Kansas City Chiefs vs. San Diego Chargers, Offense
The Chiefs are at 1-7 for a reason, they are in the midst of rebuilding. They were largely regarded as having conducted a great draft; but they are clearly struggling through the season with a running back that is a distraction with his off field antics and their Pro Bowl tight end asking to be traded. That said, they made a good showing against a good Tampa Bay defense last week. T. Thigpen had a good week with an 89.4 QB rating and 164 yards through the air. Jamaal Charles, someone I hoped the Chargers would target in the draft, ended up running for over 100 yards.
Kansas City really needs to run well to win a game; but they are going to be without Larry Johnson, who will be on suspension for spitting his drink in a woman's face. This means the Chargers are going to need to stop Jamaal Charles who is a real speedster. The other two key weapons in Kansas City's attack are Tony Gonzalez and Dwayne Bowe. Tight ends have been eating the Chargers alive all season and Tony Gonzalez is one of the very best. The Chargers need to really chip him hard at the line and provide close coverage when he goes out in passing routes. Against Tampa Bay Gonzalez caught 8 passes for 65 yards. The other aerial threat is Dwayne Bowe who absolutely lit the Chargers up last year, he had over 160 yards in the game at the Murph. Hopefully Jammer will be able to shut him down this year; especially with KC having a very inexperienced QB.
Tyler Thigpen is the Chiefs third string quarterback, and while he isn't going to confuse anyone with Peyton Manning he has been playing mistake free football and will scramble for some yards if the defense isn't careful. One of the Keys for the Chargers will be to play mistake free football; Tampa turned the ball over four times and was just flat lucky to come away with a win. For the view from the other side, be sure to check out the excellent Chiefs blog at Arrowhead Pride.
0 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
Will we get a sack?
It’s been what, 9 quarters w/o one? Time to step it up. I would love to see us manhandle the Chief’s offense.
How’s Tucker feeling? 100%?
What major changes, if any, do you think Rivera has in store for us?
by The Kipper on Nov 6, 2008 11:55 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
One thing Rivera could improve the D with
More DB blitzes. I was watching the Steelers game on Monday and they run a 3-4 and had blitzing DBs every once in a while. You rarely see that with the Chargers this year. In the past we used to do it more. It would probably take some pressure off the LBs if the opposing O-Line was forced to worry about the little guys squirting through.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 6, 2008 12:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My Guess
Wonko is right; we will see some blitzes from the safeties, maybe even the corners. I’m hoping to see some delayed blitzes as well. I read where Rivera went back to look at the game film from the 2006 season; that made me happy. I expect to see at least one sack and a lot more aggression. The one thing I worry about is that they might get too amped up and overpursue or blow containment. I can see them giving up some big plays in this game, but hopefully will balance that out with some turnovers or ‘three and outs’. Supposedly Rivera is simplifying the defensive playbook so they can think less and just let their athleticism take over.
Tucker didn’t miss any practices; I expect him to be full speed. The two who didn’t practice today were Chambers (ankle still) and Cromartie (Hip). Floyd has proven a good backup for Chambers, and I thought Gordon looked pretty good filling in for Jammer in London.
"Football is a physical sport, sometimes you have a disagreement on what's going on, and you have a discussion about it." Chris Dielman
by Brian (DaBolts) on Nov 6, 2008 12:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Simplifying = taking out the plays he doesn't like
Before installing the ones he does in future weeks.
It’s like a secret code. You’ll catch on.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 6, 2008 1:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully...
More Safety blitzes, at least Clinton Hart would be doing somthing this year.
by Schwing on Nov 6, 2008 2:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly!
Man-0 Jailbreak Blitz say I.
"Football is a physical sport, sometimes you have a disagreement on what's going on, and you have a discussion about it." Chris Dielman
by Brian (DaBolts) on Nov 6, 2008 3:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Time of possesion
I’m not sure how we’re doing in regards to time of possesion this year, but it would sure be nice to see our offense on the field a whole lot longer than this defense.
Makes me wonder how LT is feeling and if Norv will ever give Hester a chance.
If we could just force a couple more tihree and outs each game, we would have to establish the run, becuase Rivers and his receivers are just too damn good to hold on to the ball for any period of time.
by The Kipper on Nov 6, 2008 1:33 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hester
Hester will never be a big time back. He’s going to be a key special teamer, he won’t hurt you if he’s running behind a good line and he might eventually be able to do some interesting stuff lining up in the slot. But to take away carries from a healthy LT (which I’m thoroughly convinced is his current status) would be a major mistake.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 6, 2008 1:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I figured LT was close to 100%
and how could you take carries away from him when he is. But two carries for Hester all year? C’mon Norv. Unless they’re seeing something in practice that has convinced them not to play Hester, I don’t see why we wouldn’t give him the opportunity to smash a run up the middle ocassionally.
by The Kipper on Nov 6, 2008 2:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He's a rookie
If you recall, Sproles didn’t get many chances as a rookie either. It might even be a case of exposure. They worry that he’ll struggle at times and the times he doesn’t will just give others film on him. Keep him in the back pocket and unleash him when he’s more experienced.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 7, 2008 5:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but
how many rookies have we seen this year making a difference on other teams. I’m just saying, one or two plays a game maybe. Enough to boost his confidence while he gains experience.
by The Kipper on Nov 7, 2008 6:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 














