San Diego Chargers Possible First Round Draft Pick: Chris "Beanie" Wells
Why We Need An Upgrade: In 2008, the San Diego Chargers rushing attack ranked 20th in NFL in terms of yards per game. As the roster stands today, the only change that has been made is the replacement of Mike Goff with Kynan Forney. Although the focus of this team has been moved from the ground game to the passing game, it's important to be balanced and talented at both so that you can win different games with different stategies.
The reasons for improvement are many, but the most important one is victories. A strong defense will keep you in every game, an explosive passing attack will make your offense dynamic and a powerful running game will help seal off victories (and prevent comebacks). There were at least a handful of games that the Chargers should've won in 2008 that were lost because our offense could not stay on the field. That needs to change if we're going to have any hopes of beating the elite teams in the AFC in the playoffs.
Key Stat:
| Rush Avg | Yds/G | Record | |
| SD Chargers (2006) | 4.9 | 161.1 | 14-2 |
| SD Chargers (2007) | 4.2 | 127.4 | 11-5 |
| SD Chargers (2008) | 4.1 | 107.9 | 8-8 |
Why We Don't Need An Upgrade: The reason for not upgrading the position is hope. Hope that Marcus McNeil returns to Pro Bowl form and becomes a tractor on the left side of the line again. Hope that Darren Sproles' performance in the playoffs against the Colts is something he can do regularly if he's given more carries. Hope that the right side of the offensive line improves with Goff departing and that the line improves as a whole with 2008's health issues behind them. Hope that LaDainian Tomlinson returns to his Pro Bowl form with an improved, healthier line and less carries. Hope that Jacob Hester can grow as a FB to become a Lorenzo Neal-type blocker.
The Argument For Wells: Chris "Beanie" Wells not only has terrific potential as an NFL running back, the Chargers' current backfield situation would be perfect for him and he would be perfect for it. Although Tomlinson and Sproles are both talented, using their speed, quickness and hands to create opportunities in the open field, the one piece that's missing is a power back. When he was younger and has less miles on him, Tomlinson could handle the full load. After 2,657 carries in eight seasons it's understandable if his body is not as strong as it once was.
Football gameplans get more complicated each season, but the need for the power back to run up the middle and pick up 3 yards consistently will never fade. Right now, the Chargers do not have that and it's going to make LT and Sproles job much easier if we can get one. Chris Wells has the size, speed (4.59 40 at the combine), strength (25 bench press reps) and proven track record. In watching him play over the past few years he most reminds me of former Ohio State Buckeyes RB Eddie George, who had great success in the NFL with the Tennessee Titans. He's a strong back with good speed, great desire and the patience to find the hole before exploding through it. Splitting carries between him and LT would go a long way towards making our run game more dynamic, more balanced and more capable of keeping the lead in the fourth quarter.
via images.chron.com
via blog.mlive.com
The Argument Against Wells: Chris Wells has been described as "college fast", meaning he can turn the corner at the end of the line and sometimes even break away on a long run in college but NFL scouts suspect he'll struggle to do the same in the NFL. He's not known for being shifty and opts to try and run defenders over rather than making them miss, another characteristic that will not translate as well in the NFL. Wells missed several games during his senior season battling an ankle injury and then suffered a concussion in the Fiesta Bowl, so injuries may be a factor as well. There has also been a good deal of discussion regarding his abilities as a pass-catching running back, since he made only 13 catches during his entire four-year career with Ohio State (8 catches during his injury-shortened senior season).
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
Something bugs me about Wells and Moreno
I just don’t think either is a franchise back and really warrants a first round pick.
by Steve (Grey Suit) on Apr 23, 2009 10:15 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I will not be happy if we take an RB in the first round
It doesn’t qualify as a need pick and I doubt he will be the best available at 16
by Stephen (shaynes41) on Apr 23, 2009 10:18 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I DONT EXPECT A.J. TO PICK A RB IN THE FIRST ROUND...
WE NEED AN ILB TO REPLACE WILHELM AND GIVE COOPER A HAND STOPPING THE RUN. I THINK MAUALUGA WOULD BE A GOOD FIT. ESPECIALLY BECAUSE HE WOULD HAVE SHAWNE MERRIMAN AND THE MATURING SHAUN PHILLIPS MENTORING HIM. IM HOPING HES AVAILABLE AT 16. IF NOT WE SHOULD THINK ABOUT A DE TO REPLACE OLSHANSKY OR MAYBE A SAFETY TO TAKE CLINTON HARTS PLACE. I JUST DONT THINK A RB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN IMPROVING OUR DEFENSE RIGHT NOW.
by DTOTHEC on Apr 23, 2009 11:33 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Welcome to BoltsFromTheBlue
In the future, please try not to comment in all-caps.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Apr 23, 2009 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we draft Wells
I don’t see it as a move to drastically improve the 2009 team. I see it as a way to add a little depth for 2009, to spend some time trying to figure out Wells’ injury issues and how they can manage him in the future and then in future years put the onus on him to become the next big time RB. Because of Wells’ health issues I just don’t see him making a big impact in 2009 without getting extremely lucky healthwise. It just seems optimal for him to be worked into the NFL slowly. I think out of all the backs in the draft he is the one with the best potential to be a franchise RB (whatever that means these days). If we desperately need a RB for 2009 to be competitive this is not the guy I would pick. But, we don’t so I’m slowly coming around to him.
To compare his future to that of the other top backs. Moreno seems like a solid guy who will never see stardom, but could make some pro bowls in the right system. Brown seems like a guy who would come into the NFL make some noise and then be very average by the time he’s 26. Both would be better choices if we needed a starting RB in 2009, but we don’t, so I think I like Wells better.
That being said, I’m not sure I’d draft him. But, I’d probably draft him if I had to choose a RB for the Chargers in the 1st round.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Apr 23, 2009 2:03 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
I was wondering where you’ve been. Then you show up and nail every point I was trying to make. Good to have you back.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Apr 23, 2009 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm around
Sometimes my boss makes me do work.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Apr 23, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reasons not to draft Wells...or RB (for that matter) at #16...
While it may be “hope” as a reason to draft RB, here are more important reasons why we should not go RB at #16:
1) Norv Turner. He is widely known as a QB guy and we have that winning QB under him. RB under a Norv-led offense does not have to be spectacular, but versatile. We currently have that in Sproles and LT (add Tolbert and Hester).
2) LT and Sproles. While yes we need to rely on “hope”…these guys are still unpredictable.
3) There are efficient RB’s later in the draft. I like Donald Brown and Shonn Greene over Wells. Though the two are likely 2nd rd picks (Brown possible late 1st)…I think we can pull off some type of trade to get into the 2nd.
4) Defense. While you point out the Chargers lost a handful of games due to offensive TOP, you can offset that w/ a strong defense. Basically, the defense makes stops…we get the ball back. That was our true weakness.
5) OL. Our OL was the real weakness in the run game…obviously on the run side of the line…the right side. We strengthen this and running SHOULD be no problem. I emphasize SHOULD, because we have to go back to your point…“hope.”
That covers a few things off the top of my head….
by Hellsbells51 on Apr 23, 2009 3:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice points.
I don’t think it would be wise to pick ANY RB in the sirst round, especially with no second rounder for the time being.
by Brendan Scolari on Apr 24, 2009 3:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks.
Yeah, I don’t think RB was most of the problem on offense…it was the weak OL. So this year I think we need to solidify that, first on the offensive side.
I heard AJ has a hard on for Beanie Wells…but it could all be a lure to trade for one of the teams looking to go RB.
by Hellsbells51 on Apr 25, 2009 8:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two Words
1. Rey
2. Maualuga
Our offense was only 2nd in the NFL in scoring. Though being 1st would be a cool stat; I’d prefer if we had some help in causing the opposition to score…..drum roll…..less. Our offense is great, however….we looked like a bunch of cream puffs on the other side of the ball. I am dying to see Darren ‘I Have An Edge On Every Back In The League Because I Was Getting Arm Tackled By Corners In College’ McFadden get pounded into the turf by this guy. I don’t see us going D-line in the 1st Round. I see A.J getting an athletic DT in the lower rounds to fill in Igor’s vacated spot.
Can you imagine him AND Lights on the same squad? QB’s will literally run into the saving arms of Shaun Phillips! lol
by BleedsBlueNgold on Apr 23, 2009 3:38 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















