Stat of the Day: Young Blood
One of the things I've criticized the Chargers for in the past was not getting enough of an impact from their rookies in Year One. Not because having success in that first year is a tell-tale sign that the rookie will have a production career, but because having a rookie (or several) in the starting lineup seems to invigorate everyone. There's several reasons for this:
- The prideful veteran. NFL players typically believe that they're great and invincible, even if neither is true. They also try to ignore their age, as they know that 30 is like 60 in the NFL. If a rookie comes in, playing their position or a similar position, they are determined to prove that they can outwork, outsmart and outlast the kid who might be 10-15 years younger than them. It'd part personal pride and part worry that drives them to some of their best seasons.
- Getting back to basics. This one is not hard to understand, but it so rarely happens without an impact rookie joining the team. A successful veteran player, like all successful people, has habits. Up to this point in his career, those habits have either helped or at least not hurt him in his job. However, most people play better when they get "back to basics" and play the position the way it should be played. While mentoring and teaching a rookie starter, many times a veteran player will remember something that he was told by a former coach but ignored. Often times the veteran player will try it himself when he sees it working for the rookie. This, more often than not, leads to a better season for the veteran player (who has now developed a new move, and therefore a new passion for the game/position).
- New personality, new roles, new fun. One thing you always have to keep in mind is that these guys are coworkers. Just like your coworkers, they have ones they like and ones they don't like. They hang out during the week and go out after games. If you've ever worked somewhere, or gone to school in an area, where the people surrounding you don't change for a few years you know how stagnant and boring things can get. In those situations, nothing is more fun than meeting a new friend that fits right in with the group and has a bevy of stories, jokes and talents to raise everybody's spirits. A football team is the same way, and a rookie starter has the potential to raise everyone's spirits because they're not out there thinking "I've done thing before." Adding a new piece to the puzzle makes things new, fresh and exciting.
- Young talent helps old talent. Nothing takes the pressure off of a football player quite like another talented football player at another position. Antonio Gates wants to stop being triple-teamed? Vincent Jackson can help with that. Steve Foley wants to stop being double-teamed? Nothing like a stud rookie OLB on the other side of the field. As long as you're not playing their position, veteran players will love you as a rookie starter because it means you have the talent to take some pressure off of them (which obviously the last guy wasn't doing).
So why am I going through all this? See for yourself after the jump.
2009 Chargers Starting Rookies (have started at least 1 game)
- Kevin Ellison, SS
- Louis Vasquez, RG
- Ogemdi Nwagbuo, DT
- Vaughn Martin, DE
- Larry English, OLB
2009 Chargers "New Blood" (first-time starters or new-to-the-team starters)
- Brandyn Dombrowski, RT/RG
- Jon Runyan, RT (starting in the playoffs...probably)
- Ian Scott, DT
- Travis Johnson, DT/DE
- Alfonso Boone, DE
- Kevin Burnett, ILB
- Brandon Siler, ILB
- Steve Gregory, SS/CB
- Scott Mruczkowski, C
- Paul Oliver, FS (2 games in place of Weddle)
I know that second group doesn't seem as important, but it is. Guys like Mruczkowski, Dombrowski, Gregory and Oliver (all switching positions with none or very little starting experience) still need help from the veterans around them, and guys like Scott, Burnett, Johnson, Boone and Runyan are all still learning a brand new defense and bring brand new personalities to the team. A lot of these guys got starts as a result of injuries, but what I'm trying to say is that perhaps this team is better than the Chargers of years passed because they had those injuries and the new guys have come in and solidified themselves as viable starters.
2008 Chargers Starting Rookies
- Jacob Hester, FB
- Mike Tolbert, FB
- Antoine Cason, CB
That's the whole list. Cason starting one game in place or Antonio Cromartie. Tolbert started the year as the starting FB and eventually lost his job to Hester when he was injured. So outside of the FB spot, on a team that was moving away from the running game, there was not a lot of rookies on the field for the Chargers.
2008 Chargers "New Blood"
- Eric Weddle, FS
- Jyles Tucker, OLB
- Tim Dobbins, ILB
- Jeremy Newberry, C
- Steve Gregory, SS
- L.J. Shelton, LT (2 games in place of Marcus McNeill)
2 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
The injuries early changed the mentality of the team
I think it focused everyone on doing their job as best as they could do it because it was the only way to overcome. You couldn’t necessarily rely on your buddy next to you to go above and beyond (like a Merriman or a Williams, etc. would do) so everybody just worked around the assumption that the guy next to you was going to do his job, so you had to do yours. That created both a team mentality and a sort of plug and play defense. Maybe I didn’t describe it right, but the end result is the same. For the most part the parts in the defense and to some extent the offense can change and move around, but the team mentality seems to keep things consistent. That allows for a lot of rookies and young blood to step in and not be a huge issue.
You can see right now how other teams can struggle with the injuries to key guys. The Vikings lost E.J. Henderson and over the last few weeks, they haven’t figured out how to adjust to his presence at MLB no longer being there. Plays that used to get cleaned up by him no longer do and you end up letting Cutler and the Bears beat you. I’m sure you could find examples of other teams that had late season injuries to key guys and haven’t adjusted.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
by Wonko on Dec 29, 2009 10:19 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Eagles just lost their center
Look at our start after having Nick go down. I fully expect it to have a similar effect on the Eagles.
The necessity of having to play new guys unfamiliar with our system is probably most obvious in their mistakes & the consequent results. Another by-product is having to limit the playbook. Many people think that Norv has suddenly changed his mentality, has been holding back on the playbook, etc. While he may have held back a few plays for the surprise effect, & may have some to roll out yet, it’s just as likely that those plays couldn’t be used until our team solidified enough to present the right opportunities.
We’re lucky in the fact that we are on the back side of a very key injury (Nick), had to do our shuffling early, & now have a playoff bye week. While some teams are losing key players just now, we already have them back or have already adjusted to the loss. This is a very key advantage for the Chargers, IMO.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
by Buck Melanoma on Dec 29, 2009 10:51 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
No surprise who leads that category
Josh Cribbs.
Then, Chris Johnson and then our Sproles-y closely followed by Fred Jackson.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
New players aren't always bad
It also depends a lot on the attitude of current players. Some NFL players, be it 3 year vets or 8, are Dbags and don’t want anything that resembles “competition”. If the players on the team are unselfish and team players, then a lot of good can come out of new players.
by Superduperboltman on Dec 29, 2009 12:24 PM PST reply actions
Awesome post, John
And your analysis is spot-on: I think this has a ton to do with the Chargers’ success this year…. And it should put them in a great position going forward, too — to close out the regular season … and then win the games that really matter in January…. And hopefully one in February, too…!
Not sure correlation implies causation here.
Yes, I agree that inserting rookies or new players can change the dynamics of a team. Sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse. For example, there’s no way the team is better with Ian Scott at NT over Jamal. And I will agree that the secondary seems to have gotten better with Hart no longer providing his services for the San Diego Chargers.
I might attribute some of the improvement to the players finally breaking down and buying into Norv’s system on offense and on Rivera’s change of scheme to the strength of his players on the defense. I think that might be more of a factor than the number of new players. Granted, the ‘new blood’ may have been less reluctant to dream about the good old days of Martyball and Wade and, instead, follow the current scheme in order to get playing time. Who really knows what’s going on behind closed doors. I sure as hell don’t.
Anyway… I don’t totally disagree with you. The new players have made an impact and that’s a tribute to A.J. Smith AND the coaching staff. But I think it’s a little bit of an oversimplification to say we’re better this year because we have more new blood than last year.
Not total causation, that's for sure
I agree with all your points; when you’ve got dozens of players in what’s arguably the most intricate team sport of them all, there are a myriad of variables…. You and John have hit on some key ones. There are plenty more, including individual player development at every position, some of which can possibly be explained by things you’ve both mentioned.
The key to this team's success is O-line
Without solid O-line play, the Defesne will get exposed. I just pray no team in the playoffs is going to scheme up some crazy blitz packages that start messing with their heads.
The sort of counter-attack for that
Is all our big receivers. When you get the ball out quick it doesn’t have to be 100% accurate for them to go get it. However, Norv calls so many long developing plays that a new set of crazy blitzes seems to knock the O off track for a series or two.
I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.
Exactly
Rivers is getting better and better at picking that blitzes are coming (and from where); he’s just got to have guys in the pattern who are relatively short down the field and get the ball to one of ’em…. I know a lot of us (ok, pretty much all of us) want to see Malcolm, VJ, and Gates continue to pick up 1st downs nearly every time they catch the ball — and average 15-18 yards per catch, but when the blitz is coming, a completion for 6 yards is (obviously) way better than an incompletion and infinitely better than a sack or, worse yet, a sack and a fumble or an interception….
And Legedu may be much taller and stronger than Wes Welker, but he could still be a heck of a slot receiver; in fact, all these guys, including Osgood, should be great on quick-to-medium-range slants…. We’ve seen some, and we’re starting to see more….
And if teams come with more blitzes, I’d expect … and hope to see more…. If Rivers has a passing lane, and the receivers run their patterns right, they’re almost indefensible when you’ve got the size and skill the Charger receivers have.

by 




















