The San Diego Chargers Franchise Darren Sproles
Darren Sproles had the franchise tag applied to him yesterday. That means at a minimum he will get 6.2 million next year; though the Chargers are looking to lock him down long term. That could mean he will settle for less per year; but undoubtedly more gauranteed. Sproles was certainly a hero in the game against the Colts; but it is easy to forget that he also fumbled at the goal line in that game. Given that the Chargers have taken the plunge; lets take a look at Sproles production last season.
My overall impressions are these; he is much better when the Chargers can get him the ball in space; that's when he is at his most effective. The Colts with their Tampa 2 tend to be easier to run against; and not surprisingly he did extremely well in the playoffs against them. The trouble was that in Pittsburgh against the 3-4 defense he was wholly ineffective; when he runs up the middle he is on the small side to make tough yards. The other thing he brings to the table is the return game; and it is easy to overlook its importance to the Chargers. When trading punts with another team the Chargers tend to pick up yards not only with Mike Scifre's big boot, but also with Sproles excellent punt returns. Sproles ranked eighth in the league for punt return yards at 11.1 and eighth in kick off returns at 26 yards per return. If the defenses force the offenses to punt a few times, the ball tends to creep towards the opponents goal and once Rivers gets a start at midfield he is usually deadly. Lastly is his ability in receiving out of the backfield. He broke any number of screens for serious yards; in fact of his six TDs; five came on pass plays.
Lets take a look at some specific games. He went largely unused in the game against Carolina; but did make a 41 yard kick return. He came back with a vengeance against Denver the next week. Forgotten in the aftermath of referee Ed Hochuli's blown call was a terrific game by the Chargers little big man. He broke off a 103 yard kick return for the TD then followed that up with a 66 yard screen play that also went for the TD and then rushed for 50 more yards for some icing. He had moderate success against the Jets, rushing for nearly 40 yards and catching for about the same. Against the Raiders he didn't do much from scrimmage but busted off a 67 yard return that led to a go ahead field goal. He was largely held in check by Miami with the exception of a 25 yard pass. He had a nice 25 yard punt return against New England; but also sprained his ankle which would limit him over the next few games.
It wasn't until the December 4th game against the Raiders that he would break out again with two TDs through the air. He also had a 67 yard punt return called back for holding. He was not used much against KC; but he was integral to the Tampa win. He turned a screen into a 32 yard Touchdown, made a 44 yard kick return and a 43 yard punt return. Then against Denver he ended up with 115 yards and a TD on the ground and then another TD through the air. Finally he had the fantastic game against the Colts in the playoffs with 300+ all purpose yards and the back breaking final TD. One of the off feild aspects that speaks well for him; Sproles is known for his stutter which he has worked hard on losing; I have a real admiration for how he has fought to overcome that.
There are a couple of down sides in his record though. One is that apart from the Jets; he really only came up big against teams with defenses that were somewhat easier to run on. The other is a propensity to fumble; he had three on the season on one in the post season. Considering how often he touches the ball, that is just too many and needs to stop. He had that reputation early but worked hard and seemed to overcome it last year; it was back last season however.
Lastly you have to wonder about LT and how this fits in with his contract. If Sproles with 300 yards on the ground is worth 6.2 million for the season, how much can of a pay cut can you really ask LT to take at 8.5 million in cap; it's got to have some pride factor. Here is what AJ Smith had to say about LT given the franchise was applied to Sproles. “This has nothing to do with L.T.,” Smith said. “Our intention is to pursue L.T. We assume that at the combine it will pick up speed and there will be some substance to it when we return.” At the end of the day, despite how much the contract costs and questions about how effective he is against tough defenses I have to say it was going to kill me to see Sproles playing for another team; I love that he is still a Charger next season.
0 recs |
2 comments
|
Comments
Non-exclusive franchise tag
The piece of language that keeps intriguing me about the non-exclusive tag is that the original team gets two first-round picks as compensation if the player goes on to sign with another team. That is language is included everywhere in explanations of the franchise tag, but what I can’t find a definitive answer to is: are those first-round picks FROM the other team, or first-round add-ons like compensatory picks? It seems strange that in corresponding explanations of restricted free agency, the compensation always says the picks come from the signing team, but no such explanation accompanies the non-exclusive franchise tag. And in either case, are the two picks mandatorily spread over two years? For example, if the Eagles negotiated with and signed Sproles to an offer sheet, AND the picks come from the signing team, would/could the Chargers get both of their 1st rounders this year, or would it be the team’s slotted 1st rounders over the next two years? If the picks are first-round add-ons, are they two this year or one each of the next two years?
It seems almost certain to me that the picks come from the signing team, like RFAs, and effectively quash any negotiations with any non-exclusive franchise player; but if not then other teams have less disincentive to negotiate with Sproles and getting two first rounders (even at the end of the 1st) for letting him go would be super-brilliant. At the same time, I don’t understand the point of the non-exclusive tag if the picks come from the signing team – no one’s going to give up two firsts just for the privilege of signing another team’s FA, so just have one kind of franchise tag. The original team will gladly pay the incrementally larger average salary if he’s actually worth that much.
by Lenny Suckerpunch on Feb 19, 2009 12:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
This has happened
So I know that you get the team’s picks, not any compensatory picks. Here the LA Times talks about the Redskins getting the Panthers 1999 and 2000 first round picks for Sean Gilbert. Wikipedia shows that in the 1999 draft the Redskins got the Panthers pick (#5 overall, which they traded to the Saints so that Ditka could wear dreadlocks) and in the 2000 draft they got the Panthers pick again (#12 overall, which they traded to the 49ers along with another 1st rounder to move up to #3, which complemented their #2 overall pick which came from the aforementioned Saints/Ditka dreadlocks trade, to become the first team with two top 3 picks).
1-10-DEN 18 (9:52) (Shotgun) 6-J.Cutler pass short right intended for 19-E.Royal INTERCEPTED by 93-L.Castillo (95-S.Phillips) at DEN 18. 93-L.Castillo to DEN 14 for 4 yards (62-C.Wiegmann). 6-J.Cutler pouts ob to DEN 25 for 11 yards.
by Wonko on Feb 19, 2009 1:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















