Grading the Bolts
This season has been like waiting for Godot, well last night Godot finally showed up. It's just too bad it's so late. I know it was the Raiders and they were mailing it in; but the defense just is better under Rivera. The other thing that showed is what an enormous difference between the Bolts and the Raiders, despite almost identical records. The Raiders are just done for this year. The play of fourth and two where McFadden wouldn't even put his hands up to catch a slightly overthrown ball is where that team is at. The Chargers are still playing hard despite being in almost the same spot in the rankings.
The Bolts haven't been blown out this year; they may lose but they don't fold. The other thing watching the Raiders makes you appreciate about Norv is the development of Rivers. You look at Russell and he has an absolute gun, but without a QB coach he is just a Plaxident waiting to happen (what's the royalty on that Axion?). I'll carp some about the penalties again; 9 for 51 yards. Some of those were just being overly aggressive and being too quick over the line; but the false starts this late in the season have to stop, against a better team those can be huge. I was not crazy about the challenge with two minutes left leading 34-7; I like hard play but lets not go the Bilichick bitch slap route when teams are beaten. Ok, on to the grades.
Quarterback - A
Folks could quibble; Rivers didn't rack up huge yards and had three TD's through the air; but he owned this game. Two deep plays, lumbering for two first downs and no turnovers; he put this game out of reach. After the Raven's game it would have been so easy for him to lay his performance on his offensive line; but he never did that and he praised them extensively after the game yesterday.
Offensive line - A
What a comeback, these guys were awful against Atlanta but showed up for run blocking and pass blocking against the Raiders. You look at what happened to Oakland and it brings back that everything starts with the offensive line. Earlier I was thinking the Bolts should go defensive nose tackle with the first rounder; now I think it has to be an offensive tackle. Yeah, I remember they made the penalties, but they came up with extra credit last night; credit Dielman for 15 yards in getting the Raiders to blow their cool.
Wide Receivers - A-
Mostly sharp, Vincent Jackson blew by coverage and caught a huge gainer for the TD; he also had the big gainer on the opening drive despite having a Raider draped all over him. Chambers missed a tough catch; he just hasn't been on since that ankle injury.
via static.nfl.com
Running Backs - A-
These guys went for 158 yards on the ground and LT had a nice rumble called back on a hold. LT ran it in from the red zone; Sproles caught the ball; ran the ball and had one punt return called back for another hold.
Tight Ends - B
Gates pulled double coverage opening up the Wide receivers and Manumaleuna had some great blocks in the running game.
Defensive line - A
This is a good rushing team that got held to just 54 yards. Jamal is just a plain old monster in the middle; I don't know what they are feeding him but I wish they would give it to everyone. You can almost see the opposing centers cringing when he lines up.
Linebackers - A
All season long S. Phillips and J. Tucker have been trying to fill Merriman's shows and they kept flying off because lets face it; those are some big damn shoes. Last night they just tore it up; I know it helps to be going against Kwame Harris but these guys picked up three sacks and had huge pressure that resulted in four turnovers. Phillips sure looked comfortable back on his weak side spot. Cooper looked terrific too; with two picks, 7 tackles and two PDs. Antwan Applewhite saw more time; I thought he looked good out there but not much stat wise.
Corners - B
Jammer and Cromartie had two PDs; they sure look a lot better when the QB doesn't have time. Cromartie had that ridiculous run on the pitched pick that I was certain was going to end in a fumble but was just plain fun to watch.
Safeties - B
Gregory looked good out there filling in for Hart. He made some big hits that held folks shy of the first down and ended up as the teams leading tackler. Weddle showed up too; he had a rough start but really seems to be settling in directing the secondary.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i like that the ref started laughing when he announced that san diego was challenging the ruling on the field
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
Same here.
I hate the Raiders and it was nice to see that Norv does, too.
by Richard Wade on Dec 5, 2008 10:36 AM PST up reply actions
that was funny
2009 San Diego Padres. Not as bad as Aztec Football!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Dec 5, 2008 11:33 AM PST up reply actions
agreed
i agree with all of your grades and with all of the commentary last night.
marshall faulk’s pregame rant about toe injuries taking a year and a half to heal has me giving LT a little bit more slack than normal.
gregory looked great. never expected that out of him. i’ve had no complaints with weddle since rivera took over.
putting phillips as the strong-side OLB may have cost us a game or more over the course of this season. the return of our passrush the last couple of games is all phillips. really stupid move by cottrell or rivera (he was the LB coach at the time) to move him over there.
Phillips
putting phillips as the strong-side OLB may have cost us a game or more over the course of this season. the return of our passrush the last couple of games is all phillips. really stupid move by cottrell or rivera (he was the LB coach at the time) to move him over there.
Right, I can see the rationale that he is your most athletic LB; but you have to adjust when something isn’t working. That was my main problem with Cottrell, it wasn’t working and he just seemed to be waiting for it to start working.
"Football is a physical sport, sometimes you have a disagreement on what's going on, and you have a discussion about it." Kris Dielman
by Brian (DaBolts) on Dec 5, 2008 11:07 AM PST up reply actions
I think the jury is still out on the Phillips switch
If we had done this earlier teams may have started to react (as early as halftime of the first game it was tried) by sliding their protection so that he still got the double teams. I realize that the idea of the Will LB is to go to the side without the TE, but you could still double team him without moving the TE. Against the Raiders though it looks brilliant because they have no coaching capable of making these type of corrections.
I do agree with the Cottrell assessment that he never tried to take advantage of mismatches. I think he called his plays without ever thinking things like “Their LG is hurt, we should attack him with our best pass rusher” it was more like “Blitz, blitz, blitz, please don’t screw up the coverage”.
"Whoa... You can't say stuff like that!"
"I get it Chief. I'll play ball. You just gotta blow the whistle and call the fouls. Alright?"
I can't argue too much with the grades
But the collection doesn’t seem representative of the overall performance. I know the scoreboard shows a blowout, but the offense took advantage of some great field position to get most of those scores. At other times they looked a little sluggish and I’m pretty sure that when the performance data comes out, we’ll see that the number don’t come out in their favor. I think the blowout was more representative of the opponent playing poorly and the Chargers not stinking, then any particular form of dominance by the Chargers.
I guess my one real quibble would be in the running game. Even though LT looked good, his yards per carry were pretty low. Maybe stopping the run is the raiders only strength or something, but averaging that few yards on the ground does not look good.
"Whoa... You can't say stuff like that!"
"I get it Chief. I'll play ball. You just gotta blow the whistle and call the fouls. Alright?"
Good point on the running game
I meant to add something like that. To some degree doesn’t running inside the ten hold your stats down? Inside the five running is just a different story; I thought M. Turner’s numbers suffered from that as well. Admittedly Turner just flat got stuffed on the one series before the half; I guess LT came up short on the first drive as well.
Do you (or anybody) know if football outsiders adjusts for running inside the ten or five? From first down inside the five a three yard gain would seem to be a success to me; especially from a run formation where the opponent is stacking the box.
"Football is a physical sport, sometimes you have a disagreement on what's going on, and you have a discussion about it." Kris Dielman
by Brian (DaBolts) on Dec 6, 2008 10:25 AM PST up reply actions
I'm pretty sure
The goal line is treated like the first down line for success rate purposes. So a 3 yard gain on 1st down with 5 to go would be 60% of the yards needed and definitely considered a success.
"Whoa... You can't say stuff like that!"
"I get it Chief. I'll play ball. You just gotta blow the whistle and call the fouls. Alright?"




































