LaDainian Tomlinson's Mileage
During the 2008 season, LaDainian Tomlinson scared the crap out of me. I know the Chargers team is stacked at just about every position, but the running back position is crucial to the success of any team. With the Chargers and LT, who is already a first-ballot Hall-of-Famer, there was a sense of denial that I think put the team in deep holes during several games. Norv Turner kept calling for 21 to do something: juke a linebacker, make a huge cut that opens up a hole, outrace everyone down the field, etc.
However, all the Chargers got from LT last year was an undersized straight-line runner that couldn't take a hit. Was it because of his toe injury that he couldn't cut and didn't have a second gear to run away from the secondary? Maybe. Was it because of his groin injury that he wasn't able to contribute anything in the playoffs? Perhaps. The answer to that question doesn't matter. At this point a healthy Tomlinson may be just as good as we remember him being, but because of the beating he's taken throughout his career I think he's going to continue battling more injuries unless we take away some of his carries.
Click through to find out if LT is the most overworked running back in the NFL today and maybe in recent history. Also, what does history tell us about RBs like LT? Will he get better or will he get worse?
Before I get into it, I'm going to break down the simplest of stats. Rushing attempts. Did you ever play "Kill the man with the ball" is school? Different regions of the country have different names for it, but basically you catch a ball and run away from a group that's trying to tackle you. Then, when you're worried about someone taking your head off, you throw it to someone else and start chasing them. Running backs don't have the luxury of throwing the ball to someone else. The second the ball is put into their hands there can only be three outcomes: touchdown, run out of bounds, get hit. That third outcome is the most likely and the most prevalent. So the more rushing attempts a running back has, the more their body takes a beating. The more you get hit and the older you get, the less chance you have of taking those hits and being able to play the next game.
Still, at the age of 29 and in his 8th year as the starting Chargers running back, LaDainian Tomlinson finished the season ranked 6th in the NFL in number of rushing attempts. It was the lowest number of rushing attempts he's ever had in his career, but it was still far too many. Let's compare the miles on his body with the rest of the top 10.
2008:
| Att | Yds | Avg | Yds/G | |
| Michael Turner | 376 | 1,699 | 4.5 | 106.2 |
| Adrian Peterson | 363 | 1,760 | 4.8 | 110.0 |
| Clinton Portis | 342 | 1,487 | 4.3 | 92.9 |
| Matt Forte | 316 | 1,238 | 3.9 | 77.4 |
| Ryan Grant | 312 | 1,203 | 3.9 | 75.2 |
| LaDainian Tomlinson | 292 | 1,110 | 3.8 | 69.4 |
| Thomas Jones | 290 | 1,312 | 4.5 | 82.0 |
| Jamal Lewis | 279 | 1,002 | 3.6 | 62.6 |
| DeAngelo Williams | 273 | 1,515 | 5.5 | 94.7 |
| Steve Slaton | 268 | 1,282 | 4.8 | 80.1 |
Career:
| Att | Yds | Avg | Yds/G | |
| Michael Turner | 604 | 2,956 | 4.9 | 39.4 |
| Adrian Peterson | 601 | 3,101 | 5.2 | 103.4 |
| Clinton Portis | 2,052 | 9,202 | 4.5 | 92.0 |
| Matt Forte | 316 | 1,238 | 3.9 | 77.4 |
| Ryan Grant | 500 | 2,159 | 4.3 | 69.6 |
| LaDainian Tomlinson | 2,657 | 11,760 | 4.4 | 92.6 |
| Thomas Jones | 1,949 | 7,815 | 4.0 | 59.2 |
| Jamal Lewis | 2,399 | 10,107 | 4.2 | 82.8 |
| DeAngelo Williams | 538 | 2,733 | 5.1 | 60.7 |
| Steve Slaton | 268 | 1,282 | 4.8 | 80.1 |
Pretty shocking, huh? Tomlinson has more career rushing attempts than anyone else in the top 10. The best comparison on this list is Clinton Portis, but Tomlinson is ahead of him by over 600 rushing attempts (about two full seasons). Would you want Clinton Portis as the focal point of your offense in two seasons? He's already starting to battle nagging injuries constantly and will probably start missing games because of those injuries soon.
Another part of this equation is size. Typically, larger running backs can take more of a pounding over their careers than smaller running backs. Although throughout his career he's performed admirably as a "goal line back", LT is not a large running back. Tomlinson is listed as being 5'10" and 221 lbs. So let's find some of the best comparisons to LT in terms of rushing attempts and size.
| Att | Yds | Avg | Yds/G | |
| Warrick Dunn (5'9",180) | 2,669 | 10,967 | 4.1 | 60.6 |
| Edgerrin James (6', 214) | 2,982 | 12,121 | 4.1 | 86.0 |
| Willie Parker (5'10", 209) | 1,155 | 4,989 | 4.3 | 76.8 |
| Brian Westbrook (5'8", 200) | 1,247 | 5,721 | 4.6 | 57.8 |
| Thomas Jones (5'10", 220) | 1,949 | 7,815 | 4.0 | 59.2 |
| Clinton Portis (5'11", 205) | 2,052 | 9,209 | 4.5 | 92.0 |
Against the best comparison turns out to be Clinton Portis, but I'm trying to look towards the future. Does LT stand a chance of recovering? Since he's ahead of Portis, that comparison is of no help to us. Dunn spent his years with TB with Mike Alstott, who took so many of the big hits for Dunn that it knocked him out of football, so that may not be the best comparison. Still, you'd be hard-pressed to find a team that would want to make Dunn their feature-back these days. Edge is a good comparison, but a scary one at that. James came to Arizona, who didn't have the best offensive line, with 2,188 carries and has not been real successful in proving that he's still capable of being a feature-back in the league. I know where we might be able to find a hopeful comparison....
| Att | Yds | Avg | Yds/G | |
| LaDainian Tomlinson (5'10", 221) | 2,657 | 11,760 | 4.4 | 92.6 |
| Emmitt Smith (5'9", 210) - through 8 seasons | 2,595 | 11,234 | 4.3 | 90.6 |
Well that'll work for a comparison, won't it? Roughly the same size, same amount of carries in the same number of seasons, same number of games, same age (LT is a year older), same averages. That worked out nicely. Emmitt even had a similar drop-off in his numbers in his eight season. This makes for a great comparison because unlike Edgerrin James, Emmitt remained behind a great offensive line later in his career. So....the million dollar question....how did Emmitt perform after that eight season?
Quite well, actually. Smith made the Pro Bowl in his ninth and tenth seasons, rushing 300+ times in each of them and collecting over 2,700 yards to go along with his 24 touchdowns. He had three more productive, but not great, seasons after that with the Cowboys before playing two disappointing seasons with the Arizona Cardinals.
So health will determine this after all. Emmitt Smith was one of the healthiest running backs in the history of the NFL, even in his later years, and Edgerrin James is not. Time will tell which route LT and Clinton Portis travel down as they hit this crucial part in their careers. All I know is, I wouldn't risk putting the weight of the world on LT's back and knees. There's a dropoff in talent between Tomlinson and Gartrell Johnson for sure, and because of that I understand why people are so hesitant to want Gartrell to get a lot of carries, but I'm willing to bet there's no dropoff between an injured LT and a healthy Gartrell. For that reason, I'm hoping that the Chargers see what's going on around the NFL and take the initiative to extend LT's career and make their offense more dynamic at the same time.
Add-On: The UT's LT tracker is fun to play with once you figure it out. I can now spout out facts like in 2008 Tomlinson only had 5 rushes for 25+ yards and only one of those was a touchdown (at the end of the first Oakland game). This calls for more posts about LT stats.
Do you have any thoughts about Bolts From The Blue? Any tips you want to send our way? Whenever you have something to say, don't hesitate to e-mail me directly.
14 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice breakdown...
Here’s a few things I would add to the Emmitt vs LT comparison:
- Age difference. In Emmitt Smith’s eighth season he was 28, LT is 29 at his eighth. One year of age can make a difference in a RB’s ability.
- Preservance. LT ran out of bounds more so it may have preserved his “RB-life expectancy.”
- Advanced training. Training now-a-days is far more advanced than the training of Emmitt’s days along to go w/ the supplements and healthcare they utilize.
- Not just all about the run game. As we all know LT has put more mileage receiving than the average RB.
LT – 510 rec. for 3801 yds
ES – 435 rec for 2434 yds
Which leads me to another comparison. When you think about a pass catching RB that has also had success running…the first person that comes up in this age is Marshall Faulk. Marshall is listed as 5’10" 211 lbs….very similar to LT. Here is a stat comparison between the two in their first eight seasons:
MF – 2,155 att. for 9,442 / 548 rec for 5447
LT – 2,657 att. for 11,760 / 510 rec for 3801
While the numbers are different in both statistical categories, the total amount of yardage on their legs are very similar. Here are the total yards added together:
MF – 14,889
LT – 15,561
A difference of only 672 yards.
After Marshall Faulk’s eighth season he drastically declined in literally every category and eventually leading up to his retirement four years after.
by Hellsbells51 on May 27, 2009 7:55 AM PDT reply actions 3 recs
WOW
Absolutely fantastic. I definitely should’ve looked at Faulk. That just about crushed all my hopefulness, but it brought me back to what I originally thought anyways so it’s probably closer to the truth.
Rec’d
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on May 27, 2009 7:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Thanks...
I hope LT isn’t done. I still think/hope he can put one maybe two good 1,000 yd seasons up. Just like the other guys below mention…Faulk and Emmitt ran a lot of mileage on turf. There’s a lot of things we can get into, but it usually leads to your point of after eight seasons a RB usually wears downhill.
Also, I’m not too much of a blogger…I mostly stay on the easy stuff (commenting on signonsandiego)…what is a “rec?”
by Hellsbells51 on May 27, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions
I've also heard that college wear and tear is important
I’ll take a look at this if I get some time today, but it would be interesting to look at the these back’s college workload and see if that may have contributed to an early demise. Maybe not since all three came out as Juniors (I think), but I know Marshall won the rushing title as a freshman, so he had 3 years of heavy duty use in him by the time he went to Indy.
by Stephen (shaynes41) on May 27, 2009 8:08 AM PDT up reply actions
Didn't think of that
I know LT played all 4 years at TCU, only starting in his junior and senior seasons, but since they had no offense besides him he ran the ball A TON. I can’t find old college stats anywhere to back that up though.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on May 27, 2009 8:37 AM PDT up reply actions
If we are comparing LT to Emmitt
Then we are comparing next year’s Chargers team to the ’98 & ’99 Dallas Teams (10-6 & 8-8). Troy Aikman, Moose Johnson, Rocket Ismail, Michael Irvin, Flozell Adams, Larry Allen, Nate Newton.
LT has some but not all of that. They took away his full-size full back and gave him a sawed-off full back. Hester could be a good player some day, but he will NEVER come close to being as good at full back as Lo Neil was, and still is. LT does not have the beef up front of those cowboy teams. And while we might make some comparisons between Aikman and Rivers, we have no one any where close to Michael Irvin type talent.
Emmitt had that level of performance because of the team around him. I don’t think our current Chargers compare favorably to those Dallas teams.
Agreed
Those Dallas teams had monsters on the offensive line. While I like our Oline this year, some of the spots can’t be rated higher than a C+. I think our WR depth outweighs Irvin’s singular impact (and I am a huge Irvin fan). Gates is better than Novacek. It’s actually a very interesting comparison if you go position-by-position. Maybe I’ll try it one day. But I think the Cowboys would win out, and they should! They were a dynasty.
You’re dead-on with the FB situation, but I think the Chargers weren’t sure how many good years he had left and didn’t want to find out the hard way. If we lost any of our RBs, like Sproles, to injury I think Tolbert would take over at FB and Hester would move back to HB. He’s better there, there’s just no room for him. He’s a better FB than a lot of the ones in the league though.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on May 27, 2009 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions
I think LoNeal was let go
because he was a one-trick pony rather than because he was too old. Granted, he was very good at his one trick, but watching him try to catch balls out of the backfield was an exhilarating experience. And the two carries he got a game were more of the 2 yards and fall down variety.
Having a fullback who is a threat to catch or run as well gives your offense an added dimension. It is one more potential mismatch to try and take advantage of. I think the coaches were willing to take a hit in the lead blocker role if it meant they could get a little more in the pass catching and running roles.
Of course it didn’t work out so hot because Tolbert and Hester struggled with lead blocking which caused LT to not trust them. So even when Hester got the hang of it near the end of the season, LT wasn’t taking advantage of it. Plus, Hester took a while to become an effective runner/pass catcher. So, while I approve of the theory, it wasn’t implemented very well and it put a big damper on our running game.
We’ll see how it shakes out this year. I think LT will trust Hester a little more and I believe Hester will fulfill the running/pass catching role much better this year.
by Stephen (shaynes41) on May 27, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah Lo Neil’s one-trick was getting his half back the rushing title
IMO that is the fundamental goal of any full back
by Trendsearcher on May 27, 2009 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Be he LT or Eddie George.
People forget about those Eddie George years, but Neil was also blocking for George during his heydey, which was the heyday immediately before LT’s. Which means that, basically, Neil has ALWAYS blocked for the best RB in football, no matter where he happens to be playing.
DannoE
"You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one."
Agreed
I almost forgot that this was their reasoning because of how things shook out during the season. This was also the main reason for drafting double-threats like Hester and Tolbert. I too hope that it works out better this year, with yet another weapon on the field rather than someone trying to play Neal’s role.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on May 27, 2009 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions
LT runs mostly on grass
Marshall Faulk’s career was shortened by running on that synthetic turf the Rams have in their stadium and correct me if I am wrong but I believe most of the stadiums in their division had artificial turf … LT’s legs run on grass at home and in the AFC west.
God willing … LT should have at least 3 good seasons left in him.
Didn't Emmit
play all his home games on turf as well? It didn’t seem to affect his career numbers too much. It’s an Interesting comparison between the three Emmit, LT and Marshall.
Do or do not. There is no try.
A healthy LT still contributes greatly
There’s no doubt that age & the mileage that has been put on LT’s body is taking it’s toll & will continue to force him into a decline. Still, I don’t think that you can rule out the importance of LT’s training regimen nor the heart that he brings to the game. He wants that rushing record & a championship – 2 HUGE incentives.
In 2009, I see LT having a stronger year than 2008. PR’s continued emergence & a very good WR unit will help to take pressure of off LT. Of course, that should also lower the number of rushing attempts that he gets but I believe will help to spring him for more big runs.
Outside of health & age, the 2 biggest threats to LT will be the performance of his FB & OL. If they pick their game up, LT gets back to 1400+ yards & 15-20 TDs.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter

by 



































