Rundown of the Chargers Potential Impact UDFAs
Every year we get a UDFA who makes an impact. Who is it going to be this year? One of the main reason a pretty set team like the Chargers can sign 18 UDFAs is because all these kids know they will be given an honest shot at being the next Dielman, Gates, or Cooper. No one wants to look through 18 guys who didn't get drafted, so let's look at a few of these guys and see if we can find some who seem like they might make an impact:
Darry Beckwith, LB, LSU
6-0, 242, 4.79 in the 40
Projected around the 5th round, some projections had him as high as a 3rd rounder. This guy is going to make the team and will probably make an impact. He is a pretty good friend with the WR Byrd who we drafted in the 7th round (the guy in the hospital). Good run stopper, might have some trouble in coverage.
Compares To: GARY BRACKETT, Indianapolis -- Beckwith is a smart, instinctive inside ruin stuffer, the type you want dealing with "inside trash" to free up other quicker defenders, but he lacks range and pass coverage skills to be exposed there as an every-down type of player. He's had several knee issues that will see his stock drop, and unless he gets into a system where his outside men can compensate for his deficiencies, he will be nothing more than a situational player.
nfl.com
more below
C.J. Spillman, FS, Marshall
via media.scout.com
6-0, 197, 4.50 in the 40
Projected to be a 5th rounder or so. Good athlete, good tackler, doesn't play as fast as his times. His dedication to football has been questioned. He is a very good athlete and if he can pull it together, he could be a good project at the Safety position.
Positives: Solid free safety prospect with adequate size and good speed. Good backpedal, stays low and shows quick feet. Has fluid hips and short-area quickness to handle man coverage when needed. Can make a play in the air, high-pointing the ball. Comes downhill to hit receivers coming over the middle. Closes quickly on ballcarriers from the deep defensive backfield. Willing to take on fullback block to force play inside. Forces fumbles by putting a shoulder on the ball or stripping after the ballcarrier is held up. Gunner on special teams due to his size, speed and toughness.
Negatives: Will take false steps on play-action, but recovers adequately. Willing to hit a receiver off the line, but doesn't always use his hands to win the physical battle. Doesn't get off receiver blocks often enough. Must improve his hands for making an interception. More of a hitter than a form tackler, although he can wrap up on occasion. Will freelance, losing discipline to stay deeper than the deepest receiver.
nfl.com
Kory Sperry, TE, Colorado State
6-5, 238, 4.77 in the 40
Pass catching tight end who really will need to work hard in order to play on the line in the NFL (rather than in an HBack role). I suspect this guy is one of the reasons we released Chandler today.
Positives: Lanky, athletic build with room for additional muscle mass without a significant loss of quickness. Versatile athlete capable of lining up as a traditional tight end, H-back or even split out wide. Good initial burst to get off the snap. Gains a clean release off the line of scrimmage due to quick hands and agility. Good straight-line speed to challenge the seam. Natural receiver. Big, soft hands to make the secure catch. Rare body control for a player his size. Can contort in space to make the difficult grab. Can track the ball over either shoulder. Good quickness off the snap to get to the second level as a run blocker. Has the lateral agility to remain square to the defender in space.Negatives: Only lined up in the traditional three-point stance half of the time and may struggle to make the transition to a more traditional pro-style offense. Inconsistent effort as a blocker, ducking his head too often in space and lacks the physical strength and technique to contribute much in this area. Relies on his athleticism, rather than sound route-running, to get open. Has to prove he's 100 percent recovered from the torn ACL that limited him to only two games in 2007.
nfl.com
Dan Gay, OT, Baylor
via static.nfl.com
6-4, 308, 5.41
Converted DL who played every position on the line but center. Versatility. Dielman was a converted DL as well... Also, reminds me a little of a 300 pound Will Smith.. That's gotta count for something.
Positives: Aggressive. Attacks his opponent. Long arms, which he uses well to pop the defender. Good hand placement. Can latch on and take the defender for a ride when he keeps his feet moving. Strong hands and can drive defenders off the ball. Versatile. Has started games at all four exterior positions along the offensive line. Durable. Leaves with 34 consecutive games started.
Negatives: Top-heavy. Bends at the waist too often. Good upper-body strength to latch on, but doesn't keep his feet moving and is forced to lean on the defender. Defenders too easily slip off his blocks or force him to hold. Lacks the speed to consistently get to the second level and is forced to lunge at defenders.
nfl.com
So there you have it, 4 who might make an impact. I think of our crew of 18 UDFAs, 1-3 will make the team. I think Beckwith is one of them right now, so there are maybe two others who will make the team. This is actually one of my favorite parts of the Draft weekend. All these guys with chips on their shoulders getting signed for a pittance and trying to prove everyone wrong. As stated elsewhere, I'm a little disappointed we didn't get an RB with some potential. Curtis Brinkley may prove me wrong, hopefully he comes in angry and in shape. We got some WRs with some potential, but I don't think we have any spots for a WR, but you never know.
1 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
Fast Run Stuffer
I was really disappointed last year with how the Chargers backers filled gaps and holes. OL, FB and TE held them off two or three yards which led to the big gains. “You Can’t Run” died last year (maybe APs 300 killed it earlier.) Without Merriman, other than attitude, the Chargers were missing athleticism and speed, the NFL is a speed game that’s why OSU LBs typically suck. I really like Beckwith and thought we should have drafted him, a quick LB who will jolt to fill the hole instead of waiting to be blocked and fast enough to deal with coverage in small zone gaps.
As a Cal fan, I love Anthony Felder. Probably the least heralded of Cal’s LBs, probably the most blue collar. Led team in tackles and played in one of the few 3-4 systems in college. After giving up like 30 pts a game, switched to 3-4 after D-coordinator spent summer with Dick Lebeau and was one of the best run-defenses in country and gave up like 15 pts a game (including shutting down USC and Mark Sanchez (what a joke that guy will be, he wet himself getting drafted) – D sole reason Cal had a winning record. Solid if unspectacular and smart. Heres link with more about Felder.
At least Al Davis isn't running my team's drafts.
by bringbackbuddytrees on Apr 28, 2009 4:39 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I know this is a Charger board
But quit your USC hating. I’ll spare everyone else a potentially long diatribe about Cal.
"I bleed powder blue." - Antonio Gates
by matto619 on Apr 28, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Spillman vs Osgood
If Spillman can be the new Special teams ace, Osgood could be out of job. Not a lot of teams looking for 4th string WRs with speed and average hands.
Beckwith has a real good shot at making the club. Helps that they didn’t draft an ILB.
If 3 of these UDFA make the club, which guys are getting cut or which draft picks won’t make the club? I think the first 4 picks make it but after that, it will be a fight.
by L Magico on Apr 28, 2009 10:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Spillman
He may be an Osgood replacement, but I see him as competition for Gregory. Gregory was a big special teams guy, but was a real liability (although he showed progress last year) on defense. I can’t recall who is the gunner opposite Osgood. It used to be Milligan a couple years ago and I want to say it was Gregory last year, but maybe it was Cletis Gordon. If it was either of those two guys then Spillman has a real shot to beat them out and make this team.
Also, Osgood is still under contract so for all his bitching about getting traded or starting, as long as he can still play ST I still see him on this team. And I think I’ve heard A.J. either say or hint at the same thing.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Apr 28, 2009 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
speaking of special teams aces
Wopamo Osaisai, CB, Stanford, another of our UDFAs was actually an All-Pac10 special teams player. I didn’t even know they had such things! Apparently his specialty is the gunner position.
I don’t think we have room for more than two players who are special teams only with no future potential to start or contribute on offense or defense. One of those players is the enviable David Binn and the other has traditionally been Osgood. I think the only way Osgood is replaced in his current role is if one of these other guys can contribute at a similar level to Osgood on special teams and offers some starter potential down the road, which Osgood does not (according to AJ)
by Stephen (shaynes41) on Apr 28, 2009 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Great info too. Osaisai’s size and skills as a CB tell me that he would not be able to contribute there. Honestly I think all of these special teams players are being brought in just in case Osgood is traded (or injured) or if Sproles has contract issues (or is injured). Does anyone know if Sproles ever signed his franchise tag offer? I know after LT restructured there were lots of rumors that Sproles was still unsigned.
This could also be leverage, which I know I always bring up but it’s true. If one of the guys we drafted or signed shows great skills as a returner, AJ might be more willing to remove the franchise tag from Sproles instead of giving in to his demands.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Apr 28, 2009 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sproles has not signed his tender
I know he wants the long term deal, but I’m a little surprise he hasn’t signed. It’s a lot of money and there is still good pressure on the Chargers to sign a long term deal.
The LB in Seattle who had the franchise tag had it rescinded after Seattle drafted a LB. He is now a free agent after all the FA money has been spent. I didn’t realize a team could rescind the franchise offer, but apparently they can. If I was Sproles I would sign that offer and work out the long term deal later.
by Stephen (shaynes41) on Apr 28, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We usually carry a few
This year Siler, Waters and Gregory were essentially special teams guys except that Gregory had to fill in for injuries and Siler played in goal line situations. In the past we’ve carried guys like Polk, Milligan and Pinnock who had no shot at contributing or starting while still having Osgood and Binn on the roster.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Apr 28, 2009 5:26 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'm sticking to my story
I think Siler Waters and Gregory are all potential guys, that is, as soon as the team thinks they have no hope of starting or being a valuable backup, they will be gone. Not so much with Polk and Milligan, but definately with Pinnock.
Philosophically, I think this is the best way to run your 45 man roster. There is just not enough room to have too many guys who are special teams “specialists”. Counting Kickers and Punters, we’ve got 4 guys who will only play on special teams. Any more than that and I think you start digging into valuable game day backups. Your backups and most of the special team guys should be guys you are developing for offensive or defensive contributions.
by Stephen (shaynes41) on Apr 28, 2009 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eh
You have 22 starters and 3 “required” special teamers (kicker, punter, long snapper). If you have a backup at every position. You still have 7 roster spots (including the 3rd QB who is effectively the 54th man on a 53 man roster, a weird rule). Throw in a 3rd RB, a 5th CB (for facing spreads) and a 5th WR and and you still have 3 roster spots left. Some teams use those for kick/punt return specialists, some have gunners, some have special teams aces (Larry Izzo comes to mind as a guy who wasn’t a gunner but made multiple teams rosters). Maybe some of these 3 spots are taken by guys that have the potential to be solid backups like Siler, Waters, Polk and Gregory, but they don’t have starting potential, and some of them have no hope to be to anything more that special teamers like Milligan and Pinnock. There are definitely roster spots to spare for these guys and taking a lesser special teamer that has a little more potential may cost you. I’ll take a solid gunner over the 9th best linebacker or 5th best safety or 2nd best fullback or 7th best DL on the roster any day.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Apr 29, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh
and I’m actually being generous with the backup spots. Most teams don’t carry 5 backup OL because someone can play multiple positions and a 3-4 defense won’t usually carry 6 DLs either. And, usually one or more of your good special teams guys can play a decent backup role. I don’t think anyone has a problem with Osgood as the 6th WR or Gregory as the 4th S or Cletis Gordon as the 4th CB, but they all probably could have been replaced with better position players who didn’t play ST as well.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Apr 29, 2009 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am not an expert on roster sizes
but I believe the 53 man roster includes the game day inactives and the elusive 3rd emergency QB.
plus you also get 8 practice squadders who don’t count against the 53 man
so, you’ve got a 45 man active roster on gamedays. We’ve got 22 starters and 4 special teams only guys. That leaves 19 backup spots (plus the emergency #3 QB) on a game day. Thats 19 back ups for 22 starters, as well as the variety of “specialy” positions like nickel corner, third down back, or whatever. It’s a little tighter than you are making it out to be. I don’t think there is a whole lot of extra room for someone who is a Special Teams standout but would cause widespread panic if they had to actually play on offense or defense (like Binn at TE would, or to a slightly lesser degree Osgood at WR)
So I’m just saying that, outside of our 4 ST only players, if all the other ST players need to be able to play on offense or defense, you are better off having guys with more potential to start or contribute rather than guys who might be slightly better on ST but have no potential to start or contribute.
by Stephen (shaynes41) on Apr 29, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay
But, getting back to original discussion on Osaisai and Spillman, they are both essentially competing against Gordon (and Hughes) and Gregory who were mostly ST guys who could play a position in a pinch and they were both on the roster last year. The difference between these guys regarding their starting/contributing potential and the new guys is marginal at best. It’s definitely not going to be “widespread panic” if you went to one of these guys (nothing like Binn at TE that’s for sure). So, you end up not needing to worry about extra spots for special teamers because it’s been proven that we can carry them and you can make the decisions based on those spots almost exclusively on their special teams play.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Apr 29, 2009 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who are the four special teams only guys?
Kicker, punter, long snapper, and who else?
by Brendan Scolari on Apr 30, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess maybe your counting Osgood?
by Brendan Scolari on Apr 30, 2009 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok
But he could still be considered a backup WR right?
by Brendan Scolari on Apr 30, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
technically yes,
but he has caught 4 passes over the last three years, so I think he is only slightly more of a WR than Binn is a TE. Osgood might claim otherwise, and he might be right, but 4 receptions over 3 years tells you what Norv and AJ think.
by Stephen (shaynes41) on Apr 30, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sleeper UDFA GREG CARR
I believe that Greg Carr out of Florida State may develop into a starting receiver for the bolts, he was all 2nd team ACC multiple years, and has an impressive build at 6’6!!! Check his highlights…he looks great!
"Its Peanut Butter Jelly Time" is truly an awful song...The Banana suit guy needs to stop dressing up for football games at Autzen...
by Blount#9 on Apr 29, 2009 6:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Carr was the name I kept hearing when the radio guys talked about the UDFAs
At 6-6 215ish he is a big target.
Positives: Tall and very long arms. Tempting red-zone target on fades or jump balls. Able to concentrate most times in the end zone, even making difficult catches in traffic. Quicker feet than expected, as he can get into and out of out routes fairly quickly given his height. Also shows a bit of shiftiness after the catch. Might not be just a deep ball threat. Can adjust to poorly thrown balls, even low ones.
Negatives: Questionable straight-line speed. Gangly build, lacking any upper body strength. Runs with the ball loose. Already not very quick off the line, he may struggle getting off jams from tough NFL corners. Very inconsistent hands, as he doesn’t win as many ball battles as he should given his height. Easy to wrap up or trip up in space. Not much of a threat over the middle. Has the length to block smaller receivers, but is not overly willing and lacks the strength to sustain.
nfl.com
might be a good project guy. Maybe a practice squad guy. I feel the Chargers are full of potential WRs right now and we may not have room for another. Only three short months until camp opens and we get to see what these guys can do.
by Stephen (shaynes41) on Apr 30, 2009 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
























