved in teh passing game, and Philip Rivers kept the team moving towards and into the end zone.
Call me a homer, but I'm not different from the Colts fans with Peyton Manning or the Saints fans with Drew Brees. If the worst you can do is take away Philp's 2nd favorite target (I think Gates led the team in receptions again this year), I'm still confident that he's going to do what he wants to do with all of the weapons he has left. If you're going to blitz him, it makes it even easier for him (since he's the best QB in the league against the blitz).
As much as everyone respects Vincent Jackson and understands his ability to stretch the defense, at this point we're ready to follow Rivers into battle with any other receivers by his side. The guy is Mozart in the pocket: avoiding the rush, finding the open receiver and putting the ball exactly where it should go in his hands. Whether that receiver is Jackson, Gates, Floyd, Legedu Naanee, Buster Davis, Darren Sproles, LaDainian Tomlinson or Mike Tolbert means no different to him, the offensive output and therefore...the fans feelings about the offense.
Conclusion
When I think about this game, one thing keeps coming to mind. If you, like me, believe that at the end of the season the Bengals were a "bad" team that could no longer overcome their injuries or the emotional drain of losing Chris Henry, these Jets have not beaten a good team since Week 2 of the Regular Season. Sure, they've beaten bad teams like the Bills and Bucs, but that does not make them a playoff-caliber team just yet. Those are baby-steps.
The Chargers are in the league that the Jets just cannot compete in, unless the Chargers turn the ball over and make mental mistakes (like penalties). In the past, I've always said that the Chargers turn the ball over less and are penalized less than just about every other NFL team over the last three years. As long as they stay true to form in that regard, I don't think anything can stand in their way of beating the Jets.
2 recs |
43 comments
|
Comments
Check you out,vacationing...
sounds like a jet setting, sports blog editor, big wig kinda thing.NICE….
Am I right that the Jets have only faced one 3-4 D?
I mean, I know they have a similar D to ours, but has Sanchez seen any similar defenses in a game, besides the Pats?
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Jan 15, 2010 10:50 AM PST reply actions
I'm not even sure
That I would consider the Jets 3-4, Pats 3-4 or Phins 3-4 the same sort of thing as the Chargers/Cowboys 3-4s.
To me you have a few different versions:
You have the “Ravens 3-4” run by the Jets, Ravens, 49ers and Broncos.
You have the “Wade Phillips 3-4” run by the Cowboys and Chargers.
You have the “Parcells 3-4” run by the Dolphins, Chiefs and Patriots.
You have the “Steelers 3-4” run by the Steelers and Packers.
The Ravens/Steelers are probably close to each other as are the Parcells/Phillips ones.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Is it too much to ask
to maybe get a brief rundown of the differences?
by Natrone Bomb on Jan 15, 2010 12:58 PM PST up reply actions
I can't do too much detail
I know the Ravens 3-4 is more focused on disguising coverages and attacking blitzes with 6 or more blitzers. Lots of man coverage.
The Steelers 3-4 is based on a zone blitz concept where DL can drop into coverage at times with multiple LBs coming.
The Wade Phillips 3-4 is a zone coverage, typically 4-5 man rush using different LBs as rushers, but no zone coverage by DL.
I’m not sure how to typify the Parcells 3-4. I can’t think of a signature play for it. It might be a hybrid of them all or it might be something different. I definitely would say that it doesn’t rely on zone blitzes or 6 or more blitzers that much, so it’s kind of like Wade’s in that fashion. The coverages may be more man to man though.
The Wade Phillips and Ravens 3-4s both come from a coaching tree that starts with Buddy Ryan though (Wade worked for him in the 1980s). Parcells and Belicheck never worked with any of the other coaching trees. LeBeau and Capers never worked with any others’ coaching trees.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
by Wonko on Jan 15, 2010 1:57 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Vacationing?
Must be nice to vacation in America’s Finest and live there too. One factor that has to be considered is playoff experience. Four straight years of “rookie” mistakes have been our downfall. This time heads are screwed on right. FOCUS and EXECUTION are the prevailing words. River’s has the accuracy to beat any defender, including Mr. Revis
Someone’s been paying attention
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Jan 15, 2010 8:00 PM PST up reply actions
Stalker!
Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Jan 16, 2010 11:28 AM PST up reply actions
I did indeed. It’s stinking up my suitcase and ready for Sunday.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Jan 15, 2010 8:00 PM PST up reply actions
well written article
really enjoyed it and agree that jets don’t stand much of a chance in this game unless we turn the ball over and commit dumbass penalties.
like your conclusion but still worried
This Jets D has cut team production by a touchdown, which is huge. It has been awhile, but a ferocious pass rush can frustrate our offense. Pittsburgh mauled us, Baltimore was tough and we had to fight in NY.
They will try to run with play action passes. It is very likely they can do that against our soft-ish D-Line.
I think the key will be our offense. If we can move the ball, we will win. If they get a bunch of stops, FG’s and some turnovers, they will probably win. A low scoring grind out game, we probably lose.
But, if Turner/Rivers can move the ball, our defense rests and stays fresh and we win. The first few series will say a lot. I almost holding my breath.
Baltimore game
Was without Hardwick, Vazquez and LT.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
I'm guessing the offensive line will perform much better this time around.
"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds
by Zach (maestro876) on Jan 15, 2010 1:03 PM PST up reply actions
I don't want...
…to get my hopes up, but I feel LT having a special game coming on. He’s been waiting all season for this opportunity. He’s healthy. He’s at home. He’s got Hardwick in front of him, again. It could be the LT we’ve been seeing the past cuppla months: 60ish yards with a few 10 yarders mixed in there. What if he has a 120 yard day? Or even 100?
Totally unsubstantiated.
Maybe his tires really are showing their tread. Or maybe, he’s been saving it all season for the next three games. I dunno, I got a feeling.
I totally agree shaaners
LT may have a great game. That may or may not happen, but it’s a GOING to be a blowout. The Jets can’t score. We can. The Jets D is a high risk high reward scheme. This will be a lesson of what happens when a team full of rookies plays in the divisional round.
run game schrum game, the Chargers have the exact same # of rush TD’s as the Jets.
just pray for no injuries. Cos if we come out of this game healthy. The superbowl will be that much closer. the only thing worse than losing this game would be winning this game with a few severe injuries and the ravens/colts playing next week healthy. that would be heartbreaking.
To me
A great game for LT at this point would be 80ish yards with a good YPC. Any more yards than that and I’d feeling like we were just keeping the game close instead of going for the jugular with the passing game.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
totally agree nick
if we do end up blowing out the jets like I believe, and come out 100% healthy, there is really nothing else stopping us besides ourselves. Regardless, I am stoked for sunday as we have all been waiting for this game for a year.
by sdjordan1086 on Jan 15, 2010 2:37 PM PST up reply actions
I concur...
I don’t think the Jets are all too spectacular. The only thing that worries me, is that they come out in fierce and physical mode, whereas we come out all quiet and calm. The crowd needs to get into it, the players need to be fired up, the coaches need to trust their gut and take chances when an opportunity presents itself.
now heres MY crazy prediction
Rivers 20/27 263yds 2td 1int
LT 18 carries 81yds 2td
DS 4 carries 20yds
VJ 3 rec 65yds 1td
Gates 5 rec 60yds 1td
Floyd 5 rec 77yds
LN 2 rec 18yds
DS 2 rec 16yds
LT 2 rec 19yds
MT 1rec 8yds
by Superduperboltman on Jan 15, 2010 12:57 PM PST reply actions
Chargers 97
Jets 0
"Get on board early," Black said, alluding to, what he feels, is a crop of up-and-coming players.
"I would tell those fans that we're going to play good baseball. We're going to play hard. We're going to have exciting young players..." -Bud Black
This is funny mostly because you’ve won so many of the predictions.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Jan 15, 2010 8:01 PM PST up reply actions
found this over on the jets blog!! thought it was funny stuff haha
The DVOAs show that its a statistical impossibility that Rivers will ever throw an incompletion again for the rest of his career. And his receivers are all 8’6" tall, weighing 300 pds each, and run 3.76 40s, with 4 hands and 60" verticals. If Revis covers one guy he’ll just throw to another for a TD every time.
by D-richman on Jan 15, 2010 6:38 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Sounds like they've done their research
Finally, some reasonable Jets fans.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
by Wonko on Jan 15, 2010 6:55 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Do me a favor John
Go to the Fish Market on the bay and have a Duckett’s Buckett and an Anchor draft for me please.
lmfao
When the Jets come to SD and hit you hard and often on all sides of the ball, you won’t be putting up 30. You won’t be sustaining drives, either and they’ll grind out the clock. There is a reason why “defense wins championships” is the oldest axiom in sports. if the Chargers share your opinions come Sunday, they’ll get embarrassed.
Classic example of the "soothsayer" troll.
if the Chargers share your opinions come Sunday, they’ll get embarrassed
I suppose you want us to beware the Ides of March as well?
Banned from Arrowhead Pride... and Music City Miracles certainly don't like me very much, either.
"Ah act the way ah feel." --Elvis Presley
by StrangeBroP25 on Jan 16, 2010 8:14 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Any team...
that thinks it will do whatever it wants to a #1 defense is asking for trouble. Any team that can not match its opponent’s intensity is likely to get rolled. That’s not trolling, that’s real. If the Chargers are as full of as much bluster as their fans, they are in for a long day on Sunday.
by mad science on Jan 16, 2010 12:16 PM PST up reply actions
Fans are fans.
We’re confident, but we’ve got good reason to be.
The players are a different animal. In fact, so far I’ve heard trash or favorable own-team comparisons from Cotchery, Revis, Rhodes, and Demetrius Byrd. That’s three starting Jets and a Charger on IR who’s never played with the team.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Jan 16, 2010 12:42 PM PST up reply actions
I actually agree that defense is a big deal in championship runs.
But don’t discount the Chargers’ defense. The “matchup” doesn’t favor the Jets very well: it looks on paper like a hard-runner vs. a soft D, but look more closely. Since midseason, the Chargers have been pretty solid stopping straight-ahead runs. The Jets will have a very hard time managing long fields, but will be able to get points off midfield possessions so long as they don’t get greedy or give up big penalties.
There are pretty much two ways to get short fields: turn the ball over, or give up a score. Obviously, giving up points is even worse than a long field, but good red zone defense might keep the Jets in despite field goals. This is what the Ravens did: their offense got them 31, and their defense made stops when it counted. But the Ravens didn’t face Hardwick or Tomlinson. Turning the ball over is the other way, but the Chargers are very hard to get turnovers out of, and the Jets aren’t a big turnover defense.
As for passing the ball, somehow I don’t think Jam/Cro/Weddle/whoever is at all worried about the Jets’ receivers, and SD’s pass rush will be much better than Cincy when it comes to managing play-action. The Jets protect well inside, which is critical to surviving in the NFL, but they’ve been susceptible to good edge-rushes already and the SD scheme is a bad matchup for their OL: Shawne and Shaun are not sack-machines so much this year, but they do force a lot of mistakes, and Sanchez may still be a little raw. So 3rd/long is a very cold place for Schotty-B. This means that the Jets OL must play mistake-free football: false-starts or holding penalties can ruin drives for any team, but tomorrow it’s true to a much greater degree.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Jan 16, 2010 12:37 PM PST up reply actions
You know the funny thing about humble pie...
is it tastes like shit.
Be worried.... "Lights Out"
I’ve read most of the blips here and the same old theme comes to mind…..
California Dreamin’ !!! It WILL be an interesting game and yes, the Chargers have an awesome passing offense. But you best wake up and realize you have not faced a defense like the Jets, nor have you seen an offensive line like the Jets.
You best ‘lite it up early’ to try to get them off their game ’cause these Jets are going to pound you over and over ’til this game ends. Your only chance will come early or late (if Jets defense has another late game lapse…. not likely). Else it will be “Lights Out” for the Chargers.
I'm going to assume by "a defense like the Jets" you're referring to your top-ranked total and passing D.
Your use of total defense and pass defense as metrics are severely flawed. But I’ll humor you and use the same statistical scale. One of the High Priests of DVOA like Wonko or Richard can set us straight later.
We have faced the Raiders twice (#26 in total defense, #7 in pass defense), Ravens (#3 in overall, #8 in passing), Dolphins (22 and 24), Steelers (5 and 16), Broncos twice (7 and 3), Chiefs twice (30 and 22), Eagles (12 and 17), Browns (31 and 29), Cowboys (9 in both categories), Bengals (4 and 6), Titans (22 and 31), and Redskins (10 and 8).
Alright, let’s throw out the Dolphins, Chiefs, Browns, and Eagles, who are average to abysmal in both categories. That leaves us with:
Raiders x2 (26 and 7)
Ravens (3 and 8)
Steelers (5 and 16)
Broncos x2 (7 and 3)
Cowboys (9 and 9)
Bengals (4 and 6)
Redskins (10 and 8)
This all means that we have faced 6 of the top ten total defenses in the NFL, and 6 of the top 10 pass defenses. Furthermore, that’s three of the top 5 “overall” defenses.
(By the way, our record against these teams is 6-3.)
So while you guys are number one in those respects, it’s unfair to say:
you best wake up and realize you have not faced a defense like the Jetsbecause I would say those top 10 defenses are “like” the Jets.
What it all comes down to is this: Touché.
Banned from Arrowhead Pride... and Music City Miracles certainly don't like me very much, either.
"Ah act the way ah feel." --Elvis Presley
by StrangeBroP25 on Jan 16, 2010 8:38 AM PST up reply actions
"a defense like the jets
Back out the two Bronco games that were split; and it’s a 5-2 record. It’s a simple trick — you have to score more points than the other team; or they have to score more against us. Anything is possible in a playoff game, but JETS winning is a low probabiltiy. Anyone know the Accuscore simulation prediction?
by San Marcos Landlord on Jan 16, 2010 9:39 AM PST reply actions
"a defense like the Jets"
Answered my own question. Chargers are winning 68% of the simulations
by San Marcos Landlord on Jan 16, 2010 9:43 AM PST reply actions
Good defenses......
Yeah….good defenses beat good offenses…..win superbowls, etc….
Someone should informed the Colts of that axiom.
TBF...
The Colts defense really came through in that game. They stuffed the run early, and while they eventually started coughing up the rush yards, it only came after they’d built a lead. We Chargers fans can only hope for our defense to put out an effort like that; if they do (we know they can), it’ll be a rout.
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Jan 17, 2010 7:14 AM PST up reply actions

by 























