Catching Up On Richard Seymour News
With just two and a half days until the San Diego Chargers start their season in Oakland against the Raiders, everyone has their eye on this Richard Seymour saga. It seems this story has gotten even stranger overnight, and depending on who you're believing Seymour could still play in Monday night's game. He may not be a difference maker, but not having him out there gives the Bolts a distinct advantage.
A complete run-down on what has transpired thusfar, from the trade up to today, is after the jump. I'll add in my two cents on the matter along the way and keep this post as updated as possible with breaking news.
Sept. 6 - The Raiders trade their 2011 first round pick to the New England Patriots for Richard Seymour, who has one year left on his current contract before becoming a free agent. The move is mocked around the league, but it fills a hole that the Raiders need filled to contend for anything in 2009. New England took advantage of Oakland being in a bad situation.
Sept. 7 - Reports come out that Richard Seymour is "fuming mad" about being dealt from the NFL's model franchise to the NFL's laughing stock, which also happens to be on the other side of the country from where him and his family have built their lives.
- It's first reported that Seymour has no-showed in Oakland when the team was expecting him to be out there.
- Tom Cable tells the media that he's talked with Seymour, and Richard has assured him he wants to be in Oakland playing for the Raiders.
Sept. 8 - Day two of Seymour watch and still no news. Adam Shefter later explains that New England is essentially done with this deal and it's Oakland's responsibility. With the NFL signing off on the deal, and Seymour being added to Oakland's 53-man roster, there's really nothing that Oakland can do except beg.
- For the first time, money is mentioned. Is Seymour just waiting at home until he can get a long-term, lucrative deal from the Raiders? It makes sense. They've already lost their first-round pick and they desperately need him on the defensive line, why not milk the situation for all it's worth? Also, much the same way other superstars have become devalued after playing in Oakland (Randy Moss, for one), I'm sure Seymour is concerned about what type of money he'd get as a free agent next season.
Sept. 9 - A league source says that the Raiders, with Seymour still not showing up, have brought up the idea of sending Seymour back to the Patriots and getting their first-round draft pick back if he does not report. Sorry guys, not going to happen. The silliness of it all is that the Raiders sent a first-round draft pick, which almost nobody trades for anything less than a superstar in their prime, to a player that the Patriots do not want on their roster. Whoops.
- Adam Shefter, who seems to have a mind-boggling knowledge of the NFL rulebook, states that Seymour being on the Raiders 53-man roster against the Chargers means he will still receive a game check of $216,764.71. Not bad for sitting at home and doing nothing.
Sept. 10 - The Oakland Raiders reportedly sent a letter to Richard Seymour giving him five days to show up and take a physical, otherwise he will be suspended for the 2009 season. This means two things. 1) If he doesn't show up, he won't get that game check. Seeing as how the deadline for the 5 day letter in Monday before the start of the Raiders week 1 football game, if Richard is not in Oakland for the game he will not get paid at all this season. 2) If Seymour decides not to show up, not only will he be ineligible to play in 2009, but he will still contractually be obligated to play for the Raiders in 2010 for the same amount as his 2009 salary.
The "five-day letter" binds Seymour to the Raiders officially, meaning the Roger Goodell couldn't overturn the trade even if he wanted to at this point.
Sept. 11 - In typical Raiders fashion, the team denies sending Seymour a five-day letter. Greg Papa, who let the news slip, says that he misunderstood what had been told to him and the team had only been discussion options.
- The Boston Herald confirms that Richard Seymour received the Raiders five-day letter, the one they said they never sent, on September 10th.
- The NFL Network reports that the Raiders have placed Richard Seymour on the Reserve/Left Club list. This is essentially the same as a season-long suspension, however the Raiders were supposedly not able to suspend Seymour until Monday.
Sept. 12 - Just past midnight, big news for Raiders fans.....
According to Adam Schefter of ESPN, the Raiders and Seymour are "in the final stages" of planning his arrival in Oakland.
He is expected to fly to California as early as Saturday, and he could play in Monday night's game against the Chargers.
So it appears Seymour will report, and could possibly play against the Chargers, and the controversy is over. Wait a second....
- The NFL Players Association has filed a grievance on behalf of Richard Seymour, stating that the Raiders do not have the ability to threaten him with a "five-day letter". While this may not keep him from reporting to Oakland today, if he thinks he could sit at home and negotiate himself to a large deal without facing the penalty of suspension he may go right back to Massachusetts.
Sept. 13 - Richard Seymour has talked with the Boston Herald this morning, confirming that he is on his way to Oakland to report.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
“Can’t stand Seymour either. Can’t stand him. He ugly.” – Marcus McNeill
"Football is a physical sport, sometimes you have a disagreement on what's going on, and you have a discussion about it." Kris Dielman
by Brian (DaBolts) on Sep 12, 2009 8:04 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Internet trash posing as news
Please stop. Or learn to read your sources better. Raiders bring up idea of sending SEymour back??? Read the source you linked, it was the “league source” that brought it up. Also, the 5 day letter does not mean he loses his one week salary if he’s not in by monday’s game, he’d lose that regardless of the letter. Please leave news to real reporters, I understand this is a lost cause but I’m trying….
As long as a player is on the 53 man roster, he gets paid that week’s salary. So if the letter had not been sent, and Seymour did not report but was on the 53 man roster, he would still get his game check. At least according to ESPN’s Adam Shefter.
Since many Chargers fans comes to this site looking for updates on the Chargers, and their opponents, I feel it’s my responsibility to keep them up-to-date on what’s going on. However, I did not report these stories and have never called myself a reporter. I’m just a guy recycling news. If you don’t like it, nobody is forcing you to be here.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Sep 12, 2009 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions 4 recs
Good Grief
The league source said “the Raiders will want to retrieve their draft pick, if Seymour doesn’t show.” Now we can quibble over whether the league source got this from Raider management direct or it is his opinion, but you’re just picking the flecks out of fly shit by that point. This is an overview of a pretty hacked up trade with conflicting information and John did a job laying out the timeline and linking his sources.
As for the game check, if he doesn’t show up he doesn’t get it, right? Isn’t that all that was said? As I read it, it is just laying out the two things that happen if he is a no-show; not necessarily as the result of the letter.
1) If he doesn’t show up, he won’t get that game check.
I’m not sure who did what in your corn flakes this morning, but you come off as an incredible pedant here.
"Football is a physical sport, sometimes you have a disagreement on what's going on, and you have a discussion about it." Kris Dielman
by Brian (DaBolts) on Sep 12, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Nobody here miraculously decides to fabricate information...
We are only presenting information that has been released…As you of course know, we don’t have control over what other “reporters” in the media release. If you get up in arms over what we compile, take your ludacris claims to the original author.
Formerly Blount#9...
Idiot trash posing as clever.
Please stop. Or learn what a blog is. Read the title of this article, then decide if your little tirade is founded. John is providing us with a synopsis of the dealings, because many of us aren’t players union lawyers and this situation is fairly confusing. This article is only as accurate as the original sources, so unless you have better access than the reporters or a conflicting article, I suggest you pipe down, I understand this is a lost cause but I’m trying…
This blog has devolved into UT like, uncerebral blabber
The internet sneaks up on people
“Kingsnake” must work for ESPN.
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this blog is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on our souls.
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Sep 12, 2009 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions
According to Kirk Morrison's twitter
“Seymour is on the way”
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this blog is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on our souls.
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Sep 12, 2009 2:03 PM PDT reply actions
He's got two days
to learn a completely new defense. Even if he plays on Monday, I seriously doubt he’ll have much impact.
Plus from what I’ve read they want him to play end. Seriously? A guy who weighs over 300 pounds, you want to play end in a 4-3? Good freaking luck with that.
Greg Maddux for manager.
by Zach (maestro876) on Sep 12, 2009 3:05 PM PDT reply actions
Bad Blood with Seymour
“Richard Seymour is a dirty, cheap, little pompous [expletive],” [Nick] Hardwick told reporters after the game[last year in January.] “But Richard Seymour is the biggest [expletive] I’ve ever played.”
Nobody seems to bring up the Chargers angle that Nick Hardwick and Marcus McNeil hate Seymour. Hardwick accused Seymour of being a Raider before he was ever a Raider with “head slapping” and “foot stomping.”
This seems to be at least as interesting of a subplot as Seymour practicing swim moves on his backyard oak trees to keep in Raider “football shape.”
At least Al Davis isn't running my team's drafts.
by bringbackbuddytrees on Sep 12, 2009 9:13 PM PDT reply actions
He must be terrible, because Nick Hardwick seemed like the nicest guy on the team.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Sep 13, 2009 4:33 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't care for Seymour
But I feel sorta sorry for the way that his POS coach treated him. Send a guy to Oakland with no warning? That’s like taking a crap in the punch bowl at his b’day party.
FWIW, he won’t have much impact on Monday night’s game. I could see him coming in during obvious passing downs & maybe even getting a sack, but nothing significant.
Oh … and Kingsnake …. piss off.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
by Buck Melanoma on Sep 13, 2009 6:24 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
It's a business
I read somewhere the day after the trade that Seymour suspected something was coming. I get the feeling Belichick told him “We’re paying you a lot to keep you as a back-up, so we’re going to see if we can’t find you a better situation somewhere else.”
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Sep 13, 2009 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions
What kind of goodwill is left with the Raiders?
This failed trade is just another example of how completely broken down the franchise has become. Usually teams actually talk to a guy & his agent BEFORE a trade to make sure they can get the long term deal / contract restructuring the team is looking for – but not the Raiders.
I really don’t know what to expect next out of Oakland…
Their team showing up late to the game and having to forfeit like a bush-league softball team?…
Getting the electricity shut off at the stadium because they failed to pay the bill?
…
Forgetting to put air in the footballs before the game?
How bad is this gong to get? How do they come back from all this crap, without the rest of the teams, players & agents trust in the rationality and continuity in the leadership of the team? This train just continues to wreck.
I do not blame Seymour for not wanting to be a part of that. Pull a hammie and do an IR check-out Richard.
What's the problem?
Isn’t this taking the 2010 draft out of Al Davis’s hands? Seymour is much better than a wasted draft choice on Heyward-Bey type.

by 




































