Grading the Bolts
Quarterback - A-
Rivers threw the late interception, but he was mostly impeccable finding the open receiver and cutting the Saints secondary to ribbons. He looks terrific back there, and doesn't seem to know the word panic even as the team falls behind. This has been a tough season, but you never see him hanging his head or blaming the defense for the losses. He has really matured into a leader and a great quarterback.
Wide Receivers - A-
They were getting open the whole game, made spectacular catches and generally had a terrific day. Vincent Jackson dropped one pass that would have gone the distance, otherwise I would have given them a solid A. I like the spreads with Floyd, VJ and Chambers. As dispiriting as the loss was, the offense is just fun to watch. There are so many weapons and Rivers seems to be getting the ball to all of them. If the defense can even play average ball, this team is going to light some folks up.
Tight Ends - A
Gates looked full speed to me for the first time this season. I really enjoyed seeing him racking up the yards and pulling in the TD. Six receptions for 96 yards and the TD was his final line, but he is clearly back in action. B. Manumaleuna only had one catch for 7 yards, but also had a TD taken away by a penalty.
Running Backs -A-
LT had 19 rushes for 105 yards and tacked on 65 yards receiving to boot. He looked like himself for the first time this season. Sproles and Tolbert only got two carries, but Tolberts was a costly third and short failure.
Offensive Line - A
What can you say, holes to run through and all day for Rivers to find the open receiver. There was so much that went right for the offense, If only these games went one more quarter.
Defensive Line - D
The pressure was better this week, but still couldn't disrupt this high powered Saints offense into making mistakes. There were some close calls, but this team always seems to come up a dollar short on the defensive side of the ball. On the plus side the run defense held the NO offense to under 100 yards (even excluding the final 26 yard backwards run by Brees to burn time). That said, we just didn't get the pressure needed to throw of the passing attack, it can be done as Carolina had proved just last week.
Linebackers - C-
The run defense was often good, although the Saints were able to turn the corner on a sweep at least once. S. Phillips and J. Tucker seemed to be very close to sacks on more than one occasion, but Brees was very good at slipping them or getting rid of the ball just before they could bring him down. All the talk about aggressive play seemed to lead to some stupid penalties for late hits; this is not a defense that can afford mistakes.
Safeties -D
Hart looked much better in coverage to me; but there were way to many instances where receivers were just all by themselves. Weddle came close to making the big interception, but the reversal of the call coupled with his penalty for excessive celebration was ugly. There was more press defense which I liked, but still they couldn't produce the crucial turn over or the big stop.
Cornerbacks- D
One TD play was just a great diving catch. There was another crushing penalty against Cletis Gordon that didn't look entirely legit to me; but lets face it there were other times when Wideouts were catching balls without a Charger defender even being in the camera shot. The lack of pressure is totally exposing these guys, but you have to hang at least some of the worst pass defense in the league on the corners.
Coaching- D
This was a game plan that could have worked, but with 14 penalties you have to say the sloppy play reflects poorly on the coaching. It did look to me like the defense was in press more often, and certainly 30 points for the offense should be enough to win most games, but this is a team that can't afford errors.
1 recs |
33 comments
|
Comments
i'm sick of these bums playing for one quarter
you CAN NOT just slack off for the first three quarters and then turn it on in the fourth and expect to win in this league.
total crap.
seems to be a hallmark of recent chargers teams, either play hard in the first then douche it up the rest of the game, or do the complete opposite.
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Oct 27, 2008 9:06 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
They need to come out strong
In the two games they bounced up early; the Jets and NE they were dominant. They are consistently behind at half time; it’s great to see they never give up but they need to start jumping out to a fast start.
"Football is a physical sport, sometimes you have a disagreement on what's going on, and you have a discussion about it." Chris Dielman
by Brian (DaBolts) on Oct 27, 2008 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you are too generous in your LB and DL grades
I’d give them both solid F’s, although your “almost sack” logic almost convinces me to give them a D. I can’t claim that the DB’s did well, but I’m not going to fault them for the pass rush allowing receivers to find holes in the zone because that’s what happens when you play press coverage.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Oct 27, 2008 9:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps
I thought they looked reasonably good against the run. Still I guess when you are giving up yards and points like that it hardly matters. I have to credit NO some too; when you consider how often Brees drops back, he is one of the least sacked QBs in the NFL. Buffalo was the game that killed me, they should have gotten to Trent Edwards.
"Football is a physical sport, sometimes you have a disagreement on what's going on, and you have a discussion about it." Chris Dielman
by Brian (DaBolts) on Oct 27, 2008 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't believe there haven't been adjustments
It seems painfully obvious to me that this defense is designed around a healthy Merriman. Why there hasn’t been an adjustment to include different blitzing packages is beyond me. Our safeties aren’t quick enough to help out with pressure? It’s not like they’re covering anybody down field… May as well put them to use.
by Dex on Oct 27, 2008 10:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Blitzing
The Chargers used tons of different blitz packages against the Saints. The fact that no one came unblocked maybe a sign that they aren’t scheming well enough, but I say that if there are teams out there that can get pressure with just 4 down lineman and no one coming unblocked then it seems that even the most basic 5 man blitz should be able to get to QB every now and again. The Chargers can’t seem to do that.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Oct 27, 2008 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That, I think, goes to show that this is a player problem more than a coaching problem.
by Richard Wade on Oct 27, 2008 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
An outsider's perspective
From Mile High Report
Let’s start with the first point. The AFC West just isn’t a very good division. Sure, the Chargers are talented, but Norv Turner’s “solid leadership” is eroding the quality of play at an atomic rate. Did you see how many horrible penalties the Chargers committed yesterday?? Sure, the Broncos are struggling a bit on defense, but remember, it is the Chargers that played in the AFC Championship Game, and it is the Chargers that nearly everyone picked to win the AFC West, and many chose to go to the Super Bowl. Yes, the loss of Shawne Merriman is big, but when Merriman missed 4 games for taking steroids, the Chargers went 4-0. Their level of play is eroding, and that is WITH Philip Rivers leading the NFL in Passer Rating. The Chargers are the team with all the pressure even if the Broncos play their way out of the playoffs.
by The Kipper on Oct 27, 2008 11:11 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
good points
(vomits on shoes)
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Oct 27, 2008 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ditto that
Fire Ted Cottrell! Promote Ron Rivera!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Oct 27, 2008 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem I have
with that is that the offense is not eroding at all; in fact it’s the only reason for hope. It’s much more dynamic than it was under Schottenheimer. What is much worse is the defense; and while we did win those games without him, the defense gave up a lot more points while he was out.
"Football is a physical sport, sometimes you have a disagreement on what's going on, and you have a discussion about it." Chris Dielman
by Brian (DaBolts) on Oct 27, 2008 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
Our offense is near perfect, especially with LT looking healthy. We scored 30 points yesterday….
Defense it breaking down at every position.
We're gonna dazzle you with our super play.
by soulSD on Oct 27, 2008 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Turner is an excellent offensive coordinator
but a bad head coach. its been his achilles heel in the past…
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Oct 27, 2008 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it Turner’s fault that his front seven can’t shed blocks or tackle?
by Richard Wade on Oct 27, 2008 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes?
most likely no.
but there has to be some accountability. i don’t know where we find it. but we have to find it somewhere. seems like the most logical place for me.
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Oct 27, 2008 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Accountability for the sake of Accountability
Is a one-way ticket to last place.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Oct 27, 2008 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
so is zero accountability
see Padres, San Diego
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Oct 27, 2008 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I seem to recall the Padres having just had a run of success unprecedented in the franchise’s history. I also can’t recall any instances that would suggest there was zero accountability in the organization.
by Richard Wade on Oct 27, 2008 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Run of succesees:
I assume you mean 2005 and 2006 where we went 82-80 and 88-74. I guess success is subjective. We did go 1-6 in the playoffs! Going to the playoffs two years in a row and calling it unprecedented for the padres shouldn’t impress anyone.
Who has claimed responsibility for the 99 loss season and the state of the team? I can’t remember any instances that would suggest there was any accountability in the organization, short of Wally Joyner.
We're gonna dazzle you with our super play.
by soulSD on Oct 27, 2008 11:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Four consecutive winning seasons. The Padres had never put together more than two in a row iirc. That would qualify as unprecedented success in my opinion. If it doesn’t in yours, I’m not going to argue with you.
I don’t recall Wally Joyner taking responsibility for the 99 loss season. He left because of a disagreement over the team’s philosophy on hitting. I’m not sure what you want in the way of claiming responsibility. I’m pretty sure the front office has said that they take responsibility for it. Do you want them to abandon the approach they have previously had success with because of one failed season? If you do, I can’t say that I understand.
by Richard Wade on Oct 28, 2008 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahah i misss the padres....
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Oct 28, 2008 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
blame taken
i cant help it
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Oct 29, 2008 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about
When the Padres had bad seasons and bad draft in the early 00s there was accountability. They added Gayton, Fuson, Sandy and DePodesta. They stripped KT of many of his duties and fired the accountant posing as a CEO. You are off base here. The Padres were right in not breaking up the new front office after having 1 bad year after 4 good ones.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Oct 28, 2008 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
That doesn’t count because it’s not as emotionally satisfying.
by Richard Wade on Oct 28, 2008 6:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
More from MHR:
Take heart that Drew Brees is an absolute beast of a quarterback. He completely shredded us in week 3 on something like 30/40 passing for about 400 yards, not unlike what he did to you. It’s like he’s playing Madden out there. And he had most of us calling for Bob Slowik’s head in the same fashion you guys are going after Ted Cotrell.
*Breathes into bag. At least I'm not a Chiefs fan. At least I'm not a Chiefs fan. At least I'm not a Chiefs fan. At least I'm not a Chiefs fan.
by papigrande on Oct 27, 2008 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
we know dude
he used to be our quarterback
by The Kipper on Oct 28, 2008 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
re: the DBs
that TD early on where there were no Chargers in the screen, and the WR was just standing still in the corner of the end zone, that was nauseating.
he didn’t move. not once. and was wide open.
freakin atrocious.
i hate this team
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Oct 27, 2008 11:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
There was two reciever
wide open in the end zone that same play, with two defender’s looking around at all of the fancy decorations in the stadium.
Fire Ted Cottrell! Promote Ron Rivera!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Oct 27, 2008 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
in their defense
it is quite nice and shiny.
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Oct 27, 2008 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 















