Bolts From The Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

Breaking Down the Football Outsiders' Almanac Chargers Prediction

If you haven't read by now, the Football Outsider's Almanac (created by the fine folks over at footballloutsiders.com), has given the Chargers an overwhelming DVOA score, and gives us an 87% chance of finishing the regular season with 11 or more wins.  (The 11+ wins category is the high end of the range; they don't put a percentage on how likely a team is to win 12, 13, 14, 15, or 16 games.)

 

Without committing flat-out plaigarism of their proprietary information, I want to analyze the reasons why they predicted what they have, review some of their few negative comments, and sound off on whether or not another publication predicting a Super season for the Chargers is truly a distraction and detrimental to the Chargers' success.  All of that after the jump.

Star-divide

So let me just get this out of the way right now: I'm biased.  I've been a fan of the Chargers since 1981, and have been a season ticket holder since I moved to San Diego in 2002.  I'm also a big fan of Football Outsiders and thier statistical analysis.  I've been following them since 2005.  So I'm going to be hard-pressed to argue against their prognostications.  But what I want to do here is provide a breakdown to those of you that have either not read the article and are wondering what the heck Kevin Acee is talking about, as well as give those who have read it a place to talk about it with other Chargers fans.

The first thing important to understand about their prediction is that they see the Chargers as a 10-win team from last season.  They're giving us the Ed Hochuli game, and attributing one of our other difficult last-minute losses (might as well just call it "Carolina" and be done with it) to variance--a fancy term statisticians use for "luck".  When you look at it that way, it's not hard to think that the Chargers can improve by a single game going into next season.  But they give us a ton of reasons.

First, while they don't say that LT will come back to the numbers we saw in 2006, they do say that he's not washed up just yet.  They see him having a productive year, including catching passes out of the backfield.  Of course, that makes a great segue into the passing game, which they believe is an unmatched strength for the Chargers.  While they don't come right out and say that the Chargers' pass attack will become even better, they do comment that their pass attack was one of the best in the league, and that was with an oft-injured Antonio Gates, who played hurt most of the season.  While I'm not sure that Gates' return to 100% health will necessitate a better passing offense (unless we have more overall offensive plays, Gates is going to take away receptions from someone, not simply have his added to the mix), I do think the chances of our offense taking a dive is hard to fathom.  (Barring an injury to Rivers, of course.)

The best thing about the prediction is their ability to see that the defense was not what we were used to last season.  While they note that we were not ravaged by injury last season, they know that the quality of the player who was injured is just as important as the quantity.  Of course, we're talking about Shawne Merriman.  They don't seem to think that Ron Rivera's defense will make a big difference compared to Ted Cottrell's (based upon statistical analysis between the games in which they headed up the D), but they do see a major positive effect accompanying Merriman's return.  As we all hope, if Merriman comes back healthy, the entire defense should play at a higher level.  (Personally, I think they're way off with their assessment of Rivera versus Cottrell, but that's just one man's opinion.)  They also take into account Cromartie's bum hip, and say that even a modest improvement (not one that matches 2007's incredible numbers) would make the defense that much better.

The best part is that they don't even spend any time discussing the special teams, other than to briefly give kudos all around, nor our easy schedule, which includes playing the rest of the AFC West 6 times.  The only real negative they come up with is Norv Turner.  They mention his track record of not being able to get his teams to play up to their statistical standard--apparently, he's always fallen short of his expected win total based upon the statistical evaluation of his teams' performances.  They even mention what you might come to expect in January: Norv Turner versus Bill Belichick, Mike Tomlin, or Jeff Fisher, and who you might be willing to trust to outwit who in such a case.  While I can understand this reasoning to an extent (and kudos to them for backing it up statistically), Norv has already beaten Jeff Fisher in the playoffs (see 2007, Titans vs. Chargers Wild Card game), and went toe-to-toe with Belichick in the 2007 AFC Championship game with many of his best offensive weapons either hurt or out of the game entirely.  While I won't claim that Norv is a flawless gameplanner, I do believe that he has done a solid job in the post-season--probably better than I expected.

Overall, looking at the schedule in late July / early August, I have the Chargers going 13-3, with their 3 losses coming on the road against Pittsburgh, the Giants, and the Titans.  But in reality, this team could pretty much fall on their face again and still walk away with the division.  The real determining factor of the Chargers success in 2009 will not be whether they go 11-5, 13-3, or 15-1.  Unless they find themselves in Miami in February, I think all involved would deem it a falling short of expectations.

Of course, what I find really amusing about this prediction is all of the backlash surrounding it by the majority of fan commentary.  Is it really a problem if someone else thinks that the Chargers are Super Bowl bound?  Honestly, I have no problem with high expectations, especially from a fan base.  Here's the bottom line of it for me: is it going to hurt any different if we lose the in the playoffs based upon someone else's prognostications?  Did losing the 2007 AFC Championship Game hurt more because we thought we were going to the Super Bowl back in August of that year?  It didn't for me.  It's the same no matter what.  So let's enjoy a little high hopes before pre-season even kicks off, what do you say?

So that's my first fan post!  I hope you all enjoyed reading it, and will leave a comment or two for me.  Either way, thanks for reading!

This FanPost was written by a member of the Bolts From The Blue community and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bolts From The Blue editors or SB Nation.

5 recs  |  Comment 12 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great first post.

Rec’d.

"Football is a physical sport, sometimes you have a disagreement on what's going on, and you have a discussion about it." Kris Dielman

by Brian (DaBolts) on Jul 31, 2009 6:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you.

I also think that Turner is a decent-to-good playoff coach. He out-did Tony Dungy twice and Jeff Fisher once. As you pointed out, he did very well against Belichick.

Either way, he’s a far superior playoff coach to Marty.

Love we shine like a burning star
We're falling from the sky tonight

by Zach (maestro876) on Jul 31, 2009 6:42 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It's funny, I used to be a huge Marty supporter

Never would I have thought that I would convert to a Norv fan. And really, I’m still not sure that I am. But the evidence clearly shows how much more effective Norv is than Marty in the post-season. I used to think that it was just some really bad luck for Marty, but we’ve definitely had a large enough sample size to debunk that. Perhaps there’s something to be said about playing at such a high emotional level throughout the season, and the effect it has on the team in the post-season. Regardless, I’m perfectly comfortable with Norv at the helm, especially in the playoffs.

by hablodepablo on Jul 31, 2009 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

pythagorean wins

The metric FO (and others, it’s not proprietary) use to evaluate coaching is “pythagorean wins.” Baseball stat guys found, and the FO guys confirm for football, a strong statistical correlation between the difference between points scored and allowed (point differential) and number of wins. Multiplying the differential by a fixed value (thus generating a number of “pythagorean wins”) seems to predict numbers of wins. As with any statistical series, pythagorean wins exhibit variance; statistics do not predict individual cases. One theory about the variance found in pythagorean wins is that it is a sign of coaching; teams with good coaches win more games than other teams with similar point differentials, bad coaches win fewer games than similar teams.

Turner has one of the lowest pythagorean win ratings of any active head coach (IIRC from the 2007 Prospectus). But pythagorean wins is a VERY crude measure—it’s a very abstract statistical rendering of something that’s really impossible to quantify.

by lawdjayee on Aug 4, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still prefer Pythagenport…

Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken

by Richard Wade on Aug 4, 2009 7:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice first post!

Kudos

I’m in your camp on the Rivera vs. Cottrell question. IMO, there is no comparison. While it’s true that the loss of Merriman undoubtedly hurt the team, Cottrell’s “bend but don’t break” mentality is a BS way to play football, particularly for this squad. This defense is at it’s best when in attack mode – just ask the DB’s who tried to cover receivers for an extended period of time while no pass rush was being generated. Again, this was partly due to the loss of Shawne, but Cottrell did nothing creative to adjust for that loss.

You’ll see at least a 2 game swing from Rivera’s defensive mindset alone.

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!

Robert Hunter

by Buck Melanoma on Aug 1, 2009 4:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The only knocks on Norv...

… are that he’s a better coach when he has some time to think, and that he’s not a great motivator.

I think the motivation thing is probably accurate, but not really relevant with regard to the Chargers. Given mediocre talent, I agree Norv’s team will underperform: the Raiders developed a culture of losing under Turner, and the Redskins weren’t good or motivated enough to get the job done on their own (at least not reliably), and they’d run out of gas at the end of the season. That’s not the story here. This team is loaded with great leaders and great players. They’ve had two “down years” in the last five, but even in those, they managed a 17-15 record and a playoff win. So he’s got some insulation against motivation problems and some cushion in case they arise. Evidence of this can be seen by the Chargers’ exceptional December play these last two years (yeah, they won all their December games in ‘06 too, but you could see them running out of steam towards the end). Compare that to Norv’s Redskins, and you’ll see what I mean.

If I remember right, Norv won’t be personally calling plays this season. It’s not unlikely (though far from certain) that the end result will be that the Bolts will benefit from the monster 2nd halves and crazy big plays we’ve come to expect, without the predictable, listless opening drives we’ve come to dread. Then again, it could just lead to confusion and timidity… knock on wood that it’s the former. I suspect they’ll have the kinks worked out by the end of preseason.

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Aug 1, 2009 1:55 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Turner will still be calling the offensive plays

as far as I’m aware. What he will have is Chudzinski helping him create gameplans and manage the game. That will help with things that have hurt us in the past, like clock management and challenges, and give Turner more time to focus on the game itself.

Love we shine like a burning star
We're falling from the sky tonight

by Zach (maestro876) on Aug 1, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

This is what I recall as well

There’ s really no point in Turner coaching a team if he’s not calling the offensive plays.

Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.

by Wonko on Aug 2, 2009 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Plus it's not that unusual.

From what’s been reported, about a third of the HCs in the league call the offensive plays, a third call the defensive plays, and a third call neither, and just game manage.

Greg Maddux for manager.

by Zach (maestro876) on Aug 3, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe that Chud will make a big difference

on the sidelines in the game management aspect. Frees Norv up more to do the things that he is best at – probe the opposing defense & find plays that result in strong offensive momentum.

I for one am very excited to see Chud back in the fold. Combine that with Norv not having to fret over the defense & I believe that you’ll see an even more explosive offense this year.

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!

Robert Hunter

by Buck Melanoma on Aug 8, 2009 5:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

good article

First, good job. Hope you write more. My take on norv is that he is too much “old school”. I think his philosophy is we are going to beat you physically. which is fine for a weaker opponent. But, when matched up against an equally talented team, you have to be able to out think them, out manuver them, take them by surprise. But, norv just runs the same plays over and over again. I’m not talkin about becomming a “trick” team, but having a surprise up our sleeve when needed. sometimes in a close game, one or two plays makes the difference. Last year, we were the ones being fooled by “trick” plays. For example, roethlisburgers punt in they playoffs. The only reverse I remember seeing us run last year was the final game against denver, and it worked. we need to be more imaginative this year. IMO.

by irishlad on Aug 6, 2009 10:35 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

E-mail: boltsfromtheblue@gmail.com
Call or Txt: 760-515-BFTB (2382)
Start posting about the Chargers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
So we sign Marcus Mason?
Small
Gates to be on Pros vs. Joes
Picture_009_small
So We got our Wish!!!
Small
Running backs combine results!
Small
Chargers could have 5 1rst round picks and 5 3rd round picks
Small
The Phinsider needs your help with a Raider
Dontpanic_small
Proj. RB Speed Score Update
Images619_small
Roster Needs
Marshall_small
On LT...
Picture_009_small
History Will Show That L.T. Was Not The Problem!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Managing Editor

Chargershorse_small John Gennaro

Assistant Editor

Pomeranian_of_war_small Richard Wade

Graphic Designer

Johnnycashsleeve_small QuesaDiaz