Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Will Rhymes 'Fine' After Being Hit By Pitch And Fainting

2009 Chargers Pro Bowl Discussion

I figured I'd post this here so we could all talk about which Chargers made it, which ones didn't, and which ones should have. While official announcements haven't been made, we know via ESPN and twitter that both Antonio Gates and Kassim Osgood are in. We also know from Kevin Acee that two more made it as well. Here's to hoping it's Phil and Vincent, as we know both are extremely deserving.

EDIT: Acee just gave it away. Philip Rivers, Gates, Kris Dielman, Osgood, and Nate Kaeding are the Chargers Pro Bowlers.  Congrats, fellas!

Comment 219 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If I recall the early voting returns

I assume one of the remaining Chargers is Dielman.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 3:56 PM PST reply actions  

What about Nate?

I would think Kaeding is deserving as well. Rivers should be a lock. VJ should be there too.

Do or do not. There is no try.

by Clip Show on Dec 29, 2009 3:57 PM PST reply actions  

Rich Eisen tweeted earlier

that there were some “surprising snubs”.

I bet neither Philip nor Vincent made it. I bet your AFC QBs will be Manning, Brady, and Roethlisberger, and wide receivers will be some mix of Reggie Wayne, Randy Moss, Wes Welker, Andre Johnson, Chad Johnson, and Santonio Holmes.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 3:59 PM PST reply actions  

Rec’d.

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Dec 29, 2009 4:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I still can't believe

That he found a woman in the stands wearing his jersey to give a ball to a couple weeks ago. She is either very ignorant or not a fan of her gender.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed, but

Regardless of his off the field issues, pro-bowl is based on “on field performance”. Due to his record setting 21 catches, it’s not a stretch that he made the pro-bowl. I believe this is his first honor?

by SJO on Dec 30, 2009 3:04 PM PST up reply actions  

second

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 30, 2009 5:02 PM PST up reply actions  

I'll give you a guarantee

On Andre and Reggie. The rest I’m not so sure about. I’m surprised to see Ochocinco in the mix though. And it seems like Santonio isn’t considered elite by the masses.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:01 PM PST up reply actions  

In the highlights to open the selection show

they didn’t have a single Charger.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:01 PM PST reply actions  

Acee just gave it away.

Rivers, Osgood, Dielman, Gates, and Kaeding.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:03 PM PST reply actions  

No offense to Dielman

But I’d put VJ in there over him.

Not that it’s going to matter …

by creanium on Dec 29, 2009 4:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Yup.

Dielman is just a popularity/momentum vote now. Vincent was the best receiver in football this year. It’s really too bad.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Third alternate. It’s a bit of a joke.

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Dec 29, 2009 4:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed

My comment was more tongue-in-cheek than anything else

by creanium on Dec 29, 2009 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

There are better players

Marshall needs to be there, Andre johnson needs to be there, Wes welker needs to be there…I guess Reggie Wayne is the only one you scould switch

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

VJ

had arguably the best season as a wideout this year.

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:09 PM PST up reply actions  

It's not arguable.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:10 PM PST up reply actions  

To some people it looks like :-p I think he’s been the best.

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd swap out Marshall

Andre, Reggie and Wes need to be there. Marshall needs to be picking up trash by the highway.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Marshall doesn’t need to be there nor does Welker.

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Dec 29, 2009 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I need to lay off the crack. Welker belongs.

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Dec 29, 2009 4:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Nice to see

Rivers on that list. The fact he was over looked last year was ridiculous IMO.

by SoCalBoltFan on Dec 29, 2009 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Rivers is the #2 AFC quarterback

ahead of Tom Brady.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:04 PM PST reply actions  

Five Chargers selected as alternates as well

Darren Sproles, wide receiver Vincent Jackson, punter Mike Scifres, left tackle Marcus McNeill and cornerback Antonio Cromartie

by creanium on Dec 29, 2009 4:05 PM PST reply actions  

thats good at least

where did you find that info?
just wanna take a look at the list

Life is like riding a bicycle, to keep your balance, you must keep moving.-Einstein

by cameronm on Dec 29, 2009 4:33 PM PST up reply actions  

thanks

Life is like riding a bicycle, to keep your balance, you must keep moving.-Einstein

by cameronm on Dec 29, 2009 4:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Scifres was caught behind Lechler, right?

Mr. “I-Outpunt-My-Coverage-Every-Damn-Time, But-All-Of-Them-Run-4.2s-So-It’s-Cool”?

I don’t think the above would fit on a jersey, but if it did I would wear it.

Banned from Arrowhead Pride... and Music City Miracles certainly don't like me very much, either.

"Ah act the way ah feel." --Elvis Presley

by StrangeBroP25 on Dec 29, 2009 10:32 PM PST up reply actions  

There's nothing Scifres can do

to make the Pro Bowl.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:06 PM PST reply actions  

Break Lechler's legs?

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Play on a crappier team.

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Dec 29, 2009 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

At this point he might as well start treating his annual snub as a badge of honor.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Dec 29, 2009 5:12 PM PST up reply actions  

None of this will matter...will it?

Since the Chargers will be playing the weekend after the Pro-bowl anyway, right?
I am just saying…

Do or do not. There is no try.

by Clip Show on Dec 29, 2009 4:06 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

Scifres is in a bad spot...

Chargers don’t punt nearly enough to get him the stats

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:07 PM PST reply actions  

High scoring teams have that problem

Philly has a great punter in Sav Rocca, a former AFL player, but he doesn’t get enough punts because of the Eagles offense and David Akers.

Angels 2010: We need a starting pitcher, not a kneeless hitter!

by Slyintine on Dec 29, 2009 6:14 PM PST up reply actions  

The AFC wide receivers

Andre Johnson, Reggie Wayne, Brandon Marshall, and Wes Welker.

Never mind that Jackson has been better than all of them this year.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:07 PM PST reply actions  

Yup.

Better than every receiver in the NFL this year.

Just because Marshall catches a lot of 3-5 yard passes doesn’t mean he’s that great.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:09 PM PST up reply actions  

I saw a stat on Xmas

87% (something like that) of passes VJ catches result in First downs.

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Jackson: 58/68 Receptions are for first downs; 85.3%

Marshall: 56/101 Receptions for first down; 55.4%

Dinking and dunking

by creanium on Dec 29, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

YES.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks for finding the stat.

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

He is the MVP of the Broncos, imo

The offense there runs through him. He has single handedly won at least two games for the Broncos

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Good for him.

It doesn’t make him better than Jackson.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:11 PM PST up reply actions  

He’s the 25th most productive receiver in the NFL. 38th on a per play basis. He has no business being in the Pro Bowl. Malcom Floyd has been better in both categories.

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Dec 29, 2009 4:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes

Very much so.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Jackson, by far, has been better

Jackson: 68 receptions for 1,167 yards and 9 TDs; 17.16 YPC; One in every 7.5 receptions for a TD

Marshall: 101 receptions for 1,120 and 10 TDs; 11.09 YPC; One in every 10.1 receptions for a TD

by creanium on Dec 29, 2009 4:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Marshall is all alone

He can expected heavy coverage on every play and still gets all those completions. He set the single games receotions record. He has too be there, 100 recept. with a game to play.

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

blinded

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Rec'd

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:15 PM PST up reply actions  

x2

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:15 PM PST up reply actions  

The better stats are available to everyone

It shouldn’t be about stats anyway. It should be about production.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 30, 2009 5:03 PM PST up reply actions  

in Marshall's favor

he is putting up very impressive numbers with have Kyle Orton throwing him the ball…

KYLE freaking ORTON !!!

but I still think VJ has had a better year (but not by a lot)

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Dec 29, 2009 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

25th in DYAR and 38th in DVOA is not that impressive.

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Dec 29, 2009 4:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Orton is ok. He's not the PR Machine, but he's not awful.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Dec 29, 2009 5:15 PM PST up reply actions  

VJ isn't even the best receiver on his team

Gates is a better receiver than VJ, and draws more of the defensive coverage from VJ. I think VJ should be there, but not over Marshall.

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Marshall

sucks!

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Gates and Jackson

have made almost equal contributions to the Chargers this year. Jackson slightly more. They both have been the best at their respective positions this year.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Without Gates Jackson gets crapped on all day with double teams

Which teams do to Marshall and he STILL gets all the catches he does. How is Welker better than Marshall then? Marshall is all alone and can serve as both a short yardage guy and a deep threat, this argument is silly.

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:17 PM PST up reply actions  

But his catches aren't as useful

And he’s not much of a deep threat.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

It's because the Chargers have other weapons and threats

That they don’t have to force the ball to Jackson when he’s double-teamed.

by creanium on Dec 29, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Without gates

There is Floyd, Naanee, Sproles, and tolbert. We have more options then those two.

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

And they have

Royal, Graham, Sheffler, Stokely and Gaffney. Those guys are really chopped liver.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

*aren't

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

You really want to open that can of worms

Gates is one of the greatest TE of all-time. Period. So he instantly makes it easier for the rest of the offense. Anbd yeah, I’ll take our guys to those old bums in Denver.

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Gates being great doesn't make Marshall any better

Andre Johnson has no one else in Houston, but he’s produced better than Marshall. The Broncos had the best running game in the NFL in 2008 and Marshall still couldn’t put in an above average performance.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not saying

you’re wrong about VJ being better than Marshall. However, you’re saying some people are blind but you’re being kinda VJ fanboish with your arguments now. To say our receiving core hasn’t made life tons easier on VJ is silly. Of course it has, much more so than Denver’s receiving core has made life easier on Marshall.

Marshal is dealing with a mediocre passer (who has a hard time with the deep ball, so of course his receptions wont be as deep), a mediocre passing core (besides him) and decent running. With that he’s still put up close to equal numbers as VJ, who has an excellent deep baller, an amazing receiving core besides him, and a decent running game (in our last 5-10 games).

Marshall is arguably better than VJ. ARGUABLY. It’s hard to say he shouldn’t be there over VJ. Just like it’s hard to say VJ shouldn’t be there over him.

by ArksnBolts on Dec 29, 2009 7:10 PM PST up reply actions  

+1

In a war of extremes, the neutral ground is usually the most correct

by DanTails on Dec 29, 2009 7:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Marshall is not arguably better than VJ. At least not in the sense that arguably means “capable of being argued plausibly.”

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Dec 29, 2009 7:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Wonko likes the Chargers

but his arguments are not based on being a fanboy. He just believes in the methodology and logic behind a few stats like DVOA and DYAR. And by those metrics, VJ is ranked way ahead of Marshall.

by HuangDi on Dec 29, 2009 7:43 PM PST up reply actions  

As are a lot of other WRs in the NFL

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 30, 2009 5:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Well

If Chargers players are participating in the Pro Bowl then there’s a good chance Wayne or Welker would need to opt out.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:10 PM PST up reply actions  

By what criteria?

You can look at him and say you think he’s the best, but Jackson has produced more this year than either of them.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:16 PM PST up reply actions  

He didn't say most productive

He said best.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Andre might be more productive too

He has more yards per game, and more explosive plays of 20 or more.

by AirNorval on Dec 29, 2009 4:20 PM PST up reply actions  

DVOA

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Or any world that isn't based on short yardage receptions that don't get 1st downs.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

10 yards?

Have you heard of 3rd and 3 or 2nd and 7 or….

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:26 PM PST up reply actions  

No

I’m arguing that VJ will get the first down more often than Marshall will.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

He's arguing that it will.

Jackson makes the 4 yard catch on 3rd and 3. Marshall makes the 4 yard catch on 3rd and 10.

Which is more valuable?

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I guess it depends on who is coaching

Marty would think both are good, 4 yards forward is 4 yards forward

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

The point we're trying to make

is that Marshall makes a lot of meaningless catches. He’ll catch a 5 yard pass on 3rd and 8. A 6 yard catch on 3rd and 14. He racks up a lot of receptions that way, but a substantial number of them are meaningless.

Jackson, meanwhile, has at least 87% of his catches go for first downs or touchdowns. That’s more valuable and thus more productive than Brandon Marshall.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

That isn't meaningless.

It’s meaningless when it’s short of the sticks on 3rd or 4th down. And he has a lot of those.

He also has a lot of catches that, while not on 3rd or 4th down, are still very short. 1-3 yard pick-ups on 1st or 2nd and 10 aren’t nearly as valuable.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

That actually is a success using the stats we are talking about

45% on first down
60% on second down
100% on third down.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

No, in a world where first downs count as first downs

As pointed out above:

Jackson: 58/68 Receptions are for first downs; 85.3%

Marshall: 56/101 Receptions for first down; 55.4%

Dinking and dunking

by creanium on Dec 29, 2009 4:27 PM PST up reply actions  

So not only do more of VJ's catches result in first downs

But VJ actually has 2 more first-down receptions than Marshall, with 33 fewer catches

by creanium on Dec 29, 2009 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Look at the stat that creanium posted

85.3%(VJ) of catches for 1st down > 55.4%(Marshall)

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

The world

that doesn’t depend on raw numbers where a guy can catch 100 balls for 3 yards each and get declared a hall of fame receiver.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

95, 1500 yards for Andre Johnson

And that is less productive than 68 for 1170

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

He was thrown at 162 times

VJ only 108.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions  

So based on %s

VJ catches 3% less catches thrown at him than AJ

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:27 PM PST up reply actions  

4% more actually

VJ’s catch % is 63%
AJ;s is 59%.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Marshall's catch % is the same as VJ's, by the way

NOT arguing for Marshall OVER VJ.

Marshall’s drops are certainly his responsibility, but how do we know that his productivity’s being less than VJ’s isn’t significantly due to the schemes his offense is running versus those ours is?… Not to mention the schemes the defenses run against him versus those run against the Chargers and VJ.

If an NBA team double teams Kobe Bryant and he jacks up a high number of shots anyway, making a low percentage, rather than passing out of it, that’s on him…. If he passes the ball out of it and his passes don’t result in direct assists, he has (for him) a low scoring night, and the team wins anyway, it doesn’t look like he did much (relatively)…. Maybe not the best parallel….

Maybe the guys at FO acknowledge the shortcomings of their stats better than anyone else:

“We cannot yet fully separate the performance of a receiver from the performance of his quarterback. Be aware that one will affect the other.”

“These statistics measure only passes thrown to a receiver, not performance on plays when he is not thrown the ball, such as blocking and drawing double teams.”

I might add that they don’t take into account when the WR gets thrown to when HE’S being double-teamed either (whether he catches it or not)….

Again, I’m not saying Marshall should have been in over VJ; in fact, I would have voted for VJ.

But just because the very good DVOA stats say that VJ’s the most productive receiver and that Marshall’s #25 doesn’t mean that VJ’s the best receiver in all of football and that Marshall’s the 25th best. I know no one here is saying that either, but while there may not be a better way of measuring these things at this point, as the FO guys themselves acknowledge, these stats can’t take everything into account.

by jctess on Dec 29, 2009 9:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Marshall's currently #14 in the AFC

according to these stats. In terms of how they measure productivity. Of course. ;)

by jctess on Dec 29, 2009 10:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Production is not a direct reflection on skill and ability

Sure its good, but its not direct. Like I’ve been saying about Marshall, he gets all the attention, and so does Johnson, so they have less production. But they makes a ton of play even when teams check down on them all the time. Andre Johnson is just crazy though

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

But shouldn't the Pro Bowl be about production

Not ability?

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:20 PM PST up reply actions  

The number is stupid

Because the production from that number doesn’t back it up.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:22 PM PST up reply actions  

And then there's the fact that he's a horrible person

Which makes it worse.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow Wonko

You go from numbers to calling the guy a bad person .

Classy

by AirNorval on Dec 29, 2009 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't respect people that beat women

sorry.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Im sorry I thought this was a football board

And dont make me pull up a quote from you a day or two ago, when you said something like “I listen to the police blotter only so I know if a guy can play”

Im paraphrasing of course

by AirNorval on Dec 29, 2009 4:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Marshall shouldn't be playing

I almost added to that quote something about him. People that are a threat to others should be addressed. Tiger was not a threat to others.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:55 PM PST up reply actions  

How many convictions has he had?

If we’re opening up the character bag of worms, VJ hasn’t exactly been a saint either.

by DanTails on Dec 29, 2009 6:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Drunk drivers

are certainly threats to others

by Chilango on Dec 29, 2009 9:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Not in the same regard

As a man who beats on the people he claims to love or prevents them from running off by beating a car with a baseball bat.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 30, 2009 5:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Drunk driving can be pretty damaging to

cars and lives…

I know it is in our culture to apologize for drunk driving because it is so widespread, but there really isn’t much that separates VJ and the douche that killed these people but luck.

by Chilango on Dec 31, 2009 11:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Just because

His girlfriends are too abused to prosecute, doesn’t make his actions any more forgivable or less violent.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 30, 2009 5:06 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Wow.

That’s like, totally backwards.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Receptions are good

But yards are better?

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Quality

over quantity my man.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Welker makes meaningful catches.

For him, his large number of receptions are meaningful and productive.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Welker was more productive than Marshall

His productivity is second only to VJ this year. Marshall was waaaaay farther down the list.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Marshall is not the only guy on the Broncos with talent.

As Wonko just pointed out.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Thank God

they didn’t leave out Phil this year. That would have been criminal.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:17 PM PST reply actions  

True that.

I kind of wish there was a way Schaub could get recognition, but not at the expense of our guy.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Is he an alternate?

he should be.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

It's criminial

That he wasn’t included in the MVP discussion, not that i think he will win, but that he isn’t up there.

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

How is he not in the discussion

He’s been in the discussions I’ve heard, but since he won’t win, why discuss him that much?

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:21 PM PST up reply actions  

I should of clarified

A couple weeks back, he was nowhere near the discussion.

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

So lost now

which post are we replying to AHHHHHHHHH

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:29 PM PST reply actions  

Just give up

Admit that the only reason you like Marshall is that he has a gaudy number in a stat that really doesn’t show you the value of a WR.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Isn't that how it should be

On the chargers blog, no matter what? (stat-backing or not)

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

The fanpost

Would get the same comments that have been placed, in this thread. Marshall clearly isn’t as good as VJ.

The one and only AzDuck

by Dude52089 on Dec 29, 2009 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Are you some kind of quisling or what?

Jackson has been more efficient and more prolific in every stat EXCEPT receptions.

Banned from Arrowhead Pride... and Music City Miracles certainly don't like me very much, either.

"Ah act the way ah feel." --Elvis Presley

by StrangeBroP25 on Dec 29, 2009 10:41 PM PST up reply actions  

AND

Except Touchdowns, YAC, and beaten women.

by SJO on Dec 30, 2009 3:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Not if it isn’t true.

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Dec 29, 2009 4:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed.

Anatidaephobia-Fear that a Duck is watching you. Pryor, come January 1st, there will be millions watching you. We are banking on your overwhelming football prowess, blessed Juju.

by CaDuck on Dec 29, 2009 4:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I think VJ is great, and Marshall is as well

But what Marshall has done in Denver is more impressive to me than what VJ has done in VERY different circumstances in SD and therefore I think Marshall deserves the nod more than Jackson.

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Marshall is far from great

This is the first year where his production level has even been above average. I’m still waiting for his boom or bust style to actually help an offense produce.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

What

>300 rec. in 3 yards is f-ing amazing

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

They are effectively unsuccessful running plays most of the time

300 carries is a good season, not a good 3 years.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Jackson has a career average of 17.2 ypc

with WAY fewer catches. Jackson is more productive.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:42 PM PST up reply actions  

The problems come from the balls he doesn't catch

mixing in with the ones he does. And the drive killing that happens when he can’t break tackles to get a first down and the team has to punt, or it forces them into 3rd and long or whatever. You have to use those catches to help the team. Marshall consistently in his career has been unable to do that.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Basically

What I’m saying is that if teams threw at their receiver as much as the Broncos throw to Marshall the other WRs would be much more productive in their styles than Marshall is, just based off of the numbers Marshall has put up over his career compared to everyone else.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Ahh screw it

You can have this round Wonko. I still think Marshall is a good pick and I will still feel righteous indignation for a Charger not getting picked, but I think the voters got it right this year. VJ needs more catches.

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:45 PM PST up reply actions  

This isn't about a Charger not getting picked

I’ll go to the mat for almost any WR in the league getting picked after Marshall. Marshall is just not a productive WR.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:46 PM PST up reply actions  

That's all well and good when it comes to Team MVP voting

But for who the best in the entire league is? It’s hard to overlook the production and efficiency of Vincent Jackson

by creanium on Dec 29, 2009 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

I would love to keep arguing

but my wife isn’t going to drive herself home from work. Catch you all later tonight.

"I aim to misbehave." - Mal Reynolds

by Zach (maestro876) on Dec 29, 2009 4:40 PM PST reply actions  

Why not?

Gender equality or no? Make up your mind, wimmins!

Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you? ◔ヮ◔
Uncommon Sportsman :: Absurdity in play

by Axion on Dec 29, 2009 4:46 PM PST up reply actions  

No Marcus Mcneil?

that sucks, he was having a pro year.

Reppin SD (Z-G)

by BFTB_zach on Dec 29, 2009 4:45 PM PST reply actions  

OLine in the pro bowl

Is kind of a weird picking system. It’s more about consistently picking the popular guy no matter the production. It is probably the position where the discrepancy between performance and getting picked is highest.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:47 PM PST up reply actions  

You can blame Dielman for that one

But I think McNeill has had a better yeaear from week one to now.

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 4:46 PM PST up reply actions  

hell yes

Philip Rivers left side was very well protected he shouldv’e been a pro bowler

Reppin SD (Z-G)

by BFTB_zach on Dec 29, 2009 6:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Did Osgood deserve it?

I am not even sure if he outperformed Tolbert on Special Teams for the Chargers this year.
Its always good to see Chargers make the Pro Bowl and nice to see a fair number of alternates as well.

by JeromeB on Dec 29, 2009 4:51 PM PST reply actions  

Based on my perception

The most productive ST players this year have been Osgood And Hester.

by SoCalBoltFan on Dec 29, 2009 4:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Hester had the one big play

and has been useful on special teams, but I would be surprised if he has half the tackles on special teams that Tolbert has.

by JeromeB on Dec 29, 2009 5:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Actually he has made two big plays on STs

The first one was the strip against the Steelers that lead to a TD. And the Blocked punt against the Cheifs that lead to a TD. How many TDs has Tolbert scored on ST this year?

by SoCalBoltFan on Dec 29, 2009 5:52 PM PST up reply actions  

BTW

Tolbert has 15 tackles and 6 assists. Hester has 8 tackles and 1 assist so your point is valid. I just think Hester’s two STs TDs outweigh the 7 more solo tackles that Tolbert made.

by SoCalBoltFan on Dec 29, 2009 6:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Not trying to Bash Hester

Just throwing out the idea that Osgood may not be the most valuable special teams player of the Chargers, much less deserving of a pro bowl selection as the best special teams player in the AFC.

by JeromeB on Dec 29, 2009 8:10 PM PST up reply actions  

I love Osgood

But I agree, from a purely physical stand point (tackles and turn overs), he may be equal with Tolbert and Hester. However, he is the most intelligent special teamer I know of, as evidenced by his sniffing out the fake punt a few weeks back before the coaching staff did. That level of knowledge and the leadership he brings with it are difficult to measure. I pray that Tolbert and Hester have been good students of KO, cause when he’s gone their play making ability and the remnants of his smarts will be wicked together.

by sd_Baby-B on Dec 29, 2009 10:39 PM PST up reply actions  

AJ needs to lock up VJ

Chargers offense mismatches are predicated on Gates and VJ both needing double teams and Rivers making the right decision. AJs locked up Rivers and Gates but VJ needs to get done before he keeps getting more expensive. I assume we’ll lose Malcolm although he’s pretty loyal.

At least Al Davis isn't running my team's drafts.

by bringbackbuddytrees on Dec 29, 2009 4:51 PM PST reply actions  

Bengals won their division

And are Pro Bowler free.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:56 PM PST reply actions  

How does that work exactly?

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 4:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Who would you have included from the Bengals?

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Dec 29, 2009 5:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Leon Hall maybe?

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 5:01 PM PST up reply actions  

How many corners make the team?

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Dec 29, 2009 5:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't know

Truthfully, I haven’t analyzed the rosters.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 5:02 PM PST up reply actions  

3 apparently

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 5:03 PM PST up reply actions  

It would

but pro bowl is not about the logic apparently.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 5:05 PM PST up reply actions  

I just wonder

If a division winner has ever not had anyone make the Pro Bowl before.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 5:01 PM PST up reply actions  

You could argue for Benson over R. Rice.

I guess.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 5:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Naw

If Benson was healthy, he would’ve taken MJD’s spot.

Look at Ray Rice’s yards from scrimmage. He’s a big playmaker. Cedric Benson doesn’t make many huge plays.

Angels 2010: We need a starting pitcher, not a kneeless hitter!

by Slyintine on Dec 29, 2009 6:31 PM PST up reply actions  

More TDs too

Angels 2010: We need a starting pitcher, not a kneeless hitter!

by Slyintine on Dec 29, 2009 6:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Benson is a two down back

That hurt him, as well as his injury for sure. No pun intended

by AirNorval on Dec 29, 2009 6:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I've heard that Kyle Cook has made a big difference at C

Mangold and Saturday are legacy picks there. No one would have cared if he made it instead of one of them. But, like I said, OLineman work funny in the Pro Bowl.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 5:08 PM PST up reply actions  

How is this not entirely moot?

There won’t be any Chargers in the Pro Bowl.

What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders!

by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Dec 29, 2009 5:18 PM PST reply actions  

R-E-S-P-E-C-T

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 5:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Actually

I just like a good debate. It’s a chance to do some learning. But, I imagine others want some Bolt Respect.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 5:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Why are they doing this before the season is over?!

It’s ridiculous. Guys could have standout games in very meaningful games. Other guys could choke or disappear.

by jctess on Dec 29, 2009 5:32 PM PST reply actions  

They started voting before the season was half over. The whole process is stupid.

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Dec 29, 2009 5:38 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Could be worse

Football is the only sport where they even try to wait til the end of the season. MLB, NBA, NHL all-star games are all mid-season.

by riversformvp on Dec 29, 2009 5:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed, but with only one week to go, just wait another week

Okay, so the fans can do their voting the last couple months of the season for their 33%, but everyone else should fill out their ballots after the regular season’s over.

by jctess on Dec 29, 2009 6:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm glad Jackson didn't get voted in.

I wouldn’t want to piss that guy off and now I’m sure he’s is. Jackson is a clutch player. He really started taking off during the playoffs when we made it to the AFC championship game. He’s got a huge chip on his shoulder now and I think he’s going to have a MONSTER post season. He probably would have anyway, but this just gives him extra motivation.
On a similar subject, I HATED to see the Chargers #1 on the SI power rankings. Let’s just slip under the radar and quietly take everyone out on the way to our first SB ring. I have no problem with that. Just win it all!

by SDreal on Dec 29, 2009 5:48 PM PST reply actions  

LOL. Agreed.

I just posted something similar in the “snubbed” thread. Word. I think this will just be FUEL for his VJ’s FIRE in the playoffs. Nobody should ever be snubbed for their hard work but in the long run, this is a good thing.

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Dec 29, 2009 6:50 PM PST up reply actions  

u guys

will be in the super bowl if u keep playing well the only team that can stop u is the refs lol

okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule reseident broncos fan for ap lol

by j-man on Dec 29, 2009 6:08 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


BFTB Apparel Store

Bftbshirtstore_medium

Facebook

Chargers on Twitter


Managers

Paddlin_small John Gennaro

Assistant Editors

Dont-panic-thumb_small Wonko

Pomeranian_of_war_small Richard Wade

Antonio_small creanium

Columnists

Sdclogo2_small Orz

Tn_small Jeff (sliderockmpc)

Wrong_small_small Superduperboltman

Screen_shot_2011-08-05_at_2 jkvandal