Chargers looking at aborted Convention Center site in Chula Vista

about 1 year ago Brian (DaBolts) 4 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Read More: new stadium, San Diego Chargers

Comments

Aborted?

Ex-Gaylord?

Just what is this article about, anyway?

Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you? ◔ヮ◔
Uncommon Sportsman :: Absurdity in play

by Axion on Jan 13, 2009 5:02 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

That the Sunrise Power Link had been approved. I remember that a while back they were talking about that approval being a big hurdle in getting the power plant site. Anybody heard what the next big hurdle is for that site?

1-10-DEN 18 (9:52) (Shotgun) 6-J.Cutler pass short right intended for 19-E.Royal INTERCEPTED by 93-L.Castillo (95-S.Phillips) at DEN 18. 93-L.Castillo to DEN 14 for 4 yards (62-C.Wiegmann). 6-J.Cutler pouts ob to DEN 25 for 11 yards.

by Wonko on Jan 13, 2009 5:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

I thought Measure B

or whichever one that had to do with the waterfront development that got slaughtered by voters was a defacto referendum on the Chargers getting a stadium. I hope they get one, but my major concern is if they have capacity at 55,000, per the plans that I read when the stadium designs were published, the NFL would thumb their nose at San Diego for ever hosting another Super Bowl. Capacity HAS to be at least 70,000 for the NFL to bring its championship game here.

by Lancers46 on Jan 14, 2009 2:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

That was different

That was a longshot possible stadium site that no one really said was going to be used for a stadium until it was on the ballot. The Chargers never really targeted that location, but their official stance was that they were interested in the results of the vote.

by Wonko on Jan 14, 2009 3:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs