Checking the Numbers Preview: Chargers-Steelers Week 4 Game
Hello, Bolts From The Blue Readers! Here is a post previewing the upcoming game. It's a statistical comparison of the Steelers and Chargers. If you enjoy this, you can check out similar posts at my site, Checking the Numbers. Many thanks to John for letting me post this here.
This weekend, on Sunday Night Football, we will see what looked like one of the top matchups of the year prior to this season. In another matchup of top quarterbacks, the San Diego Chargers will travel to Pittsburgh to play the Steelers. I'm sure there will be some discussion about Ben Roethlisberger and Philip Rivers being in the same draft class, and many previews will talk about how this is the third meeting in less than a year between these teams. But, to me, the main story is that both teams have struggled early in the season, with the Chargers winning a very close game in Oakland in week 1 and losing to the Ravens in week 2, and the Steelers twice losing second half leads in the last two weeks. While it has become expected almost for San Diego to struggle early in the year under Norv Turner, Pittsburgh has generally started strong since Mike Tomlin has taken over. So, will we see the Steelers get back to their winning ways this weekend, or will they find another way to lose? Or, will the Chargers just play outstanding football and overpower the ailing champs?
Who knows? We'll find that out soon enough. But, perhaps by reviewing the statistics for each team (from Pro-Football-Reference.com) up to this point in the season, we may get a better idea of who will win this game.
For this preview, I have pulled the per game numbers for each team so that we can do a head to head comparison of their respective offensive and defensive numbers so far this year. I also have each team's offensive and defensive ranks in both points and yards after the first 3 weeks. Then, to help give context these numbers, I have the average offensive and defensive rankings of both teams' opponents, again for both yards and points.
First, the head to head comparisons:
| San Diego Chargers | Pittsburgh Steelers | SD - Pit | |
| Offense | |||
| Points | 24.33 | 15.67 | 8.67 |
| Yards | 382 | 346 | 36 |
| Passing Yds | 315.67 | 265 | 50.67 |
| Passing TD | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| INTs | 1 | 1.33 | -0.33 |
| Rushing Yds | 66.33 | 81 | -14.67 |
| Rushing TD | 1 | 0.67 | 0.33 |
| Rush Y/A | 2.8 | 3.3 | -0.5 |
| Fmb Lost | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0 |
| Turnovers | 1.67 | 2 | -0.33 |
| Defense | |||
| Points | 21.33 | 16.67 | 4.67 |
| Yards | 322 | 289.33 | 32.67 |
| Passing Yds | 179.67 | 212.67 | -33 |
| Passing TD | 1 | 1.33 | -0.33 |
| INTs | 1.33 | 0.33 | 1 |
| Rushing Yds | 142.33 | 76.67 | 65.67 |
| Rushing TD | 1.33 | 0.33 | 1 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.5 | 3.8 | 0.7 |
| Fmb Rec | 0.67 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 0.67 | 1.33 |
Per Game Averages So Far This Season
The table above shows the offensive and defensive per game averages for both teams this season. Then, the third column contains the differences between those averages, found by subtracting the Steelers' number from the Chargers' number. San Diego has the edge in most offensive statistics. They have passed for about 50 yards more a game and gained 36 more per game overall. The Steelers have rushed more effectively (surprising to Steelers fans, I'm sure), averaging about 15 yards more per game. But, in the stat that counts, the Chargers are scoring nearly 9 more points per game than Pittsburgh.
Defensively, somewhat to be expected, Pittsburgh has the edge. They have averaged allowing about 33 fewer total yards and 66 fewer rushing yards per game. San Diego has allowed an average of 33 fewer passing yards per game, though. The Chargers' main advantage in this category is in turnovers, where they have forced almost 4 times as many as the Steelers. But, in the category that counts, points, Pittburgh is averaging about 5 points less allowed per game.
Having looked at raw stats, here are team rankings in terms of offense and defense for both points and yards.
| San Diego Chargers | Pittsburgh Steelers | |
| Offense Pts Rk | 8 | 25 |
| Offense Yds Rk | 8 | 12 |
| Defense Pts RK | 19 | 7 |
| Defense Yds Rk | 14 | 8 |
Based just on these rankings, the Chargers are doing a much better job of finishing drives. Only 4 spots separate them in offensive yards rankings, Chargers 8 and Steelers 12. But, the Steelers are ranked 25th in points scored. Both teams' defensive rankings are more consistent. If the Chargers win, it seems likely that part of the reason will be that the Steelers' offense ws settling for field goals instead of scoring touchdowns.
Finally, let's look at their opponents' average rankings to this point in the season.
| 2009 Opponents' Average Ranks | ||
| San Diego Chargers | Pittsburgh Steelers | |
| Offense Pts | 19.33 | 18.67 |
| Offense Yds | 17.33 | 18.33 |
| Defense Pts | 15.33 | 16 |
| Defense Yds | 15.67 | 14.33 |
These numbers are pretty close, showing that the teams' opponents so far this year are not drastically different. That would suggest that we can trust the raw stats comparison and rankings comparison more directly without making allowance for differences in opponent strength. One thing that does strike me, though, is that with virtually identical average opponents' offensive rankings, the Chargers' defense is ranked significantly lower than the Steelers'. This may suggest that San Diego's defense is more susceptible than we first think. However, on the other hand, the Steelers' opponents have an overall lower average ranking in defensive points allowed than defensive yards. Yet, the Steelers offense is ranked drastically lower in points scored than yards gained. This suggests that the Steelers' offense is going to continue to really struggle to score points, even if they move the ball effectively.
This data does not really give a clear favorite in this game. Both teams are averaging within about 3 points when looking at their own points scored and points allowed. I would expect that playing at home will be an advantage for Pittsburgh, particularly since it is such a long trip for San Diego. And, being a night game, it will be colder than it would if the game were at 1pm or 4 pm. I guess I would lean toward the Steelers winning based on home field, if nothing else.
This FanPost was written by a member of the Bolts From The Blue community and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bolts From The Blue editors or SB Nation.
8 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice post
But I think the string ends here.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
Rec'd
if only because it’s very similar to the game preview that’s going up later today. It’s important to note that the Steelers are still 1-0 at home and 9-2 at home since the start of the 2008 season.
I think, so far this season, that the Chargers remind me a lot of the 2008 Arizona Cardinals. While that team came close to defeating the Steelers in the SB, they did so on a neutral field.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
Nice analysis.
One thing I might suggest on the Chargers Points Allowed. I think we gave up a few later touchdowns during trash time. I think that maybe overstating PA.
See this statistical anomaly all goes back to our team’s penchant for not being able to hold a lead. As a Charger fan – I consider the game tied if my team does not have a lead of 13 points or more at the 2 minute warning.
I hate it but its true, our Defense routinely folds up like a cheap suit when we have the lead late in the game. And we fold in so many ways: they go into the prevent; they’ll send 3 D Linemen to create pressure; The Safeties will stand around and point at the open Receivers behind them….
Funny thing is they do none of that silly stuff if they are behind at the end of the game. So watch out. If the Steelers have a slim advantage at the end of this game IT IS ON!
by Trendsearcher on Oct 2, 2009 9:28 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Yeah
That’s one thing that never seemed to happen in 2006 for some reason.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
I know how you feel
The Steelers have seemed to have been the same way this year. They won the game that they trailed most of the game and lost the two that they had late leads.
For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Oct 2, 2009 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions
We don't even necessarily lose...
… it’s not EVERY TIME: they held down the Pats and Raiders for a spanking last year… but very frequently, these Chargers will just eat a team’s lunch in the first 2 or 3 quarters, then let them back into the game. Often enough, they hold on to win anyway (Indy 2007, last year vs. Chiefs in SD), or even just mutilate them after they’ve had their comeback (the Jets, Bucs, Broncos last year), but it’s like the team is allergic to maintaining a lead. It makes for good TV, at least.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 3, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Sometimes I've wondered about that
It seems very common these days for teams to lose a lead. At least, it has been much more common in the last few years than it was when I started watching the NFL in the 80’s. Back then, if you down by more than 10 in the 4th quarter, it was over, unless Elway, Montana, or Marino were your QB.
I know that the NFL has made many rules changes aimed at increasing offensive output, particularly in the passing game. So, if I had to guess as to reason, that’s probably it.
For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Oct 3, 2009 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions

by 





















